These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10724775)
1. Observations on medical device design, Part II: Good practice. Alexander K; Clarkson J; Bishop D Med Device Technol; 1999 Oct; 10(8):24-8. PubMed ID: 10724775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Observations on medical device design, Part I: Current practice. Clarkson J; Alexander K; Bishop D Med Device Technol; 1999 Sep; 10(7):28-31. PubMed ID: 10623354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Risk analysis: a standard approach? (Part I). Donawa ME Med Device Technol; 1995 Apr; 6(3):11-4. PubMed ID: 10172443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Risk analysis: a standard approach? (Part II). Donawa ME Med Device Technol; 1995 May; 6(4):10-2. PubMed ID: 10155382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Working draft of the FDA GMP final rule (Part II). Donawa ME Med Device Technol; 1995 Nov; 6(9):9-12. PubMed ID: 10158131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Notified Body guidance on clinical evaluation. Donawa M Med Device Technol; 2000 Sep; 11(7):26-8. PubMed ID: 15326742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation and Six Sigma. Barry E Med Device Technol; 2008; 19(7):36, 38-40. PubMed ID: 19133627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Safety by design in electromedical equipment, Part II. Loznen SP Med Device Technol; 1995 Dec; 6(10):28-30. PubMed ID: 10158121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Review of the Medical Device Directive. Donawa M Med Device Technol; 2003 Mar; 14(2):20-3. PubMed ID: 12698694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Designing the design phase of critical care devices: a cognitive approach. Malhotra S; Laxmisan A; Keselman A; Zhang J; Patel VL J Biomed Inform; 2005 Feb; 38(1):34-50. PubMed ID: 15694884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Decision process to assess medical equipment for hyperbaric use. Burman F; Sheffield R; Posey K Undersea Hyperb Med; 2009; 36(2):137-44. PubMed ID: 19462753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Meeting European and US requirements for design and development documentation, Part I. Donawa ME Med Device Technol; 1996 Nov; 7(9):12-5. PubMed ID: 10163673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical investigation of medical devices. Stewart RR Med Device Technol; 1995 Jun; 6(5):36-40. PubMed ID: 10155392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Packaging matters--part II: material selection. Lewis R Med Device Technol; 1991 Mar; 2(2):10-3. PubMed ID: 10149433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Medical devices; classification for medical washer and medical washer-disinfector. Final rule. Food and Drug Administration, HHS Fed Regist; 2002 Nov; 67(221):69119-21. PubMed ID: 12437015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Safety by design in electromedical equipment: Part I. Loznen SP Med Device Technol; 1995 Nov; 6(9):24-30. PubMed ID: 10158129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Considering risk. Reichman G Med Device Technol; 1999; 10(6):17-9. PubMed ID: 10623346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The quality planning conundrum. Donawa ME Med Device Technol; 1999; 10(6):14-6. PubMed ID: 10623345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Classification of active medical devices according to the Medical Device Directive. Bünger M; Tümmler HP Med Device Technol; 1994 Mar; 5(2):33-9. PubMed ID: 10184169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]