These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10721236)

  • 1. Strategy selection in causal reasoning: when beliefs and covariation collide.
    Fugelsang JA; Thompson VA
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2000 Mar; 54(1):15-32. PubMed ID: 10721236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Belief-based and covariation-based cues affect causal discounting.
    Fugelsang JA; Thompson VA
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2001 Mar; 55(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 11301730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A dual-process model of belief and evidence interactions in causal reasoning.
    Fugelsang JA; Thompson VA
    Mem Cognit; 2003 Jul; 31(5):800-15. PubMed ID: 12956244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of the number of relevant causes on the processing of covariation information in causal reasoning.
    Kim K; Markman AB; Kim TH
    Cogn Process; 2016 Nov; 17(4):399-413. PubMed ID: 27312597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of domain-specific beliefs on decisions and causal judgments.
    Müller SM; Garcia-Retamero R; Galesic M; Maldonado A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Nov; 144(3):472-80. PubMed ID: 24076330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interaction between previous beliefs and cue predictive value in covariation-based causal induction.
    Catena A; Maldonado A; Perales JC; Cándido A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jun; 128(2):339-49. PubMed ID: 18445489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Causal beliefs and empirical evidence.
    Müller SM; Garcia-Retamero R; Cokely E; Maldonado A
    Exp Psychol; 2011; 58(4):324-32. PubMed ID: 21310692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Driven by power? Probe question and presentation format effects on causal judgment.
    Perales JC; Shanks DR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1482-94. PubMed ID: 18980409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cognitive biases in human causal learning.
    Maldonado A; Catena A; Perales JC; Cándido A
    Span J Psychol; 2007 Nov; 10(2):242-50. PubMed ID: 17992950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The environmental malleability of base-rate neglect.
    Turpin MH; Meyers EA; Walker AC; Białek M; Stolz JA; Fugelsang JA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2020 Apr; 27(2):385-391. PubMed ID: 32043220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Causal evidence in risk and policy perceptions: Applying the covariation/mechanism framework.
    Baucum M; John R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 May; 186():90-103. PubMed ID: 29627061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Belief bias is response bias: Evidence from a two-step signal detection model.
    Stephens RG; Dunn JC; Hayes BK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Feb; 45(2):320-332. PubMed ID: 30047766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The meaning and computation of causal power: comment on Cheng (1997) and Novick and Cheng (2004).
    Luhmann CC; Ahn WK
    Psychol Rev; 2005 Jul; 112(3):685-93; discussion 694-707. PubMed ID: 16060763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Expectations and interpretations during causal learning.
    Luhmann CC; Ahn WK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 May; 37(3):568-87. PubMed ID: 21534705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. When fast logic meets slow belief: Evidence for a parallel-processing model of belief bias.
    Trippas D; Thompson VA; Handley SJ
    Mem Cognit; 2017 May; 45(4):539-552. PubMed ID: 28028779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Syllogistic reasoning time: disconfirmation disconfirmed.
    Thompson VA; Striemer CL; Reikoff R; Gunter RW; Campbell JI
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Mar; 10(1):184-9. PubMed ID: 12747506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Neural correlates of causal power judgments.
    Cummins DD
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2014; 8():1014. PubMed ID: 25566033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The SDT model of belief bias: complexity, time, and cognitive ability mediate the effects of believability.
    Trippas D; Handley SJ; Verde MF
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1393-402. PubMed ID: 23565791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using forced choice to test belief bias in syllogistic reasoning.
    Trippas D; Verde MF; Handley SJ
    Cognition; 2014 Dec; 133(3):586-600. PubMed ID: 25218460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The concreteness effect on judgments of learning: Evaluating the contributions of fluency and beliefs.
    Witherby AE; Tauber SK
    Mem Cognit; 2017 May; 45(4):639-650. PubMed ID: 27987115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.