168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10719808)
1. The possible cost effectiveness of peripheral blood stem cell mobilization with cyclophosphamide and the late addition of G-CSF.
Min YJ; Kim SW; Suh C; Park J; Kim HJ; Kim JG; Kim TW; Lee JH; Kim SB; Lee KH; Lee JS; Kim WK; Kim SH
J Korean Med Sci; 2000 Feb; 15(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 10719808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Beyond CD34+ cell dose: impact of method of peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell mobilization (granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor [G-CSF], G-CSF plus plerixafor, or cyclophosphamide G-CSF/granulocyte-macrophage [GM]-CSF) on number of colony-forming unit-GM, engraftment, and Day +100 hematopoietic graft function.
Alexander ET; Towery JA; Miller AN; Kramer C; Hogan KR; Squires JE; Stuart RK; Costa LJ
Transfusion; 2011 Sep; 51(9):1995-2000. PubMed ID: 21392017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Factors influencing collection of peripheral blood stem cells in patients with multiple myeloma.
Demirer T; Buckner CD; Gooley T; Appelbaum FR; Rowley S; Chauncey T; Lilleby K; Storb R; Bensinger WI
Bone Marrow Transplant; 1996 Jun; 17(6):937-41. PubMed ID: 8807097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Peripheral blood stem cell mobilization with cyclophosphamide in combination with G-CSF, GM-CSF, or sequential GM-CSF/G-CSF in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients: a randomized prospective study.
Gazitt Y; Callander N; Freytes CO; Shaughnessy P; Liu Q; Tsai TW; Devore P
J Hematother Stem Cell Res; 2000 Oct; 9(5):737-48. PubMed ID: 11091498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of gradual increment in rhG-CSF dose on stem cell yields in patients with multiple myeloma mobilized with intermediate dose cyclophosphamide plus rhG-CSF.
Hacıoğlu S; Sarı I; Doğu MH; Keskin A
Transfus Apher Sci; 2014 Feb; 50(1):71-4. PubMed ID: 24342458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intermediate-dose versus low-dose cyclophosphamide and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma treated with novel induction therapies.
Hamadani M; Kochuparambil ST; Osman S; Cumpston A; Leadmon S; Bunner P; Watkins K; Morrison D; Speir E; Deremer D; Kota V; Jillella A; Craig M; Awan F
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2012 Jul; 18(7):1128-35. PubMed ID: 22248715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cyclophosphamide plus granulocyte-colony stimulating factor for hematopoietic stem cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma.
Lin TL; Wang PN; Kuo MC; Hung YH; Chang H; Tang TC
J Clin Apher; 2016 Oct; 31(5):423-8. PubMed ID: 26340986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mobilization strategies for the collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells: Results from a pilot study of delayed addition G-CSF following chemotherapy and review of the literature.
Jacoub JF; Suryadevara U; Pereyra V; Colón D; Fontelonga A; Mackintosh FR; Hall SW; Ascensão JL
Exp Hematol; 2006 Nov; 34(11):1443-50. PubMed ID: 17046563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Randomized comparison of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor versus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor plus intensive chemotherapy for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and autologous transplantation in multiple myeloma.
Arora M; Burns LJ; Barker JN; Miller JS; Defor TE; Olujohungbe AB; Weisdorf DJ
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2004 Jun; 10(6):395-404. PubMed ID: 15148493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Optimization of mobilization regimes of blood hemopoietic stem cells in patients with multiple myeloma].
Pokrovskaia OS; Mendeleeva LP; Urnova ES; Gaponova TV; Gribanova EO; Alekseeva IV; Drokov MIu; Kalinin NN; Gretsov EM; Kliasova GA; Savchenko VG
Ter Arkh; 2011; 83(7):50-7. PubMed ID: 21894752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Second attempts at mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells in patients with initial low CD34+ cell yields.
Weaver CH; Tauer K; Zhen B; Schwartzberg LS; Hazelton B; Weaver Z; Lewkow L; Allen C; Longin K; Buckner CD
J Hematother; 1998 Jun; 7(3):241-9. PubMed ID: 9621257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells following myelosuppressive chemotherapy: a randomized comparison of filgrastim, sargramostim, or sequential sargramostim and filgrastim.
Weaver CH; Schulman KA; Buckner CD
Bone Marrow Transplant; 2001 May; 27 Suppl 2():S23-9. PubMed ID: 11436117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells for autografting with low-dose cyclophosphamide plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor.
Bellido M; Sureda A; Martino R; Madoz P; García J; Brunet S
Haematologica; 1998 May; 83(5):428-31. PubMed ID: 9658727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The VAD chemotherapy regimen plus a G-CSF dose of 10 microg/kg is as effective and less toxic than high-dose cyclophosphamide plus a G-CSF dose of 5 microg/kg for progenitor cell mobilization: results from a monocentric study of 82 patients.
Lefrère F; Zohar S; Ghez D; Delarue R; Audat F; Suarez F; Hermine O; Damaj G; Maillard N; Ribeil JA; Azagury M; Misbahi R; Jondeau K; Cavazzana-Calvo M; Dal Cortivo L; Varet B
Bone Marrow Transplant; 2006 Apr; 37(8):725-9. PubMed ID: 16518433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The comparison of Filgrastim (Neupogen®), biosimilar filgrastim (Leucostim®) and Lenograstim (Granocyte®) as a first line peripheral blood stem cell mobilization strategy in autologous hematopoieitic stem cell transplantation: a single center experience from Turkey.
Sivgin S; Karakus E; Kaynar L; Kurnaz F; Pala C; Keklik M; Zararsiz G; Solmaz M; Eser B; Cetin M; Unal A
Transfus Apher Sci; 2013 Jun; 48(3):315-20. PubMed ID: 23611684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing high-dose ifosfamide + GM-CSF vs high-dose cyclophosphamide + GM-CSF for blood progenitor cell mobilization.
Vela-Ojeda J; Tripp-Villanueva F; Montiel-Cervantes L; Sánchez-Cortés E; Ayala-Sánchez M; Guevara-Moreno ME; García-León LD; Rosas-Cabral A; Esparza MA; González-Llaven J
Bone Marrow Transplant; 2000 Jun; 25(11):1141-6. PubMed ID: 10849526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. GM-CSF versus G-CSF: engraftment characteristics, resource utilization, and cost following autologous PBSC transplantation.
Zumberg MS; Leather HL; Nejame C; Meyer C; Wingard JR
Cytotherapy; 2002; 4(6):531-8. PubMed ID: 12568989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Autologous peripheral blood stem cells mobilization with etoposide plus rhG-CSF versus cyclophosphamide plus rhG-CSF].
Shi YK; He XH; Han XH; Liu P; Yang JL; Zhou SY; Zhou AP; Zhang CG; Ai B
Ai Zheng; 2003 Dec; 22(12):1311-6. PubMed ID: 14693058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mobilization of hematopoietic progenitor cells with paclitaxel (taxol) as a single chemotheraupetic agent, associated with rhG-CSF.
Gómez-Espuch J; Moraleda JM; Ortuño F; Lozano ML; Ayala F; Vallejo C; de Arriba F; Vicente V
Bone Marrow Transplant; 2000 Feb; 25(3):231-5. PubMed ID: 10673692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells with vinorelbine and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in multiple myeloma patients is reliable and cost effective.
Bargetzi MJ; Passweg J; Baertschi E; Schoenenberger A; Gwerder C; Tichelli A; Burger J; Mingrone W; Herrmann R; Gratwohl A; Wernli M
Bone Marrow Transplant; 2003 Jan; 31(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 12621490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
