These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10719998)

  • 41. Pseudo-polar drive patterns for brain electrical impedance tomography.
    Shi X; Dong X; Shuai W; You F; Fu F; Liu R
    Physiol Meas; 2006 Nov; 27(11):1071-80. PubMed ID: 17028402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Improving the finite element forward model of the human head by warping using elastic deformation.
    Tizzard A; Bayford RH
    Physiol Meas; 2007 Jul; 28(7):S163-82. PubMed ID: 17664634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Model estimates of CSF and skull influences on scalp-recorded ERPs.
    Pfefferbaum A
    Alcohol; 1990; 7(5):479-82. PubMed ID: 2222852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Correcting electrode modelling errors in EIT on realistic 3D head models.
    Jehl M; Avery J; Malone E; Holder D; Betcke T
    Physiol Meas; 2015 Dec; 36(12):2423-42. PubMed ID: 26502162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Scalp and skull influence on near infrared photon propagation in the Colin27 brain template.
    Strangman GE; Zhang Q; Li Z
    Neuroimage; 2014 Jan; 85 Pt 1():136-49. PubMed ID: 23660029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A modelling study to inform specification and optimal electrode placement for imaging of neuronal depolarization during visual evoked responses by electrical and magnetic detection impedance tomography.
    Gilad O; Horesh L; Holder DS
    Physiol Meas; 2009 Jun; 30(6):S201-24. PubMed ID: 19491442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Correlation between skull thickness asymmetry and scalp potential estimated by a numerical model of the head.
    Eshel Y; Witman S; Rosenfeld M; Abboud S
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1995 Mar; 42(3):242-9. PubMed ID: 7698779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Sensitivity Analysis Highlights the Importance of Accurate Head Models for Electrical Impedance Tomography Monitoring of Intracerebral Hemorrhagic Stroke.
    Paldanius A; Dekdouk B; Toivanen J; Kolehmainen V; Hyttinen J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2022 Apr; 69(4):1491-1501. PubMed ID: 34665718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Generating accurate finite element meshes for the forward model of the human head in EIT.
    Tizzard A; Horesh L; Yerworth RJ; Holder DS; Bayford RH
    Physiol Meas; 2005 Apr; 26(2):S251-61. PubMed ID: 15798238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The effect of the resistive properties of bone on neural excitation and electric fields in cochlear implant models.
    Malherbe TK; Hanekom T; Hanekom JJ
    Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():126-35. PubMed ID: 26074305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Computational model of an infant brain subjected to periodic motion simplified modelling and Bayesian sensitivity analysis.
    Batterbee DC; Sims ND; Becker W; Worden K; Rowson J
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2011 Nov; 225(11):1036-49. PubMed ID: 22292202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Correlation between structure and resistivity variations of the live human skull.
    Tang C; You F; Cheng G; Gao D; Fu F; Yang G; Dong X
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Sep; 55(9):2286-92. PubMed ID: 18713698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Comparison study of different head model structures with homogeneous/inhomogeneous conductivity.
    Wen P; Li Y
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2001 Mar; 24(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 11458570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Design of electrodes and current limits for low frequency electrical impedance tomography of the brain.
    Gilad O; Horesh L; Holder DS
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2007 Jul; 45(7):621-33. PubMed ID: 17597329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Fluid-structure interaction analysis of cerebrospinal fluid with a comprehensive head model subject to a rapid acceleration and deceleration.
    Toma M; Nguyen PDH
    Brain Inj; 2018; 32(12):1576-1584. PubMed ID: 30059633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Thickness and resistivity variations over the upper surface of the human skull.
    Law SK
    Brain Topogr; 1993; 6(2):99-109. PubMed ID: 8123431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Effects of tissue resistivities on electroencephalogram sensitivity distribution.
    Laarne P; Kauppinen P; Hyttinen J; Malmivuo J; Eskola H
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 1999 Sep; 37(5):555-9. PubMed ID: 10723891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Effect of skull resistivity on the spatial resolutions of EEG and MEG.
    Malmivuo JA; Suihko VE
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Jul; 51(7):1276-80. PubMed ID: 15248545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Neural networks method for identification of the objects behind the screen.
    Ratajewicz-Mikolajczak E; Sikora J
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2002 Jun; 21(6):613-9. PubMed ID: 12166857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Factors limiting the application of electrical impedance tomography for identification of regional conductivity changes using scalp electrodes during epileptic seizures in humans.
    Fabrizi L; Sparkes M; Horesh L; Perez-Juste Abascal JF; McEwan A; Bayford RH; Elwes R; Binnie CD; Holder DS
    Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S163-74. PubMed ID: 16636408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.