194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10723105)
1. Use of conditional and marginal odds-ratios for analysing familial aggregation of binary data.
FitzGerald PE; Knuiman MW
Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Mar; 18(3):193-202. PubMed ID: 10723105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. One relative risk versus two odds ratios: implications for meta-analyses involving paired and unpaired binary data.
Zou GY
Clin Trials; 2007; 4(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 17327243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Measuring familial aggregation by using odds-ratio regression models.
Liang KY; Beaty TH
Genet Epidemiol; 1991; 8(6):361-70. PubMed ID: 1806405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Appropriate statistical methods to account for similarities in binary outcomes between fellow eyes.
Katz J; Zeger S; Liang KY
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1994 Apr; 35(5):2461-5. PubMed ID: 8163336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Conditional regression analysis of the exposure-disease odds ratio using known probability-of-exposure values.
Satten GA; Kupper LL
Biometrics; 1993 Jun; 49(2):429-40. PubMed ID: 8369379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating marginal odds ratios.
Austin PC
Stat Med; 2007 Jul; 26(16):3078-94. PubMed ID: 17187347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An extension of Yule's Q to multivariate binary data.
Lipsitz SR; Fitzmaurice G
Biometrics; 1994 Sep; 50(3):847-52. PubMed ID: 7981405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Analysing incomplete longitudinal binary responses: a likelihood-based approach.
Fitzmaurice GM; Laird NM; Lipsitz SR
Biometrics; 1994 Sep; 50(3):601-12. PubMed ID: 7981387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Estimating equations for measures of association between repeated binary responses.
Lipsitz SR; Fitzmaurice GM
Biometrics; 1996 Sep; 52(3):903-12. PubMed ID: 8805760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Marginal modeling of binary cross-over data.
Becker MP; Balagtas CC
Biometrics; 1993 Dec; 49(4):997-1009. PubMed ID: 8117910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Conditioning on the propensity score can result in biased estimation of common measures of treatment effect: a Monte Carlo study.
Austin PC; Grootendorst P; Normand SL; Anderson GM
Stat Med; 2007 Feb; 26(4):754-68. PubMed ID: 16783757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Adjusting for bias and unmeasured confounding in Mendelian randomization studies with binary responses.
Palmer TM; Thompson JR; Tobin MD; Sheehan NA; Burton PR
Int J Epidemiol; 2008 Oct; 37(5):1161-8. PubMed ID: 18463132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Modelling risk when binary outcomes are subject to error.
McInturff P; Johnson WO; Cowling D; Gardner IA
Stat Med; 2004 Apr; 23(7):1095-109. PubMed ID: 15057880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Correction for misclassification of a categorized exposure in binary regression using replication data.
Dalen I; Buonaccorsi JP; Sexton JA; Laake P; Thoresen M
Stat Med; 2009 Nov; 28(27):3386-410. PubMed ID: 19757445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A deficiency of the odds ratio as a measure of effect size.
Newcombe RG
Stat Med; 2006 Dec; 25(24):4235-40. PubMed ID: 16927451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An introduction to statistical methods used in binary outcome modeling.
Nathanson BH; Higgins TL
Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2008 Sep; 12(3):153-66. PubMed ID: 18805850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A computationally simple test of homogeneity of odds ratios for twin data.
Betensky RA; Hudson JI; Jones CA; Hu F; Wang B; Chen C; Xu X
Genet Epidemiol; 2001 Feb; 20(2):228-38. PubMed ID: 11180448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A set of SAS macros for calculating and displaying adjusted odds ratios (with confidence intervals) for continuous covariates in logistic B-spline regression models.
Gregory M; Ulmer H; Pfeiffer KP; Lang S; Strasak AM
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2008 Oct; 92(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 18603325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A simple model for potential use with a misclassified binary outcome in epidemiology.
Duffy SW; Warwick J; Williams AR; Keshavarz H; Kaffashian F; Rohan TE; Nili F; Sadeghi-Hassanabadi A
J Epidemiol Community Health; 2004 Aug; 58(8):712-7. PubMed ID: 15252078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical trials: odds ratios and multiple regression models--why and how to assess them.
Sobh M; Cleophas TJ; Hadj-Chaib A; Zwinderman AH
Am J Ther; 2008; 15(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 18223353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
