These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Attitudes of final year dental students to the use of rubber dam. Mala S; Lynch CD; Burke FM; Dummer PM Int Endod J; 2009 Jul; 42(7):632-8. PubMed ID: 19467044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A stabilized rubber dam clamp for cervical restorations: a case report. Huband ML Va Dent J; 1994; 71(2):21-2. PubMed ID: 9540740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Rubber dam--the easy way. Small BW Gen Dent; 1999; 47(1):30-3. PubMed ID: 10321148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional cavity preparations for glass-ionomer restorations in primary molars: one-year results. Yip HK; Smales RJ; Yu C; Gao XJ; Deng DM Quintessence Int; 2002 Jan; 33(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 11887531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Extending the use of rubber dam isolation: alternative procedures. Part III. Liebenberg WH Quintessence Int; 1993 Apr; 24(4):237-44. PubMed ID: 8362034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The rubber dam-retaining appliance: an adjunct to isolation during placement of multiple veneers. Liebenberg WH Quintessence Int; 1995 Jul; 26(7):493-500. PubMed ID: 8935035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The treatment of localised hypoplastic and hypomineralised defects in first permanent molars. Mahoney EK N Z Dent J; 2001 Sep; 97(429):101-5. PubMed ID: 11695149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Alternative rubber dam isolation technique for the restoration of Class V cervical lesions. Owens BM Oper Dent; 2006; 31(2):277-80. PubMed ID: 16827034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical evaluation of atraumatic restorations in primary molars: a comparison between 2 glass ionomer cements. Menezes JP; Rosenblatt A; Medeiros E J Dent Child (Chic); 2006; 73(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 16948370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-year clinical performance of a compomer in stress-bearing restorations in permanent posterior teeth. Huth KC; Manhard J; Hickel R; Kunzelmann KH Am J Dent; 2003 Aug; 16(4):255-9. PubMed ID: 14579881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rubber dam isolation in pediatric patients: a review. Karaouzas L; Kim YE; Boynton JR J Mich Dent Assoc; 2012 Jan; 94(1):34-7. PubMed ID: 22439521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluating the efficacy of EMLA topical anesthetic in sealant placement with rubber dam. Lim S; Julliard K Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(6):497-500. PubMed ID: 15646911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A one-year clinical evaluation of a high-viscosity glass ionomer cement in primary molars. Yilmaz Y; Eyuboglu O; Kocogullari ME; Belduz N J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Feb; 7(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 16491149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The use of glass ionomer materials in pediatric dentistry. Gleghorn T Dent Today; 2001 Jun; 20(6):76-9. PubMed ID: 11444140 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional restorative procedures in a hospital clinic: evaluation after 30 months. Gao W; Peng D; Smales RJ; Yip KH Quintessence Int; 2003 Jan; 34(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 12674356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical evaluation of glass-ionomer tunnel restorations in primary molars: 36 months results. Markovic D; Peric T Aust Dent J; 2008 Mar; 53(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 18304240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Tooth-shade shift after rubber-dam isolation. Passon C; Lambert R Gen Dent; 1994; 42(2):148-52; quiz 153-4. PubMed ID: 8056275 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]