These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10720006)

  • 21. Electrical impedance tomography with compensation for electrode positioning variations.
    Blott BH; Daniell GJ; Meeson S
    Phys Med Biol; 1998 Jun; 43(6):1731-9. PubMed ID: 9651036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) for high-resolution conductivity imaging.
    Woo EJ; Seo JK
    Physiol Meas; 2008 Oct; 29(10):R1-26. PubMed ID: 18799834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Multi-frequency EIT system with radially symmetric architecture: KHU Mark1.
    Oh TI; Woo EJ; Holder D
    Physiol Meas; 2007 Jul; 28(7):S183-96. PubMed ID: 17664635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Detection of thoracic vascular structures by electrical impedance tomography: a systematic assessment of prominence peak analysis of impedance changes.
    Wodack KH; Buehler S; Nishimoto SA; Graessler MF; Behem CR; Waldmann AD; Mueller B; Böhm SH; Kaniusas E; Thürk F; Maerz A; Trepte CJC; Reuter DA
    Physiol Meas; 2018 Feb; 39(2):024002. PubMed ID: 29350189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A multifrequency serial EIT system.
    Chauveau N; Ayeva B; Rigaud B; Morucci JP
    Physiol Meas; 1996 Nov; 17 Suppl 4A():A7-13. PubMed ID: 9001597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Factors limiting the application of electrical impedance tomography for identification of regional conductivity changes using scalp electrodes during epileptic seizures in humans.
    Fabrizi L; Sparkes M; Horesh L; Perez-Juste Abascal JF; McEwan A; Bayford RH; Elwes R; Binnie CD; Holder DS
    Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S163-74. PubMed ID: 16636408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Reconstruction of the shape of conductivity spectra using differential multi-frequency magnetic induction tomography.
    Brunner P; Merwa R; Missner A; Rosell J; Hollaus K; Scharfetter H
    Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S237-48. PubMed ID: 16636414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Electrical impedance tomography in 3D using two electrode planes: characterization and evaluation.
    Wagenaar J; Adler A
    Physiol Meas; 2016 Jun; 37(6):922-37. PubMed ID: 27203154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Initial in vivo experience with EIT as a thermal estimator during hyperthermia.
    Paulsen KD; Moskowitz MJ; Ryan TP; Mitchell SE; Hoopes PJ
    Int J Hyperthermia; 1996; 12(5):573-91; discussion 593-4. PubMed ID: 8886886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Extraction of electrical characteristics from pixels of multifrequency EIT images.
    Fitzgerald AJ; Thomas BJ; Cornish BH; Michael GJ; Ward LC
    Physiol Meas; 1997 May; 18(2):107-18. PubMed ID: 9183805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A comparison of two EIT systems suitable for imaging impedance changes in epilepsy.
    Fabrizi L; McEwan A; Oh T; Woo EJ; Holder DS
    Physiol Meas; 2009 Jun; 30(6):S103-20. PubMed ID: 19491447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The impact of electrode area, contact impedance and boundary shape on EIT images.
    Boyle A; Adler A
    Physiol Meas; 2011 Jul; 32(7):745-54. PubMed ID: 21646710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Multi-frequency electrical impedance tomography system with automatic self-calibration for long-term monitoring.
    Wi H; Sohal H; McEwan AL; Woo EJ; Oh TI
    IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst; 2014 Feb; 8(1):119-28. PubMed ID: 24681925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A simple method to check the dynamic performance of electrical impedance tomography systems.
    Hahn G; Beer M; Frerichs I; Dudykevych T; Schröder T; Hellige G
    Physiol Meas; 2000 Feb; 21(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 10719999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Systematic errors of EIT systems determined by easily-scalable resistive phantoms.
    Hahn G; Just A; Dittmar J; Hellige G
    Physiol Meas; 2008 Jun; 29(6):S163-72. PubMed ID: 18544805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A high frequency electrical impedance tomograph using distributed parallel input channels.
    Jossinet J; Trillaud C; Risacher F; McAdams ET
    Med Prog Technol; 1993-1994; 19(4):167-72. PubMed ID: 8052171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Linearly constrained minimum variance spatial filtering for localization of conductivity changes in electrical impedance tomography.
    Fernández-Corazza M; von Ellenrieder N; Muravchik CH
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2015 Feb; 31(2):. PubMed ID: 25598007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Feature-space assessment of electrical impedance tomography coregistered with computed tomography in detecting multiple contrast targets.
    Krishnan K; Liu J; Kohli K
    Med Phys; 2014 Jun; 41(6):061903. PubMed ID: 24877814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Errors due to the truncation of the computational domain in static three-dimensional electrical impedance tomography.
    Vauhkonen PJ; Vauhkonen M; Kaipio JP
    Physiol Meas; 2000 Feb; 21(1):125-35. PubMed ID: 10720008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A one step image reconstruction algorithm for electrical impedance tomography in three dimensions.
    Le Hyaric A; Pidcock MK
    Physiol Meas; 2000 Feb; 21(1):95-8. PubMed ID: 10720004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.