These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10730482)

  • 1. [Compliance, conscious participation, and informed consent in tumor screening programs].
    Segnan N; Armaroli P
    Epidemiol Prev; 1999; 23(4):387-91. PubMed ID: 10730482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The origin of informed consent].
    Mallardi V
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2005 Oct; 25(5):312-27. PubMed ID: 16602332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Informed decision making: what is its role in cancer screening?
    Rimer BK; Briss PA; Zeller PK; Chan EC; Woolf SH
    Cancer; 2004 Sep; 101(5 Suppl):1214-28. PubMed ID: 15316908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Personal invitations for population-based breast cancer screening.
    Saalasti-Koskinen U; Mäkelä M; Saarenmaa I; Autti-Rämö I
    Acad Radiol; 2009 May; 16(5):546-50. PubMed ID: 19345895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Informed consent for facial transplantation.
    Renshaw A; Clarke A; Diver AJ; Ashcroft RE; Butler PE
    Transpl Int; 2006 Nov; 19(11):861-7. PubMed ID: 17018120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Print information to inform decisions about mammography screening participation in 16 countries with population-based programs.
    Zapka JG; Geller BM; Bulliard JL; Fracheboud J; Sancho-Garnier H; Ballard-Barbash R;
    Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Oct; 63(1-2):126-37. PubMed ID: 16962910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pattern of participation in a cohort aged 50-60 years at first invitation to the service-screening programme with mammography in Stockholm county, Sweden.
    Törnberg S; Kemetli L; Svane G; Rosén M; Stenbeck M; Nyström L
    Prev Med; 2005; 41(3-4):728-33. PubMed ID: 16137757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Addiction and brief-systemic therapy: working with compulsion].
    Cottencin O; Doutrelugne Y; Goudemand M; Consoli SM
    Encephale; 2009 Jun; 35(3):214-9. PubMed ID: 19540406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of informed consent: a pilot study.
    Länsimies-Antikainen H; Pietilä AM; Laitinen T; Schwab U; Rauramaa R; Länsimies E
    J Adv Nurs; 2007 Jul; 59(2):146-54. PubMed ID: 17543012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How should we measure informed choice? The case of cancer screening.
    Jepson RG; Hewison J; Thompson AG; Weller D
    J Med Ethics; 2005 Apr; 31(4):192-6. PubMed ID: 15800356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Waiving informed consent in newborn screening research: balancing social value and respect.
    Tarini BA; Burke W; Scott CR; Wilfond BS
    Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet; 2008 Feb; 148C(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 18200521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improving informed consent: insights from behavioral decision research.
    Holmes-Rovner M; Wills CE
    Med Care; 2002 Sep; 40(9 Suppl):V30-8. PubMed ID: 12226583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Informed consent: a pragmatic view].
    Kakuk P
    Orv Hetil; 2004 Jul; 145(29):1517-22. PubMed ID: 15453023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reasons for participation in pain research: can they indicate a lack of informed consent?
    Wasan AD; Taubenberger SP; Robinson WM
    Pain Med; 2009 Jan; 10(1):111-9. PubMed ID: 18657219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How important is consent in maternal serum screening for Down syndrome in France? Information and consent evaluation in maternal serum screening for Down syndrome: a French study.
    Favre R; Duchange N; Vayssière C; Kohler M; Bouffard N; Hunsinger MC; Kohler A; Mager C; Neumann M; Vayssière C; Viville B; Hervé C; Moutel G
    Prenat Diagn; 2007 Mar; 27(3):197-205. PubMed ID: 17238219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Informed consent: not just for procedures anymore.
    Feld AD
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Jun; 99(6):977-80. PubMed ID: 15180712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cancer screening - pros, cons, choice, and the patient.
    Trevena L
    Aust Fam Physician; 2009 Apr; 38(4):188-92. PubMed ID: 19350066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Informed consent: providing information about prenatal examinations.
    Dahl K; Kesmodel U; Hvidman L; Olesen F
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(12):1420-5. PubMed ID: 17260215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Views of US researchers about informed consent in international collaborative research.
    Dawson L; Kass NE
    Soc Sci Med; 2005 Sep; 61(6):1211-22. PubMed ID: 15970232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perceptions of informed consent by participants in a prostate cancer prevention study.
    Gotay CC
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2001 Oct; 10(10):1097-9. PubMed ID: 11588137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.