92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10726627)
1. ASCUS: comparative follow-up results related to previous SIL diagnosis.
Alameda F; Fuste P; Conangla M; Gimferrer E; Soler I; Antorn MT; Persico S; Carreras R; Serrano S
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2000; 21(1):81-3. PubMed ID: 10726627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. ASCUS on cervical cytologic smears. Clinical significance.
Yang M; Zachariah S
J Reprod Med; 1997 Jun; 42(6):329-31. PubMed ID: 9219118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnosis and survey of abnormal/atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions: a retrospective study.
Giudice A; Rizzo M; Rossi RT; Bonaffini O; Buda CA; Pettineo G
Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(2B):1195-9. PubMed ID: 10810421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: is it worthwhile to qualify them further?
Sodhani P; Gupta S; Sehgal A; Singh V; Khan IU; Mitra AB
Indian J Cancer; 2003; 40(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 14716128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of cytologic follow-up as the recommended management for patients with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.
Alanen KW; Elit LM; Molinaro PA; McLachlin CM
Cancer; 1998 Feb; 84(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 9500646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Colposcopic and histologic findings in women with a cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
Yarandi F; Izadi Mood N; Mirashrafi F; Eftekhar Z
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Dec; 44(6):514-6. PubMed ID: 15598287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical impact of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. A cytohistologic comparison.
Lousuebsakul V; Knutsen SM; Gram IT; Akin MR
Acta Cytol; 2000; 44(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 10667155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-term follow-up of women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS).
Emerson RE; Puzanov A; Brunnemer C; Younger C; Cramer H
Diagn Cytopathol; 2002 Sep; 27(3):153-7. PubMed ID: 12203862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Is it possible to define a better ASCUS class in cervicovaginal screening? A review of 187 cases.
Guerrini L; Sama D; Visani M; Cotignoli T; Sintoni C; Maioli P; Lanzanova G; Schincaglia P
Acta Cytol; 2001; 45(4):532-6. PubMed ID: 11480714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Endocervical curettage when colposcopic examination is satisfactory and normal.
Williams DL; Dietrich C; McBroom J
Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jun; 95(6 Pt 1):801-3. PubMed ID: 10831970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Qualifiers of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance help in patient management.
Collins LC; Wang HH; Abu-Jawdeh GM
Mod Pathol; 1996 Jun; 9(6):677-81. PubMed ID: 8782207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. ASCUS and AGUS criteria. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.
Solomon D; Frable WJ; Vooijs GP; Wilbur DC; Amma NS; Collins RJ; Davey DD; Knight BK; Luff RD; Meisels A; Navin J; Rosenthal DL; Sauer T; Stoler M; Suprun HZ; Yamauchi K
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 9479320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance in women over 55. Comparison with the general population and implications for management.
Rader AE; Rose PG; Rodriguez M; Mansbacher S; Pitlik D; Abdul-Karim FW
Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(3):357-62. PubMed ID: 10349362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is colposcopic biopsy overused among women with a cytological diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS)?
Lousuebsakul V; Knutsen SM; Singh PN; Gram IT
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2003; 12(6):553-9. PubMed ID: 13678510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. ThinPrep Pap Test: performance and biopsy follow-up in a university hospital.
Carpenter AB; Davey DD
Cancer; 1999 Jun; 87(3):105-12. PubMed ID: 10385440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [ASCUS in screening].
Caprara L; Monari F; De Bianchi PS; Amadori A; Bondi A
Pathologica; 2001 Dec; 93(6):645-50. PubMed ID: 11785115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Appraisal of the modalities used to evaluate an initial abnormal Papanicolaou smear.
Higgins RV; Hall JB; McGee JA; Laurent S; Alvarez RD; Partridge EE
Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Aug; 84(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 8041525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Significance of a diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance for Papanicolaou smears in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women.
Keating JT; Wang HH
Cancer; 2001 Apr; 93(2):100-5. PubMed ID: 11309774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Papanicolaou tests diagnosed as atypical by a cytotechnologist and downgraded to benign by a pathologist: a measure of laboratory quality.
Condel JL; Mahood LK; Grzybicki DM; Sturgis CD; Raab SS
Am J Clin Pathol; 2002 Apr; 117(4):534-40. PubMed ID: 11939726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical Significance of a cervical cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Favoring a reactive process or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Gonzalez D; Hernandez E; Anderson L; Heller P; Atkinson BF
J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):719-23. PubMed ID: 9026557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
