These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10728343)
1. Regrets or no regrets? No regrets! The fate of rejected manuscripts. Opthof T; Furstner F; van Geer M; Coronel R Cardiovasc Res; 2000 Jan; 45(1):255-8. PubMed ID: 10728343 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Peers review, editors decide, and then, what? Schachat AP Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Apr; 143(4):677-8. PubMed ID: 17386274 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The peer review process III: when the decision is made. Riss P Int Urogynecol J; 2012 Jul; 23(7):811-2. PubMed ID: 21901436 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Fate of manuscripts rejected by Intensive Care Medicine from 2013 to 2016: a follow-up analysis. Citerio G; Deutsch E; Sala E; Lavillonnière M; Perner A; Jaber S; Timsit JF; Azoulay E Intensive Care Med; 2018 Dec; 44(12):2300-2301. PubMed ID: 30298204 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The outcome of manuscripts submitted to the American Journal of Ophthalmology between 2002 and 2003. Liesegang TJ; Shaikh M; Crook JE Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Apr; 143(4):551-60. PubMed ID: 17276380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fate of manuscripts rejected from the Red Journal. Holliday EB; Yang G; Jagsi R; Hoffman KE; Bennett KE; Grace C; Zietman AL Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Jan; 91(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 25835616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Outcomes of rejected Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology manuscripts. Silberzweig JE; Khorsandi AS J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1620-3. PubMed ID: 18693043 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. What is submitted and what gets accepted in Indian Pediatrics: analysis of submissions, review process, decision making, and criteria for rejection. Gupta P; Kaur G; Sharma B; Shah D; Choudhury P Indian Pediatr; 2006 Jun; 43(6):479-89. PubMed ID: 16820657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The fate of epidemiologic manuscripts: a study of papers submitted to epidemiology. Hall SA; Wilcox AJ Epidemiology; 2007 Mar; 18(2):262-5. PubMed ID: 17301708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fate of the peer review process at the ESA: long-term outcome of submitted studies over a 5-year period. Raptis DA; Oberkofler CE; Gouma D; Garden OJ; Bismuth H; Lerut T; Clavien PA Ann Surg; 2010 Nov; 252(5):715-25. PubMed ID: 21037426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. What happens to your manuscript: characteristics of papers published in volume 160. Editors Am J Epidemiol; 2004 Dec; 160(12):1234-6. PubMed ID: 15583376 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Measuring research success via bibliometrics: where they fit and how they help and hinder. Thompson DR; Clark AM J Adv Nurs; 2015 Dec; 71(12):2699-701. PubMed ID: 25534133 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Acceptance rates for manuscripts submitted to veterinary peer-reviewed journals in 2012. Lamb CR; Adams CA Equine Vet J; 2015 Nov; 47(6):736-40. PubMed ID: 25302854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Improving the publication rate of Spanish researchers in good journals]. Tyrer P Actas Esp Psiquiatr; 2006; 34(5):283-6. PubMed ID: 16991015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bibliometrics, dermatology and contact dermatitis. Smith DR Contact Dermatitis; 2008 Sep; 59(3):133-6. PubMed ID: 18759892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fate of manuscripts declined by the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. Armstrong AW; Idriss SZ; Kimball AB; Bernhard JD J Am Acad Dermatol; 2008 Apr; 58(4):632-5. PubMed ID: 18249470 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Analysis of the Revision Process by American Journal of Roentgenology Reviewers and Section Editors: Metrics of Rejected Manuscripts and Their Final Disposition. Cejas C AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jun; 208(6):1181-1184. PubMed ID: 28350482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]