These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10721236)

  • 21. Cue interaction and judgments of causality: contributions of causal and associative processes.
    Tangen JM; Allan LG
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Jan; 32(1):107-24. PubMed ID: 15078048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Spontaneous assimilation of continuous values and temporal information in causal induction.
    Marsh JK; Ahn WK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Mar; 35(2):334-52. PubMed ID: 19271850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Belief inhibition during thinking: not always winning but at least taking part.
    De Neys W; Franssens S
    Cognition; 2009 Oct; 113(1):45-61. PubMed ID: 19703685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Distinguishing genuine from spurious causes: a coherence hypothesis.
    Lien Y; Cheng PW
    Cogn Psychol; 2000 Mar; 40(2):87-137. PubMed ID: 10716875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. How two causes are different from one: the use of (un)conditional information in Simpson's paradox.
    Spellman BA; Price CM; Logan JM
    Mem Cognit; 2001 Mar; 29(2):193-208. PubMed ID: 11352202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The source of belief bias effects in syllogistic reasoning.
    Newstead SE; Pollard P; Evans JS; Allen JL
    Cognition; 1992 Dec; 45(3):257-84. PubMed ID: 1490324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Coincidence judgment in causal reasoning: How coincidental is this?
    Johansen MK; Osman M
    Cogn Psychol; 2020 Aug; 120():101290. PubMed ID: 32200045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Belief bias and relational reasoning.
    Roberts MJ; Sykes ED
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Jan; 56(1):131-53. PubMed ID: 12587899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Expectations affect physical causation judgments.
    Gerstenberg T; Icard T
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 Mar; 149(3):599-607. PubMed ID: 31512904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Integration of individual and social information for decision-making in groups of different sizes.
    Park SA; Goïame S; O'Connor DA; Dreher JC
    PLoS Biol; 2017 Jun; 15(6):e2001958. PubMed ID: 28658252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Asymmetries in predictive and diagnostic reasoning.
    Fernbach PM; Darlow A; Sloman SA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2011 May; 140(2):168-85. PubMed ID: 21219081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The role of mechanism and covariation information in causal belief updating.
    Perales JC; Catena A; Maldonado A; Cándido A
    Cognition; 2007 Dec; 105(3):704-14. PubMed ID: 17239360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Use of prior beliefs in the assignment of causal roles: causal powers versus regularity-based accounts.
    White PA
    Mem Cognit; 1995 Mar; 23(2):243-54. PubMed ID: 7731368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Sense-making under ignorance.
    Johnson SG; Rajeev-Kumar G; Keil FC
    Cogn Psychol; 2016 Sep; 89():39-70. PubMed ID: 27479271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evidence for online processing during causal learning.
    Liu PP; Luhmann CC
    Learn Behav; 2015 Mar; 43(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 25488021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The role of covariation versus mechanism information in causal attribution.
    Ahn WK; Kalish CW; Medin DL; Gelman SA
    Cognition; 1995 Mar; 54(3):299-352. PubMed ID: 7720361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Relations between inductive reasoning and deductive reasoning.
    Heit E; Rotello CM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 May; 36(3):805-12. PubMed ID: 20438276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Self-construal and the processing of covariation information in causal reasoning.
    Kim K; Grimm LR; Markman AB
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Sep; 35(6):1337-43. PubMed ID: 18035631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Making causal judgments from the proportion of confirming instances: the pCI rule.
    White PA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Jul; 29(4):710-27. PubMed ID: 12924869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparability effects in probability judgments.
    Pleskac TJ
    Psychol Sci; 2012 Aug; 23(8):848-54. PubMed ID: 22825358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.