BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

316 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10726500)

  • 1. A longitudinal three-dimensional evaluation of the growth pattern in hemifacial microsomia treated by mandibular distraction osteogenesis: a preliminary report.
    Kusnoto B; Figueroa AA; Polley JW
    J Craniofac Surg; 1999 Nov; 10(6):480-6. PubMed ID: 10726500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ten-year follow-up of a patient with hemifacial microsomia treated with distraction osteogenesis and orthodontics: an implant analysis.
    Işeri H; Kişnişci R; Altuğ-Ataç AT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Aug; 134(2):296-304. PubMed ID: 18675213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Midfacial growth after costochondral graft construction of the mandibular ramus in hemifacial microsomia.
    Padwa BL; Mulliken JB; Maghen A; Kaban LB
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1998 Feb; 56(2):122-7; discussion 127-8. PubMed ID: 9461132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The determinants of successful distraction osteogenesis of the mandible in hemifacial microsomia from longitudinal results.
    Baek SH; Kim S
    J Craniofac Surg; 2005 Jul; 16(4):549-58. PubMed ID: 16077297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cephalometric evaluation of the craniofacial complex in patients treated with an intraoral distraction osteogenesis device: a long-term study.
    Chow A; Lee HF; Trahar M; Kawamoto H; Vastardis H; Ting K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):724-31. PubMed ID: 19061798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cephalometric evaluation of the craniofacial complex in patients treated with an intraoral distraction osteogenesis device: a preliminary report.
    Trahar M; Sheffield R; Kawamoto H; Lee HF; Ting K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Dec; 124(6):639-50. PubMed ID: 14666076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Distraction osteogenesis: its application in severe mandibular deformities in hemifacial microsomia.
    Polley JW; Figueroa AA
    J Craniofac Surg; 1997 Sep; 8(5):422-30. PubMed ID: 9482086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of skeletal and soft-tissue changes following unilateral mandibular distraction osteogenesis.
    Altug-Atac AT; Grayson BH; McCarthy JG
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2008 May; 121(5):1751-1759. PubMed ID: 18454000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Long-term stability and growth following unilateral mandibular distraction in growing children with craniofacial microsomia.
    Shetye PR; Grayson BH; Mackool RJ; McCarthy JG
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 Sep; 118(4):985-995. PubMed ID: 16980861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Maxillary-driven simultaneous maxillo-mandibular distraction for hemifacial microsomia.
    Nakajima H; Sakamoto Y; Tamada I; Ogata H; Kishi K; Sakamoto T
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2011 Dec; 39(8):549-53. PubMed ID: 21195627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intraoral distraction osteogenesis of the mandible in hemifacial microsomia.
    Rachmiel A; Manor R; Peled M; Laufer D
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Jul; 59(7):728-33. PubMed ID: 11429728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Response of ramus following vertical lengthening with distraction osteogenesis.
    Tuzuner-Oncul AM; Kisnisci RS
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2011 Sep; 39(6):420-4. PubMed ID: 21145754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Changes in width of lower face after unilateral mandibular distraction osteogenesis.
    Tan W; Yu B; Niu F; Gui L
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Jan; 23(1):94-7. PubMed ID: 22337382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Two-year follow-up of distraction osteogenesis: its effect on mandibular ramus height in hemifacial microsomia.
    Marquez IM; Fish LC; Stella JP
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Feb; 117(2):130-9. PubMed ID: 10672212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Three-dimensional virtual-surgery simulation-assisted asymmetric bilateral mandibular distraction osteogenesis for a patient with bilateral condylar fractures.
    Kim MJ; Seo J; Kim DK; Baek SH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Jan; 151(1):186-200. PubMed ID: 28024774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mandibular distraction combined with orthognathic techniques for the correction of severe adult mandibular hypoplasia.
    Yin L; Tang X; Shi L; Yin H; Zhang Z
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Nov; 25(6):1947-52. PubMed ID: 25377953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Longitudinal results of mandibular distraction osteogenesis in hemifacial microsomia.
    Huisinga-Fischer CE; Vaandrager JM; Prahl-Andersen B
    J Craniofac Surg; 2003 Nov; 14(6):924-33. PubMed ID: 14600637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Theoretical considerations for the surgical correction of mandibular deformity in hemifacial microsomia patients using multifocal distraction osteogenesis.
    Kunz C; Brauchli L; Moehle T; Rahn B; Hammer B
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Mar; 61(3):364-8. PubMed ID: 12618978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Distraction osteogenesis of the mandibular ramus in hemifacial microsomia].
    Yang ZC; Wang X; Yi B; Li ZL; Liang C; Wang XX
    Zhonghua Zheng Xing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Mar; 25(2):104-7. PubMed ID: 19558162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Surgery-First Orthognathic Surgery for Severe Facial Asymmetry Combined With Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis Using a Three-Dimensional Internal Distractor.
    Watanabe Y; Sasaki R; Matsuno I; Akizuki T
    J Craniofac Surg; 2019 Jan; 30(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 30507886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.