These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10718667)

  • 1. Three-shell head model constructed from scalp geometry for electroencephalogram dipole localization.
    Haque HA; Musha T; Nakajima M
    Front Med Biol Eng; 1999; 9(4):295-304. PubMed ID: 10718667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of conductivity uncertainties and modeling errors on EEG source localization using a 2-D model.
    Awada KA; Jackson DR; Baumann SB; Williams JT; Wilton DR; Fink PW; Prasky BR
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1998 Sep; 45(9):1135-45. PubMed ID: 9735563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ictal dipole source analysis based on a realistic scalp-skull-brain head model in localizing the epileptogenic zone.
    Mine S; Iwasa H; Kasagi Y; Yamaura A
    Neurosci Res; 2005 Apr; 51(4):453-61. PubMed ID: 15740808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dipole estimation errors due to not incorporating anisotropic conductivities in realistic head models for EEG source analysis.
    Hallez H; Staelens S; Lemahieu I
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Oct; 54(20):6079-93. PubMed ID: 19779215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of the isolated problem approach for multi-compartment BEM models of electro-magnetic source imaging.
    Gençer NG; Akalin-Acar Z
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jul; 50(13):3007-22. PubMed ID: 15972977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A finite difference method with reciprocity used to incorporate anisotropy in electroencephalogram dipole source localization.
    Hallez H; Vanrumste B; Van Hese P; D'Asseler Y; Lemahieu I; Van de Walle R
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Aug; 50(16):3787-806. PubMed ID: 16077227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A fast method to derive realistic BEM models for E/MEG source reconstruction.
    van't Ent D; de Munck JC; Kaas AL
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2001 Dec; 48(12):1434-43. PubMed ID: 11759924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Approximate average head models for EEG source imaging.
    Valdés-Hernández PA; von Ellenrieder N; Ojeda-Gonzalez A; Kochen S; Alemán-Gómez Y; Muravchik C; Valdés-Sosa PA
    J Neurosci Methods; 2009 Dec; 185(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 19747944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dipole estimation errors due to differences in modeling anisotropic conductivities in realistic head models for EEG source analysis.
    Hallez H; Vanrumste B; Van Hese P; Delputte S; Lemahieu I
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Apr; 53(7):1877-94. PubMed ID: 18364544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of head models on EEG simulations and inverse source localizations.
    Ramon C; Schimpf PH; Haueisen J
    Biomed Eng Online; 2006 Feb; 5():10. PubMed ID: 16466570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Estimation of neural generators of cognitive potential P300 by dipole tracing method].
    Nakajima Y; Miyamoto K; Kikuchi M
    No To Shinkei; 1994 Nov; 46(11):1059-65. PubMed ID: 7873279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Forward and inverse problems of EEG dipole localization.
    Musha T; Okamoto Y
    Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 1999; 27(3-5):189-239. PubMed ID: 10864280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of holes on EEG forward solutions using a realistic geometry head model.
    Li J; Wang K; Zhu S; He B
    J Neural Eng; 2007 Sep; 4(3):197-204. PubMed ID: 17873421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cortical imaging on a head template: a simulation study using a resistor mesh model (RMM).
    Chauveau N; Franceries X; Aubry F; Celsis P; Rigaud B
    Brain Topogr; 2008 Sep; 21(1):52-60. PubMed ID: 18629625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of local variations in skull and scalp thickness on EEG's and MEG's.
    Cuffin BN
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1993 Jan; 40(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 8468075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of CSF on EEG sensitivity distributions of multilayered head models.
    Wendel K; Narra NG; Hannula M; Kauppinen P; Malmivuo J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Apr; 55(4):1454-6. PubMed ID: 18390339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of head models on neuromagnetic fields and inverse source localizations.
    Ramon C; Haueisen J; Schimpf PH
    Biomed Eng Online; 2006 Oct; 5():55. PubMed ID: 17059601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Correlation between skull thickness asymmetry and scalp potential estimated by a numerical model of the head.
    Eshel Y; Witman S; Rosenfeld M; Abboud S
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1995 Mar; 42(3):242-9. PubMed ID: 7698779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An efficient algorithm for computing multishell spherical volume conductor models in EEG dipole source localization.
    Sun M
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1997 Dec; 44(12):1243-52. PubMed ID: 9401224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improved surface Laplacian estimates of cortical potential using realistic models of head geometry.
    Deng S; Winter W; Thorpe S; Srinivasan R
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2012 Nov; 59(11):2979-85. PubMed ID: 22249595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.