These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10730012)

  • 1. Assisted reproductive technology law. Obtaining informed consent for the commercial cryopreservation of embryos.
    Vukadinovich DM
    J Leg Med; 2000 Mar; 21(1):67-78. PubMed ID: 10730012
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Procreative liberty and contemporaneous choice: an inalienable rights approach to frozen embryo disputes.
    Coleman CH
    Minn Law Rev; 1999 Nov; 84(1):55-127. PubMed ID: 16514764
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ethical dilemmas in reproductive medicine.
    Paine SJ; Moore PK; Hill DL
    Whittier Law Rev; 1996; 18(1):51-66. PubMed ID: 16273701
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Parpalaix v. CECOS: Protecting Intent in Reproductive Technology.
    Katz GA
    Harv J Law Technol; 1998; 11(3):683-98. PubMed ID: 12731553
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Seeking a better solution for the disposition of frozen embryos: is embryo adoption the answer?
    Redman PC; Redman LF
    Tulsa Law J; 2000; 35(3-4):583-98. PubMed ID: 16273678
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A primer on posthumous conception and related issues of assisted reproduction.
    Brenwald ML; Redeker K
    Washburn Law J; 1999; 38(2):599-654. PubMed ID: 12774811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ulysses and the fate of frozen embryos--reproduction, research, or destruction?
    Annas GJ
    N Engl J Med; 2000 Aug; 343(5):373-6. PubMed ID: 10922428
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Frozen embryo disposition.
    Forster HP
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1999; 29(2):4-5. PubMed ID: 10321331
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. No use of stored embryos without consent.
    Bull Med Ethics; 2003 Sep; (191):5-6. PubMed ID: 16208789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Examining disputes over ownership rights to frozen embryos: will prior consent documents survive if challenged by state law and/or constitutional principles?
    Sheinbach DM
    Cathol Univers Law Rev; 1999; 48(3):989-1027. PubMed ID: 12611403
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cryopreserved embryos: a response to "forced parenthood" and the role of intent.
    Apel SB
    Fam Law Q; 2005; 39(3):663-81. PubMed ID: 16610152
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. British women lose court fight over possessing frozen embryos.
    N Y Times Web; 2003 Oct; ():A5. PubMed ID: 14526820
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Navigating the slippery slope of frozen embryo disputes: the case for a contractual approach.
    Fleming NA
    Temple Law Rev; 2002; 75(2):345-74. PubMed ID: 15156893
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Disputing over embryos: of contracts and consents.
    Waldman EA
    Ariz State Law J; 2000; 32(3):897-940. PubMed ID: 12769122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genesis retold: legal issues raised by the cryopreservation of preimplantation human embryos.
    Saltarelli JJ
    Syracuse Law Rev; 1985; 36(3):1021-53. PubMed ID: 16086476
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The "embryo" wars: at the epicenter of science, law, religion, and politics.
    Crockin SL
    Fam Law Q; 2005; 39(3):599-632. PubMed ID: 16610149
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Regulating reproductive technologies: panacea or paper tiger?
    Daar JF
    Houst Law Rev; 1997; 34(3):609-64. PubMed ID: 12680374
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Frozen embryo disputes revisited: a trilogy of procreation-avoidance approaches.
    Daar JF
    J Law Med Ethics; 2001; 29(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 11508196
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The legal status of embryos and implications for reproductive technologies and biotechnology research.
    Bowens KK
    J Biolaw Bus; 2006; 9(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 17111524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Consent, frozen embryos, procreative choice and the ideal family.
    Scully-Hill A
    Camb Law J; 2004 Mar; 63(1):47-9. PubMed ID: 16602206
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.