BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10718144)

  • 41. 3D calculation of absorbed dose for 131I-targeted radiotherapy: a Monte Carlo study.
    Saeedzadeh E; Sarkar S; Abbaspour Tehrani-Fard A; Ay MR; Khosravi HR; Loudos G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Jul; 150(3):298-305. PubMed ID: 22069233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Ideal dose level in treatment planning optimization.
    Begnozzi L; Malaspina F; Gentile FP; Chiatti L; Carpino S; Fragomeni R; Benassi M
    Strahlenther Onkol; 1992 Oct; 168(10):588-92. PubMed ID: 1440230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Confidence intervals in dose volume histogram computation.
    Cutanda Henríquez F; Vargas Castrillón S
    Med Phys; 2010 Apr; 37(4):1545-53. PubMed ID: 20443475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The influence of repopulation kinetics on isoeffect doses for permanent implants.
    Kneschaurek P
    Strahlenther Onkol; 1994 Oct; 170(10):602-7. PubMed ID: 7974172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Impact of dose and sensitivity heterogeneity on TCP.
    Wiklund K; Toma-Dasu I; Lind BK
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2014; 2014():182935. PubMed ID: 24899915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Microdosimetry and radiocurability: modelling targeted therapy with beta-emitters.
    Nahum AE
    Phys Med Biol; 1996 Oct; 41(10):1957-72. PubMed ID: 8912374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Some characteristics of tumour control probability for heterogeneous tumours.
    Ebert MA; Hoban PW
    Phys Med Biol; 1996 Oct; 41(10):2125-33. PubMed ID: 8912385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Comparison of DVH data from multiple radiotherapy treatment planning systems.
    Ebert MA; Haworth A; Kearvell R; Hooton B; Hug B; Spry NA; Bydder SA; Joseph DJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Jun; 55(11):N337-46. PubMed ID: 20463378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Implications of nonuniform tumor doses for radioimmunotherapy.
    O'Donoghue JA
    J Nucl Med; 1999 Aug; 40(8):1337-41. PubMed ID: 10450686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Three-dimensional radiobiologic dosimetry: application of radiobiologic modeling to patient-specific 3-dimensional imaging-based internal dosimetry.
    Prideaux AR; Song H; Hobbs RF; He B; Frey EC; Ladenson PW; Wahl RL; Sgouros G
    J Nucl Med; 2007 Jun; 48(6):1008-16. PubMed ID: 17504874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Investigation of four-dimensional (4D) Monte Carlo dose calculation in real-time tumor tracking stereotatic body radiotherapy for lung cancers.
    Chan MK; Kwong DL; Ng SC; Tam EK; Tong AS
    Med Phys; 2012 Sep; 39(9):5479-87. PubMed ID: 22957615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A new method for optimum dose distribution determination taking tumour mobility into account.
    Stavrev PV; Stavreva NA; Round WH
    Phys Med Biol; 1996 Sep; 41(9):1679-89. PubMed ID: 8884905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Optimization of equivalent uniform dose using the L-curve criterion.
    Chvetsov AV; Dempsey JF; Palta JR
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Oct; 52(19):5973-84. PubMed ID: 17881813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The value of nonuniform margins for six-field conformal irradiation of localized prostate cancer.
    Pickett B; Roach M; Verhey L; Horine P; Malfatti C; Akazawa C; Dea D; Varad B; Rathbun C; Phillips TL
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1995 Apr; 32(1):211-8. PubMed ID: 7721618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Choline PET based dose-painting in prostate cancer--modelling of dose effects.
    Niyazi M; Bartenstein P; Belka C; Ganswindt U
    Radiat Oncol; 2010 Mar; 5():23. PubMed ID: 20298546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Radiobiological impact of reduced margins and treatment technique for prostate cancer in terms of tumor control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP).
    Jensen I; Carl J; Lund B; Larsen EH; Nielsen J
    Med Dosim; 2011; 36(2):130-7. PubMed ID: 20488692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Implementation of a model for estimating tumor control probability for an inhomogeneously irradiated tumor.
    Niemierko A; Goitein M
    Radiother Oncol; 1993 Nov; 29(2):140-7. PubMed ID: 8310139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Evaluation of external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer using equivalent uniform dose.
    Wang JZ; Li XA
    Med Phys; 2003 Jan; 30(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 12557976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Assessment and quantification of patient set-up errors in nasopharyngeal cancer patients and their biological and dosimetric impact in terms of generalized equivalent uniform dose (gEUD), tumour control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP).
    Boughalia A; Marcie S; Fellah M; Chami S; Mekki F
    Br J Radiol; 2015 Jun; 88(1050):20140839. PubMed ID: 25882689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Potential benefits of dosimetric VMAT tracking verified with 3D film measurements.
    Crijns W; Defraene G; Van Herck H; Depuydt T; Haustermans K; Maes F; Van den Heuvel F
    Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2162. PubMed ID: 27147328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.