These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10722199)

  • 1. DNA evidence, probabilistic evaluation and collaborative tests.
    Taroni F; Aitken CG
    Forensic Sci Int; 2000 Feb; 108(2):121-43. PubMed ID: 10722199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Probabilistic reasoning in the law. Part 2: Assessment of probabilities and explanation of the value of trace evidence other than DNA.
    Taroni F; Aitken CG
    Sci Justice; 1998; 38(3):179-88. PubMed ID: 9800433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Lies, damned lies, and DNA statistics: DNA match testing Bayes' Theorem, and the criminal courts.
    Jowett C
    Med Sci Law; 2001 Jul; 41(3):194-205. PubMed ID: 11506343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Probabilistic reasoning in the law. Part 1: Assessment of probabilities and explanation of the value of DNA evidence.
    Taroni F; Aitken CG
    Sci Justice; 1998; 38(3):165-77. PubMed ID: 9800432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation and presentation of forensic DNA evidence in European laboratories.
    Taroni F; Lambert JA; Fereday L; Werrett DJ
    Sci Justice; 2002; 42(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 12012646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The likelihood approach to compare populations: a study on DNA evidence and pitfalls of intuitions.
    Taroni F; Aitken CG
    Sci Justice; 1999; 39(4):213-22. PubMed ID: 10795411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Applied forensic epidemiology: the Bayesian evaluation of forensic evidence in vehicular homicide investigation.
    Freeman MD; Rossignol AM; Hand ML
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2009 Feb; 16(2):83-92. PubMed ID: 19135003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Probabilistic graphical models to deal with age estimation of living persons.
    Sironi E; Gallidabino M; Weyermann C; Taroni F
    Int J Legal Med; 2016 Mar; 130(2):475-88. PubMed ID: 25794687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The prosecutor's fallacy--a pitfall in interpreting probabilities in forensic evidence.
    Leung WC
    Med Sci Law; 2002 Jan; 42(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 11848139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of scientific evidence using Bayesian networks.
    Garbolino P; Taroni F
    Forensic Sci Int; 2002 Feb; 125(2-3):149-55. PubMed ID: 11909657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Logical implications of applying the principles of population genetics to the interpretation of DNA profiling evidence.
    Triggs CM; Buckleton JS
    Forensic Sci Int; 2002 Aug; 128(3):108-14. PubMed ID: 12175788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of forensic genetics findings given activity level propositions: A review.
    Taylor D; Kokshoorn B; Biedermann A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Sep; 36():34-49. PubMed ID: 29929059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How the probability of a false positive affects the value of DNA evidence.
    Thompson WC; Taroni F; Aitken CG
    J Forensic Sci; 2003 Jan; 48(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 12570198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing transfer probabilities in a Bayesian interpretation of forensic glass evidence.
    Curran JM; Triggs CM; Buckleton JS; Walsh K; Hicks T
    Sci Justice; 1998; 38(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 9624809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bayesian framework for the evaluation of fiber evidence in a double murder--a case report.
    Causin V; Schiavone S; Marigo A; Carresi P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2004 May; 141(2-3):159-70. PubMed ID: 15062957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Implementing statistical learning methods through Bayesian networks. Part 1: a guide to Bayesian parameter estimation using forensic science data.
    Biedermann A; Taroni F; Bozza S
    Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Dec; 193(1-3):63-71. PubMed ID: 19833464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. DNA commission of the International society for forensic genetics: Assessing the value of forensic biological evidence - Guidelines highlighting the importance of propositions. Part II: Evaluation of biological traces considering activity level propositions.
    Gill P; Hicks T; Butler JM; Connolly E; Gusmão L; Kokshoorn B; Morling N; van Oorschot RAH; Parson W; Prinz M; Schneider PM; Sijen T; Taylor D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jan; 44():102186. PubMed ID: 31677444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. DNA profiling: evaluation of the evidentiary value.
    Bär W
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2003 Mar; 5 Suppl 1():S41-4. PubMed ID: 12935550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bayesian networks for evaluation of evidence from forensic entomology.
    Andersson MG; Sundström A; Lindström A
    Biosecur Bioterror; 2013 Sep; 11 Suppl 1():S64-77. PubMed ID: 23971824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inference about the number of contributors to a DNA mixture: Comparative analyses of a Bayesian network approach and the maximum allele count method.
    Biedermann A; Bozza S; Konis K; Taroni F
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):689-96. PubMed ID: 22534257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.