These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10725493)

  • 1. Cost-benefit analysis of prenatal diagnosis for Down syndrome using the British or the American approach.
    Vintzileos AM; Ananth CV; Smulian JC; Day-Salvatore DL; Beazoglou T; Knuppel RA
    Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Apr; 95(4):577-83. PubMed ID: 10725493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost effectiveness, the economic considerations of prenatal screening strategies for trisomy 21 in the Czech Republic.
    Dhaifalah I; Májek O
    Ceska Gynekol; 2012 Feb; 77(1):39-51. PubMed ID: 22536640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A cost-effectiveness analysis of prenatal screening strategies for Down syndrome.
    Odibo AO; Stamilio DM; Nelson DB; Sehdev HM; Macones GA
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Sep; 106(3):562-8. PubMed ID: 16135588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. First- and second-trimester evaluation of risk for Down syndrome.
    Ball RH; Caughey AB; Malone FD; Nyberg DA; Comstock CH; Saade GR; Berkowitz RL; Gross SJ; Dugoff L; Craigo SD; Timor-Tritsch IE; Carr SR; Wolfe HM; Emig D; D'Alton ME;
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jul; 110(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 17601890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy in singleton pregnancies.
    Chitayat D; Langlois S; Douglas Wilson R; ;
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2011 Jul; 33(7):736-750. PubMed ID: 21749752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An outcomes analysis of five prenatal screening strategies for trisomy 21 in women younger than 35 years.
    Biggio JR; Morris TC; Owen J; Stringer JS
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Mar; 190(3):721-9. PubMed ID: 15042005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An economic evaluation of first-trimester genetic sonography for prenatal detection of Down syndrome.
    Vintzileos AM; Ananth CV; Fisher AJ; Smulian JC; Day-Salvatore D; Beazoglou T
    Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Apr; 91(4):535-9. PubMed ID: 9540936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. SURUSS in perspective.
    Wald NJ; Rodeck C; Hackshaw AK; Rudnicka A
    BJOG; 2004 Jun; 111(6):521-31. PubMed ID: 15198778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prenatal screening for Down syndrome in Australia: costs and benefits of current and novel screening strategies.
    O'Leary P; Maxwell S; Murch A; Hendrie D
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2013 Oct; 53(5):425-33. PubMed ID: 24090461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Screening for Down syndrome using first-trimester ultrasound and second-trimester maternal serum markers in a low-risk population: a prospective longitudinal study.
    Audibert F; Dommergues M; Benattar C; Taieb J; Thalabard JC; Frydman R
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Jul; 18(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 11489221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A cost-effectiveness analysis comparing two different strategies in advanced maternal age: Combined first-trimester screening and maternal blood cell-free DNA testing.
    Pan M; Huang LY; Zhen L; Li DZ
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Aug; 57(4):536-540. PubMed ID: 30122574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Effects, safety and cost-benefit analysis of Down syndrome screening in first trimester].
    Shengmou L; Min C; Chenhong W; Shengli L; Jiansheng X; Hui Y; Dinghao L; Xiaoxia W; Wei W; Hongyun Z; Haiyan T
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2014 May; 49(5):325-30. PubMed ID: 25030727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prenatal screening for and diagnosis of aneuploidy in twin pregnancies.
    Audibert F; Gagnon A; ;
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2011 Jul; 33(7):754-67. PubMed ID: 21749753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Screening for Down's syndrome: effects, safety, and cost effectiveness of first and second trimester strategies.
    Gilbert RE; Augood C; Gupta R; Ades AE; Logan S; Sculpher M; van Der Meulen JH
    BMJ; 2001 Aug; 323(7310):423-5. PubMed ID: 11520837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Screening for Down syndrome using first-trimester combined screening followed by second trimester ultrasound examination in an unselected population].
    Rozenberg P; Bussières L; Chevret S; Bernard JP; Malagrida L; Cuckle H; Chabry C; Durand-Zaleski I; Bidat L; Lacroix I; Moulis M; Roger M; Jacquemot MC; Bault JP; Boukobza P; Boccara P; Vialat F; Giudicelli Y; Ville Y
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2007 Apr; 35(4):303-11. PubMed ID: 17350315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cost-benefit analysis of prenatal diagnosis for Down syndrome using the British or the American approach.
    Walker M; Pandya P
    Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Sep; 96(3):481. PubMed ID: 11001699
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nuchal translucency and first trimester biochemical markers for down syndrome screening: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Caughey AB; Kuppermann M; Norton ME; Washington AE
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Nov; 187(5):1239-45. PubMed ID: 12439512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Screening for Down syndrome using first-trimester combined screening followed by second-trimester ultrasound examination in an unselected population.
    Rozenberg P; Bussières L; Chevret S; Bernard JP; Malagrida L; Cuckle H; Chabry C; Durand-Zaleski I; Bidat L; Lacroix I; Moulis M; Roger M; Jacquemot MC; Bault JP; Boukobza P; Boccara P; Vialard F; Giudicelli Y; Ville Y
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Nov; 195(5):1379-87. PubMed ID: 16723105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Practical strategies in contingent sequential screening for Down syndrome.
    Benn P; Wright D; Cuckle H
    Prenat Diagn; 2005 Aug; 25(8):645-52. PubMed ID: 16049988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. First-trimester Down syndrome screening using dried blood biochemistry and nuchal translucency.
    Krantz DA; Hallahan TW; Orlandi F; Buchanan P; Larsen JW; Macri JN
    Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Aug; 96(2):207-13. PubMed ID: 10908764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.