These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10724732)
1. Digital x-ray: unwavering commitment collides with monumental challenges. Freiherr G Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1999 Nov; Suppl Digital():D4-7. PubMed ID: 10724732 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Digital detectors in mammography. A technological overview. Dhaenens F JBR-BTR; 2000 Apr; 83(2):84-7. PubMed ID: 10859905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. For mammography, it's digital vs. screen-film. D'Orsi CJ; Karellas A Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1999 Nov; Suppl Digital():D16-8. PubMed ID: 10724730 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Flat-panel detectors in X-ray systems]. Spahn M; Heer V; Freytag R Radiologe; 2003 May; 43(5):340-50. PubMed ID: 12764582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Obstacles remain on road to digital mammography. Johnson M Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1999 Nov; Suppl Digital():D19-21. PubMed ID: 10724731 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Fundamentals of digital mammography: physics, technology and practical considerations. Smith A Radiol Manage; 2003; 25(5):18-24, 26-31; quiz 32-4. PubMed ID: 14603590 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The application of image quality measurements for digital angiography. Peterzol A; Padovani R; Quai E; Vano E; Prieto C; Aviles P Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):38-43. PubMed ID: 16461533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [X-ray film evaluation with a new equidensitometric film (author's transl)]. Müllenberg W Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Nuklearmed; 1974 Oct; 121(4):512-7. PubMed ID: 4373351 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Digital mammography. Lewin JM; D'Orsi CJ; Hendrick RE Radiol Clin North Am; 2004 Sep; 42(5):871-84, vi. PubMed ID: 15337422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical evaluation of a new set of image quality criteria for mammography. Grahn A; Hemdal B; Andersson I; Ruschin M; Thilander-Klang A; Börjesson S; Tingberg A; Mattsson S; Håkansson M; Båth M; Månsson LG; Medin J; Wanninger F; Panzer W Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):389-94. PubMed ID: 15933143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Conventional and digital radiology]. Lacroix P; Lorcy P; Sevestre L J Radiol; 1995; 76(5 Suppl):25-9. PubMed ID: 7473353 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [New realities in the modern X-ray technology]. Blinov NN; Mazurov AI Med Tekh; 2003; (5):3-6. PubMed ID: 14603840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Digital subtraction angiography: technology, equipment, and techniques. Ovitt TW; Newell JD Med Instrum; 1986; 20(4):199-205. PubMed ID: 3531783 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison between objective and subjective image quality measurements for a full field digital mammography system. Marshall NW Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2441-63. PubMed ID: 16675862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Digital radiography in mammography. Pastore G; Belli P; Ceccarelli D; Stigliano L Rays; 1992; 17(4):539-46. PubMed ID: 1289972 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Quality assurance of digital mammography X-ray system]. Hu X; Lu G Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2010 Apr; 35(4):390-4. PubMed ID: 20448366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Computer processing of x-ray films. Preliminary report on arteriograms. Cortivo P; Dalla Palma L; Delcaro L; Nicolao P; Sicuranza G Radiol Clin (Basel); 1978; 47(3):195-203. PubMed ID: 663088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]