317 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10718143)
1. Comparison of seed loading approaches in prostate brachytherapy.
Butler WM; Merrick GS; Lief JH; Dorsey AT
Med Phys; 2000 Feb; 27(2):381-92. PubMed ID: 10718143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prostate seed implantation using 3D-computer assisted intraoperative planning vs. a standard look-up nomogram: Improved target conformality with reduction in urethral and rectal wall dose.
Raben A; Chen H; Grebler A; Geltzeiler J; Geltzeiler M; Keselman I; Litvin S; Sim S; Hanlon A; Yang J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Dec; 60(5):1631-8. PubMed ID: 15590195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of the radial function on I-125 seeds used for permanent prostate implantation.
Pickett B; Pouliot J
Med Dosim; 2004; 29(3):204-9. PubMed ID: 15324917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prostatic conformal brachytherapy: 125I/103Pd postoperative dosimetric analysis.
Merrick GS; Butler WM; Dorsey AT; Walbert HL
Radiat Oncol Investig; 1997; 5(6):305-13. PubMed ID: 9436248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Moving toward focal therapy in prostate cancer: dual-isotope permanent seed implants as a possible solution.
Todor DA; Barani IJ; Lin PS; Anscher MS
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Sep; 81(1):297-304. PubMed ID: 21536392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Intraoperative and post-implant dosimetry in patients treated with permanent prostate implant brachytherapy].
Herein A; Ágoston P; Szabó Z; Jorgo K; Markgruber B; Pesznyák C; Polgár C; Major T
Magy Onkol; 2015 Jun; 59(2):148-53. PubMed ID: 26035163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Urethra low-dose tunnels: validation of and class solution for generating urethra-sparing dose plans using inverse planning simulated annealing for prostate high-dose-rate brachytherapy.
Cunha JA; Pouliot J; Weinberg V; Wang-Chesebro A; Roach M; Hsu IC
Brachytherapy; 2012; 11(5):348-53. PubMed ID: 21937284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Modified uniform seed loading for prostate brachytherapy: rationale, design, and evaluation.
Merrick GS; Butler WM
Tech Urol; 2000 Jun; 6(2):78-84. PubMed ID: 10798804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Permanent implant brachytherapy for early, organ-confined prostate cancer].
Agoston P; Major T; Fröhlich G; Baricza K; Szabó Z; Lövey J; Varjas G; Kásler M; Fodor J; Polgár C
Magy Onkol; 2011 Sep; 55(3):170-7. PubMed ID: 21918742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Inverse automated treatment planning with and without individual optimization in interstitial permanent prostate brachytherapy with high- and low-activity 125I.
Pinkawa M; Maurer U; Mulhern A; Gagel B; Block T; Borchers H; Grieger J; Henkel T; Eble M
Strahlenther Onkol; 2003 Jun; 179(6):417-22. PubMed ID: 12789469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is it necessary to eliminate the posterior dose margin in prostate brachytherapy to achieve an acceptably low risk of late rectal morbidity?
Waterman FM; Dicker AP
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2003 Sep; 57(1):293-9. PubMed ID: 12909246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Isotope choice and the effect of edema on prostate brachytherapy dosimetry.
Butler WM; Merrick GS; Dorsey AT; Lief JH
Med Phys; 2000 May; 27(5):1067-75. PubMed ID: 10841411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of prostate volume on dosimetry results in real-time 125I seed implantation.
McNeely LK; Stone NN; Presser J; Chircus JH; Stock RG
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Jan; 58(1):292-9. PubMed ID: 14697451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of source batch S dispersion on dosimetry for prostate cancer treatment with permanent implants.
Nuñez-Cumplido E; Perez-Calatayud J; Casares-Magaz O; Hernandez-Armas J
Med Phys; 2015 Aug; 42(8):4933-40. PubMed ID: 26233219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is intraoperative nomogram-based overplanning of prostate implants necessary?
D'Souza WD; Lee HK; Palmer MB; Smith LG; Pollack A
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2003 Jun; 56(2):462-7. PubMed ID: 12738321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Seed displacements after permanent brachytherapy for prostate cancer in dependence on the prostate level.
Pinkawa M; Gagel B; Asadpour B; Piroth MD; Klotz J; Borchers H; Jakse G; Eble MJ
Strahlenther Onkol; 2008 Oct; 184(10):520-5. PubMed ID: 19016041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dose homogeneity as a function of source activity in optimized I-125 prostate implant treatment plans.
D'Souza WD; Meyer RR
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Nov; 51(4):1120-30. PubMed ID: 11704337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Automated treatment planning engine for prostate seed implant brachytherapy.
Yu Y; Zhang JB; Brasacchio RA; Okunieff PG; Rubens DJ; Strang JG; Soni A; Messing EM
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Feb; 43(3):647-52. PubMed ID: 10078652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Loose versus stranded seeds in permanent prostate brachytherapy: dosimetric comparison of intraoperative plans.
Major T; Agoston P; Fröhlich G; Baricza K; Szabo Z; Jorgo K; Herein A; Polgar C
Phys Med; 2014 Dec; 30(8):909-13. PubMed ID: 25175151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intraoperative dynamic dose optimization in permanent prostate implants.
Lee EK; Zaider M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2003 Jul; 56(3):854-61. PubMed ID: 12788195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
