133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10721187)
1. Pre-operative staging of cervical cancer: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) with histologic results.
Oellinger JJ; Blohmer JU; Michniewicz K; Siewert C; Wust P; Gutberlet M; Lichtenegger W; Felix R
Zentralbl Gynakol; 2000; 122(2):82-91. PubMed ID: 10721187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Preoperative staging of uterine cervical carcinoma: comparison of CT and MRI in 99 patients.
Kim SH; Choi BI; Han JK; Kim HD; Lee HP; Kang SB; Lee JY; Han MC
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1993; 17(4):633-40. PubMed ID: 8331236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Staging of cervical carcinoma: accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography.
Janus CL; Mendelson DS; Moore S; Gendal ES; Dottino P; Brodman M
Clin Imaging; 1989 Jun; 13(2):114-6. PubMed ID: 2766072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pretreatment staging of cervical cancer: is imaging better than palpation?: Role of CT and MRI in preoperative staging of cervical cancer: single institution results for 255 patients.
Hancke K; Heilmann V; Straka P; Kreienberg R; Kurzeder C
Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Oct; 15(10):2856-61. PubMed ID: 18696156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Role of X-ray computed tomography in the staging of cervical carcinoma].
Kojima Y
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Mar; 41(3):341-8. PubMed ID: 2732565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Diagnostic imaging in invasive cervical carcinoma: MRI, CT, and ultrasonography].
Michniewicz K; Oellinger J
Zentralbl Gynakol; 2001 Apr; 123(4):222-8. PubMed ID: 11370531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predictive value of computerized tomography in the presurgical evaluation of primary carcinoma of the cervix.
Camilien L; Gordon D; Fruchter RG; Maiman M; Boyce JG
Gynecol Oncol; 1988 Jun; 30(2):209-15. PubMed ID: 3371746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cervical carcinoma: assessment of parametrial invasion and lymph node metastasis with magnetic resonance imaging.
Sheu MH; Chang CY; Wang JH; Yen MS
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei); 2000 Aug; 63(8):634-40. PubMed ID: 10969450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cervical carcinoma: computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative staging.
Subak LL; Hricak H; Powell CB; Azizi L; Stern JL
Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jul; 86(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 7784021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Results of a prospective study with comparison of clinical, endosonographic, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and pathologic staging of advanced gynecologic carcinoma and recurrence.
Houvenaeghel G; Delpero JR; Rosello R; Resbeut M; Viens P; Jacquemier J; Noirclerc M; Guerinel G
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1993 Sep; 177(3):231-6. PubMed ID: 8356495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computed tomographic evaluation of carcinoma of the cervix.
Whitley NO; Brenner DE; Francis A; Villa Santa U; Aisner J; Wiernik PH; Whitley J
Radiology; 1982 Feb; 142(2):439-46. PubMed ID: 7054834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Staging of cervical cancer: comparison between magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography and pelvic examination under anesthesia.
Ho CM; Chien TY; Jeng CM; Tsang YM; Shih BY; Chang SC
J Formos Med Assoc; 1992 Oct; 91(10):982-90. PubMed ID: 1362678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography and endosonography in the local staging of carcinoma of the cervix.
Cobby M; Browning J; Jones A; Whipp E; Goddard P
Br J Radiol; 1990 Sep; 63(753):673-9. PubMed ID: 2205326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of MRI in the management and staging of cancer of the uterine cervix.
Stenstedt K; Hellström AC; Fridsten S; Blomqvist L
Acta Oncol; 2011 Apr; 50(3):420-6. PubMed ID: 21166605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Para-aortic lymphadenectomy in advanced-stage cervical cancer: standard procedure in 2010?].
Uzan C; Gouy S; Pautier P; Haie-Meder C; Duvillard P; Narducci F; Leblanc E; Morice P
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2010 Nov; 38(11):668-71. PubMed ID: 20965771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Pretreatment diagnostic evaluation of cervical cancer].
Lemke U; Hamm B
Rofo; 2009 May; 181(5):433-40. PubMed ID: 19373746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging staging of uterine cervical carcinoma: results of prospective study.
Choi SH; Kim SH; Choi HJ; Park BK; Lee HJ
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2004; 28(5):620-7. PubMed ID: 15480035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic efficacy of diffusion-weighted MRI for pre-operative assessment of myometrial and cervical invasion and pelvic lymph node metastasis in endometrial carcinoma.
Koplay M; Dogan NU; Erdogan H; Sivri M; Erol C; Nayman A; Karabagli P; Paksoy Y; Celik C
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2014 Oct; 58(5):538-46; quiz 648. PubMed ID: 25046775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computed tomography in staging primary uterine cervical carcinoma.
Poon PY
J Can Assoc Radiol; 1983 Jun; 34(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 6885893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with carcinoma of the uterine cervix--3 years' experience].
Bosković V; Glisić A; Petković S
Srp Arh Celok Lek; 1998; 126(5-6):183-7. PubMed ID: 9863378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
