101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10718144)
1. Modeling dose response in the presence of spatial variations in dose rate.
Ebert MA; Zavgorodni SF
Med Phys; 2000 Feb; 27(2):393-400. PubMed ID: 10718144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biological optimization of heterogeneous dose distributions in systemic radiotherapy.
Strigari L; D'Andrea M; Maini CL; Sciuto R; Benassi M
Med Phys; 2006 Jun; 33(6):1857-66. PubMed ID: 16872093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A TCP model incorporating setup uncertainty and tumor cell density variation in microscopic extension to guide treatment planning.
Jin JY; Kong FM; Liu D; Ren L; Li H; Zhong H; Movsas B; Chetty IJ
Med Phys; 2011 Jan; 38(1):439-48. PubMed ID: 21361212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison between the ideal reference dose level and the actual reference dose level from clinical 3D radiotherapy treatment plans.
Bufacchi A; Arcangeli G; delle Canne S; Malatesta T; Capparella R; Fragomeni R; Marmiroli L; Begnozzi L
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Jul; 92(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 19328571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. On cold spots in tumor subvolumes.
Tomé WA; Fowler JF
Med Phys; 2002 Jul; 29(7):1590-8. PubMed ID: 12148742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dosimetric and radiobiological impact of dose fractionation on respiratory motion induced IMRT delivery errors: a volumetric dose measurement study.
Duan J; Shen S; Fiveash JB; Popple RA; Brezovich IA
Med Phys; 2006 May; 33(5):1380-7. PubMed ID: 16752574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reporting and analyzing dose distributions: a concept of equivalent uniform dose.
Niemierko A
Med Phys; 1997 Jan; 24(1):103-10. PubMed ID: 9029544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Loss of local control due to tumor displacement as a function of margin size, dose-response slope, and number of fractions.
Selvaraj J; Uzan J; Baker C; Nahum A
Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):041715. PubMed ID: 23556885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Response-probability volume histograms and iso-probability of response charts in treatment plan evaluation.
Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Lopes Mdo C
Med Phys; 2011 May; 38(5):2382-97. PubMed ID: 21776773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Study on the reference dose level in radiotherapy treatment planning.
Begnozzi L; Gentile FP; Chiatti L; Carpino S; Fragomeni R; Benassi M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1994 Jan; 28(2):515-22. PubMed ID: 8276669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A theoretical framework for prescribing radiotherapy dose distributions using patient-specific biological information.
South CP; Partridge M; Evans PM
Med Phys; 2008 Oct; 35(10):4599-611. PubMed ID: 18975706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Towards biologically conformal radiation therapy (BCRT): selective IMRT dose escalation under the guidance of spatial biology distribution.
Yang Y; Xing L
Med Phys; 2005 Jun; 32(6):1473-84. PubMed ID: 16013703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Viability of the EUD and TCP concepts as reliable dose indicators.
Ebert MA
Phys Med Biol; 2000 Feb; 45(2):441-57. PubMed ID: 10701514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development of generalized time-dependent TCP model and the investigation of the effect of repopulation and weekend breaks in fractionated external beam therapy.
Lee TK; Rosen II
J Theor Biol; 2021 Mar; 512():110565. PubMed ID: 33346019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. "SABER": A new software tool for radiotherapy treatment plan evaluation.
Zhao B; Joiner MC; Orton CG; Burmeister J
Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):5586-92. PubMed ID: 21158270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A general tumour control probability model for non-uniform dose distributions.
González SJ; Carando DG
Math Med Biol; 2008 Jun; 25(2):171-84. PubMed ID: 18515259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of tumor repopulation on radiotherapy planning.
Wang JZ; Li XA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Jan; 61(1):220-7. PubMed ID: 15629615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effects of radiotherapy treatment uncertainties on the delivered dose distribution and tumour control probability.
Booth JT; Zavgorodni SF
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2001 Jun; 24(2):71-8. PubMed ID: 11560173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Tumor control probability and the utility of 4D vs 3D dose calculations for stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung cancer.
Valdes G; Robinson C; Lee P; Morel D; Low D; Iwamoto KS; Lamb JM
Med Dosim; 2015; 40(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 25542785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluating the influence of setup uncertainties on treatment planning for focal liver tumors.
Balter JM; Brock KK; Lam KL; Tatro D; Dawson LA; McShan DL; Ten Haken RK
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Oct; 63(2):610-4. PubMed ID: 16095848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]