These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10725652)

  • 21. Behavioral economics of concurrent ethanol-sucrose and sucrose reinforcement in the rat: effects of altering variable-ratio requirements.
    Petry NM; Heyman GM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1995 Nov; 64(3):331-59. PubMed ID: 8551192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Resurgence and alternative-reinforcer magnitude.
    Craig AR; Browning KO; Nall RW; Marshall CM; Shahan TA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 Mar; 107(2):218-233. PubMed ID: 28194793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Spontaneous recovery and dishabituation of ethanol-reinforced responding in alcohol-preferring rats.
    Murphy ES; McSweeney FK; Kowal BP; McDonald J; Wiediger RV
    Exp Clin Psychopharmacol; 2006 Nov; 14(4):471-82. PubMed ID: 17115875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of inter-food interval on the variety effect in an instrumental food-seeking task. Clarifying the role of habituation.
    Thrailkill EA; Epstein LH; Bouton ME
    Appetite; 2015 Jan; 84():43-53. PubMed ID: 25261732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Responding for sucrose and wheel-running reinforcement: effects of sucrose concentration and wheel-running reinforcer duration.
    Belke TW; Hancock SD
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Mar; 79(2):243-65. PubMed ID: 12822690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Reinforcer magnitude (sucrose concentration) and the matching law theory of response strength.
    Heyman GM; Monaghan MM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1994 May; 61(3):505-16. PubMed ID: 16812733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Ethanol- and sucrose-reinforced appetitive and consummatory responding in HAD1, HAD2, and P rats.
    Czachowski CL; Samson HH
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2002 Nov; 26(11):1653-61. PubMed ID: 12436053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effects of intraaccumbens injections of dopamine agonists and antagonists on sucrose and sucrose-ethanol reinforced responding.
    Hodge CW; Samson HH; Tolliver GA; Haraguchi M
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1994 May; 48(1):141-50. PubMed ID: 7913224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Ethanol regulated preference in rats.
    Heyman GM
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1993; 112(2-3):259-69. PubMed ID: 7871029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effect of prefeeding on fixed-ratio pausing is jointly determined by past and upcoming reinforcer magnitudes.
    Galuska CM; Yadon KA
    Behav Processes; 2011 Jan; 86(1):156-9. PubMed ID: 20804830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The role of response-contingent incentives in lithium chloride-mediated suppression of an operant response.
    Meachum CL
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 1990 May; 42(2):175-95. PubMed ID: 2164238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Time-, schedule-, and reinforcer-dependent effects of pimozide and amphetamine.
    Phillips G; Willner P; Sampson D; Nunn J; Muscat R
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1991; 104(1):125-31. PubMed ID: 1881998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Ethanol reinforcement in nondeprived mice: effects of abstinence and naltrexone.
    Middaugh LD; Lee AM; Bandy AL
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2000 Aug; 24(8):1172-9. PubMed ID: 10968654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Gestational exposure to methylmercury retards choice in transition in aging rats.
    Newland MC; Reile PA; Langston JL
    Neurotoxicol Teratol; 2004; 26(2):179-94. PubMed ID: 15019952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Automatic reinforcement from operant wheel-running undermines temporal control by fixed-interval schedules of reinforcement.
    Belke TW; Pierce WD; Welsh TM
    Behav Processes; 2018 Dec; 157():91-101. PubMed ID: 30219288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of qualitatively different reinforcers on the parameters of the response-strength equation.
    Petry NM; Heyman GM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1994 Jan; 61(1):97-106. PubMed ID: 8126394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Rat toys, reinforcers, and response strength: An examination of the Re parameter in Herrnstein's equation.
    Petry NM; Heyman GM
    Behav Processes; 1997 Jan; 39(1):39-52. PubMed ID: 24896708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Within-session changes in responding when rate and duration of reinforcement vary.
    Cannon CB; McSweeney FK
    Behav Processes; 1995 Sep; 34(3):285-92. PubMed ID: 24897661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Attenuation of sucrose reinforcement in dopamine D1 receptor deficient mice.
    El-Ghundi M; O'Dowd BF; Erclik M; George SR
    Eur J Neurosci; 2003 Feb; 17(4):851-62. PubMed ID: 12603275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Dopamine receptors in the medial prefrontal cortex influence ethanol and sucrose-reinforced responding.
    Hodge CW; Chappelle AM; Samson HH
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 1996 Dec; 20(9):1631-8. PubMed ID: 8986215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.