BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10721242)

  • 1. The effect of a maxillary lip bumper on tooth positions.
    Häsler R; Ingervall B
    Eur J Orthod; 2000 Feb; 22(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 10721242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of a lip bumper on lower dental arch dimensions and tooth positions.
    Grossen J; Ingervall B
    Eur J Orthod; 1995 Apr; 17(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 7781721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The effect of maxillary and mandibular lip bumper on teeth and dental arch in late mixed dentition].
    Teng M; Sun F
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2005 Aug; 14(4):348-51. PubMed ID: 16155695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effectiveness of pendulum, K-loop, and distal jet distalization techniques in growing children and its effects on anchor unit: A comparative study.
    Marure PS; Patil RU; Reddy S; Prakash A; Kshetrimayum N; Shukla R
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2016; 34(4):331-40. PubMed ID: 27681396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dental changes and space gained as a result of early treatment of pseudo-Class III malocclusion.
    Gu Y; Rabie AB
    Aust Orthod J; 2000 Mar; 16(1):40-52. PubMed ID: 11201959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mandibular arch changes following nonextraction treatment.
    Waring DT; Pender N; Counihan D
    Aust Orthod J; 2005 Nov; 21(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 16429866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perioral forces and dental changes resulting from mandibular lip bumper treatment.
    O'Donnell S; Nanda RS; Ghosh J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Mar; 113(3):247-55. PubMed ID: 9517714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of a three-dimensional bimetric maxillary distalizing arch.
    Uçem TT; Yüksel S; Okay C; Gülşen A
    Eur J Orthod; 2000 Jun; 22(3):293-8. PubMed ID: 10920561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predictors of postretention stability of mandibular dental arch dimensions in patients treated with a lip bumper during mixed dentition followed by fixed appliances.
    Raucci G; Pachêco-Pereira C; Elyasi M; d'Apuzzo F; Flores-Mir C; Perillo L
    Angle Orthod; 2017 Mar; 87(2):209-214. PubMed ID: 27654628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of the effects of 2 mandibular anchorage systems used with a 3-dimensional bimetric maxillary distalizing arch.
    Okay C; Gülsen A; Keykubat A; Ucem TT; Yüksel S
    World J Orthod; 2006; 7(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 16779970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of lip bumper therapy in the mixed dentition.
    Davidovitch M; McInnis D; Lindauer SJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Jan; 111(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 9009924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mandibular arch perimeter changes with lip bumper treatment.
    Osborn WS; Nanda RS; Currier GF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1991 Jun; 99(6):527-32. PubMed ID: 2038972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lip bumper therapy for gaining arch length.
    Nevant CT; Buschang PH; Alexander RG; Steffen JM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1991 Oct; 100(4):330-6. PubMed ID: 1927983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cephalometric evaluation of molar distalization by hyrax screw used in conjunction with a lip bumper.
    Kucukkeles N; Cakirer B; Mowafi M
    World J Orthod; 2006; 7(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 17009476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficiency of a pendulum appliance for molar distalization related to second and third molar eruption stage.
    Kinzinger GS; Fritz UB; Sander FG; Diedrich PR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Jan; 125(1):8-23. PubMed ID: 14718874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the Jones jig appliance for distal molar movement.
    Brickman CD; Sinha PK; Nanda RS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Nov; 118(5):526-34. PubMed ID: 11094366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Soft tissue, skeletal and dentoalveolar changes following conventional anchorage molar distalization therapy in class II non-growing subjects: a multicentric retrospective study.
    Fontana M; Cozzani M; Caprioglio A
    Prog Orthod; 2012 May; 13(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 22583585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of maxillary molar distalization with the distal jet: a comparison with other contemporary methods.
    Bolla E; Muratore F; Carano A; Bowman SJ
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Oct; 72(5):481-94. PubMed ID: 12401059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.
    Yao CC; Lai EH; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):615-24. PubMed ID: 18984393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Distal movement of maxillary molars using miniscrew anchorage in the buccal interradicular region.
    Yamada K; Kuroda S; Deguchi T; Takano-Yamamoto T; Yamashiro T
    Angle Orthod; 2009 Jan; 79(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 19123698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.