These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10727351)

  • 1. A Hierarchical Structural Model for the Interpretation of Mercury Porosimetry and Nitrogen Sorption.
    Rigby SP
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 2000 Apr; 224(2):382-396. PubMed ID: 10727351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Characterization of Macroscopic Structural Disorder in Porous Media Using Mercury Porosimetry.
    Rigby SP; Fletcher RS; Riley SN
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 2001 Aug; 240(1):190-210. PubMed ID: 11446801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of mercury contact angle, surface tension, and retraction mechanism on the interpretation of mercury porosimetry data.
    Rigby SP; Edler KJ
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 2002 Jun; 250(1):175-90. PubMed ID: 16290649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A statistical model for the heterogeneous structure of porous catalyst pellets.
    Rigby SP; Daut S
    Adv Colloid Interface Sci; 2002 Jun; 98(2):87-119. PubMed ID: 12144099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Determination of the location of coke in catalysts by a novel NMR-based, liquid-porosimetry approach.
    Gopinathan N; Greaves M; Lowe JP; Wood J; Rigby SP
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 2012 Sep; 381(1):164-70. PubMed ID: 22727405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Textural characterization of native and n-alky-bonded silica monoliths by mercury intrusion/extrusion, inverse size exclusion chromatography and nitrogen adsorption.
    Thommes M; Skudas R; Unger KK; Lubda D
    J Chromatogr A; 2008 May; 1191(1-2):57-66. PubMed ID: 18423477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Structural and Transport Properties of Alumina Porous Membranes from Process-Based and Statistical Reconstruction Techniques.
    Kainourgiakis ME; Kikkinides ES; Steriotis TA; Stubos AK; Tzevelekos KP; Kanellopoulos NK
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 2000 Nov; 231(1):158-167. PubMed ID: 11082260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Use of mercury porosimetry, assisted by nitrogen adsorption in the investigation of the pore structure of tablets].
    Szepes A; Kovács J; Szabóné Revész P
    Acta Pharm Hung; 2006; 76(3):119-25. PubMed ID: 17094658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Combining mercury thermoporometry with integrated gas sorption and mercury porosimetry to improve accuracy of pore-size distributions for disordered solids.
    Bafarawa B; Nepryahin A; Ji L; Holt EM; Wang J; Rigby SP
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 2014 Jul; 426():72-9. PubMed ID: 24863767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sequentially Compressive and Intrusive Mechanisms in Mercury Porosimetry of Carbon Blacks.
    Pirard R; Sahouli B; Blacher S; Pirard J
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 1999 Sep; 217(1):216-217. PubMed ID: 10441434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Angstrom-to-millimeter characterization of sedimentary rock microstructure.
    Radlinski AP; Ioannidis MA; Hinde AL; Hainbuchner M; Baron M; Rauch H; Kline SR
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 2004 Jun; 274(2):607-12. PubMed ID: 15144836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fractal Analysis of Mercury Porosimetry Data in the Framework of the Thermodynamic Method.
    Sahouli B; Blacher S; Pirard R; Brouers F
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 1999 Jun; 214(2):450-454. PubMed ID: 10339387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mercury Porosimetry: Contact Angle Hysteresis of Materials with Controlled Pore Structure.
    Salmas C; Androutsopoulos G
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 2001 Jul; 239(1):178-189. PubMed ID: 11397062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantification of Spatial Correlation in Porous Media and Its Effect on Mercury Porosimetry.
    Bryant S; Mason G; Mellor D
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 1996 Jan; 177(1):88-100. PubMed ID: 10479420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spatial distribution of coke residues in porous catalyst pellets analyzed by field-cycling relaxometry and parameter imaging.
    Stapf S; Ren X; Talnishnikh E; Blümich B
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Feb; 23(2):383-6. PubMed ID: 15833654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Simulation of nonwetting phase entrapment within porous media using magnetic resonance imaging.
    Watt-Smith MJ; Rigby SP; Chudek JA; Fletcher RS
    Langmuir; 2006 May; 22(11):5180-8. PubMed ID: 16700611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. MF-DFT and experimental investigations of the origins of hysteresis in mercury porosimetry of silica materials.
    Rigby SP; Chigada PI
    Langmuir; 2010 Jan; 26(1):241-8. PubMed ID: 19670898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modeling mercury porosimetry using statistical mechanics.
    Porcheron F; Monson PA; Thommes M
    Langmuir; 2004 Jul; 20(15):6482-9. PubMed ID: 15248740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Characterization and structural investigation of fractal porous-silica over an extremely wide scale range of pore size.
    Ono Y; Mayama H; Furó I; Sagidullin AI; Matsushima K; Ura H; Uchiyama T; Tsujii K
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 2009 Aug; 336(1):215-25. PubMed ID: 19406424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Determination of the distribution of consolidants and interpretation of mercury porosimetry data in a sandstone porous network using LSCM.
    Zoghlami K; Gómez-Gras D
    Microsc Res Tech; 2004 Dec; 65(6):270-5. PubMed ID: 15662619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.