92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10726627)
21. Should the cytologic diagnosis of "atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance" be qualified? An assessment including comparison between conventional and liquid-based technologies.
Anton RC; Ramzy I; Schwartz MR; Younes P; Chakraborty S; Mody DR
Cancer; 2001 Apr; 93(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 11309773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Rare atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS): a clinically significant diagnosis?
Hoerl HD; Roth-Cline MD; Shalkham JE; Pfister J; Stewart J; Guo Z; De Las Casas LE; Caya JG; Kurtycz DF
Diagn Cytopathol; 2002 Jul; 27(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 12112807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Clinical experience in a Turkish university hospital.
Ergeneli MH; Duran EH; Ergin T; Demirhan B; Erdogan M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2001 May; 96(1):108-10. PubMed ID: 11311771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Reducing or eliminating use of the category of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance decreases the diagnostic accuracy of the Papanicolaou smear.
Pitman MB; Cibas ES; Powers CN; Renshaw AA; Frable WJ
Cancer; 2002 Jun; 96(3):128-34. PubMed ID: 12115299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: interlaboratory comparison and quality assurance monitors.
Davey DD; Naryshkin S; Nielsen ML; Kline TS
Diagn Cytopathol; 1994 Dec; 11(4):390-6. PubMed ID: 7895579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. PAPNET-directed rescreening of cervicovaginal smears: a study of 101 cases of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
Ryan MR; Stastny JF; Remmers R; Pedigo MA; Cahill LA; Frable WJ
Am J Clin Pathol; 1996 Jun; 105(6):711-8. PubMed ID: 8659445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: a comparative review of original and automated rescreen diagnosis of cervicovaginal smears with long term follow-up.
Stastny JF; Remmers RE; London WB; Pedigo MA; Cahill LA; Ryan M; Frable WJ
Cancer; 1997 Dec; 81(6):348-53. PubMed ID: 9438460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: A cytohistological study in a colposcopy clinic.
Ettler HC; Joseph MG; Downing PA; Suskin NG; Wright VC
Diagn Cytopathol; 1999 Sep; 21(3):211-6. PubMed ID: 10450110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Colposcopic evaluation after a repeat atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) smear.
Gerber S; De Grandi P; Petignat P; Mihaescu A; Delaloye JF
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2001 Dec; 75(3):251-5. PubMed ID: 11728485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Incidence and predictors of cervical dysplasia in patients with minimally abnormal Papanicolaou smears.
Kobelin MH; Kobelin CG; Burke L; Lavin P; Niloff JM; Kim YB
Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Sep; 92(3):356-9. PubMed ID: 9721769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. A cytohistologic study of 52 cases.
Auger M; Charbonneau M; Arseneau J
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(6):1671-5. PubMed ID: 9390122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Management of ASCUS findings in Papanicolaou smears. A retrospective study.
Iavazzo C; Boutas I; Grigoriadis C; Vrachnis N; Salakos N
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2012; 33(6):605-9. PubMed ID: 23327054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effect of HIV infection on atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
Duerr A; Paramsothy P; Jamieson DJ; Heilig CM; Klein RS; Cu-Uvin S; Schuman P; Anderson JR;
Clin Infect Dis; 2006 Mar; 42(6):855-61. PubMed ID: 16477565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Colposcopic verification of cytologic smears containing atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance].
Pityński K; Basta A; Szczudrawa A; Strama M; Piwowarska E
Przegl Lek; 1999; 56(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 10375923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Management of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions during pregnancy.
Jain AG; Higgins RV; Boyle MJ
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Aug; 177(2):298-302. PubMed ID: 9290443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Stratification of the risk of association with, or progression to, squamous intraepithelial lesions based on morphologic subcategorization.
Sheils LA; Wilbur DC
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(4):1065-72. PubMed ID: 9250300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance qualified: a follow-up study.
Kline MJ; Davey DD
Diagn Cytopathol; 1996 Jun; 14(4):380-4. PubMed ID: 8725142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Current laboratory practices of participants in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory. Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology.
Davey DD; Nielsen ML; Naryshkin S; Robb JA; Cohen T; Kline TS
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1996 May; 120(5):440-4. PubMed ID: 8639046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Evaluation of cytological screening for cancers and precancerous lesions of the cervix].
Boman F; Duhamel A; Trinh QD; Deken V; Leroy JL; Beuscart R
Bull Cancer; 2003 Jul; 90(7):643-7. PubMed ID: 12957806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Reactive cellular change: is there an increased risk for squamous intraepithelial lesions?
Barr Soofer S; Sidawy MK
Cancer; 1997 Jun; 81(3):144-7. PubMed ID: 9196012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
