139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10724624)
1. New York court rejects liability theory. Megally v. LaPorta.
Hosp Law Newsl; 1999 Dec; 17(2):6-8. PubMed ID: 10724624
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Fear of cancer.
Berlin L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Aug; 183(2):267-72. PubMed ID: 15269009
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Missed breast cancer: the legal factors.
Weir M
J Law Med; 2005 May; 12(4):511-8. PubMed ID: 15957593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Legal Ramifications of Computer-Aided Detection in Mammography.
Mezrich JL; Siegel EL
J Am Coll Radiol; 2015 Jun; 12(6):572-4. PubMed ID: 25547380
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Authors' Reply.
Mezrich JL; Siegel E
J Am Coll Radiol; 2015 Nov; 12(11):1135-6. PubMed ID: 26541129
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Dries v. Gregor: a case study of informed consent doctrine in New York.
Schreiber JA
N Y State Bar J; 1981 Oct; 53(6):431-7. PubMed ID: 16044597
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Archive or Discard Computer-Aided Detection Markings: Two Schools of Thought.
Berlin L
J Am Coll Radiol; 2015 Nov; 12(11):1134-5. PubMed ID: 26541128
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Appellate court restores apparent agency claim. Malanowski v. Jabamoni.
Hosp Law Newsl; 1998 Aug; 15(10):2-6. PubMed ID: 10184962
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the legal risk of a 'missed' cancer in two breastscreen services.
Osborne J; Lee W
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2010 Feb; 54(1):24-5. PubMed ID: 20377711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Liability issues with the Papanicolaou smear: general legal background.
Kline TJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Mar; 121(3):250-2. PubMed ID: 9111110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The early diagnosis project: a collaborative approach to risk management.
Bartlett EE; Holman KI; Bobetic K; Douglass M; Johnson L; Machnowski G; Rehmar MI
J Healthc Risk Manag; 1999; 19(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 10538003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Medicolegal-Malpractice and Ethical Issues in Radiology
Berlin L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Mar; 212(3):W92. PubMed ID: 30793940
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Medicolegal-Malpractice and Ethical Issues in Radiology
Berlin L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Feb; 210(2):W92-W93. PubMed ID: 29355404
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Breast screening and failure to diagnose breast cancer.
Bird S
Aust Fam Physician; 2009 Apr; 38(4):237-8. PubMed ID: 19350074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radiologic errors and malpractice: a blurry distinction.
Berlin L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Sep; 189(3):517-22. PubMed ID: 17715094
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Medicolegal--Malpractice and ethical issues in radiology. Electronic health records and malpractice litigation: malpractice pitfalls.
Berlin L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Oct; 203(4):W447-8. PubMed ID: 25247975
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Trends in pathology malpractice claims.
Troxel DB
Am J Surg Pathol; 2012 Jan; 36(1):e1-5. PubMed ID: 22173121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Legal liability of the radiologist in missed breast cancer diagnosis].
Mortier M; Villeirs G
JBR-BTR; 2003; 86(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 12693376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [What we can learn from a case of medical malpractice--case of biliary atresia].
Kuwabara H; Kobayashi H; Makita S; Okabe M; Ryo S
Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 2008 May; 109(3):167-8. PubMed ID: 18536323
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Protect yourself from diagnosis-related lawsuits.
Johnson LJ
Med Econ; 2010 Apr; 87(8):30. PubMed ID: 20535943
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
