These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10730482)

  • 21. Which socio-demographic factors are associated with participation in oral cancer screening in the developing world? Results from a population-based screening project in India.
    Ramadas K; Arrossi S; Thara S; Thomas G; Jissa V; Fayette JM; Mathew B; Sankaranarayanan R
    Cancer Detect Prev; 2008; 32(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 18632218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An approach to enhance communication about screening mammography in primary care.
    Nekhlyudov L; Braddock CH
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2009 Sep; 18(9):1403-12. PubMed ID: 19708801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Quality assurance questionnaire for professionals fails to improve the quality of informed consent.
    Lavori PW; Wilt TJ; Sugarman J
    Clin Trials; 2007; 4(6):638-49. PubMed ID: 18042573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Patient autonomy and informed consent in clinical practice].
    Pedersen R; Hofmann B; Mangset M
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2007 Jun; 127(12):1644-7. PubMed ID: 17571103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Validity of process indicators of screening for breast cancer to predict mortality reduction.
    Sarkeala T; Anttila A; Saarenmaa I; Hakama M
    J Med Screen; 2005; 12(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 15814017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Ethical, legal, and social concerns about expanded newborn screening: fragile X syndrome as a prototype for emerging issues.
    Bailey DB; Skinner D; Davis AM; Whitmarsh I; Powell C
    Pediatrics; 2008 Mar; 121(3):e693-704. PubMed ID: 18310190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Patient-centered informed consent in surgical practice.
    Bernat JL; Peterson LM
    Arch Surg; 2006 Jan; 141(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 16415417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. How do women who choose not to participate in population-based cervical cancer screening reason about their decision?
    Blomberg K; Ternestedt BM; Törnberg S; Tishelman C
    Psychooncology; 2008 Jun; 17(6):561-9. PubMed ID: 17886262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology
    J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2397-406. PubMed ID: 12692171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Research conditions that qualify for emergency exception from informed consent.
    Watters D; Sayre MR; Silbergleit R
    Acad Emerg Med; 2005 Nov; 12(11):1040-4. PubMed ID: 16264071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Proposing modesty for informed consent.
    Burgess MM
    Soc Sci Med; 2007 Dec; 65(11):2284-95. PubMed ID: 17884264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Understanding the decisions of cancer clinical trial participants to enter research studies: factors associated with informed consent, patient satisfaction, and decisional regret.
    Stryker JE; Wray RJ; Emmons KM; Winer E; Demetri G
    Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Oct; 63(1-2):104-9. PubMed ID: 16242898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The importance of maintaining patient's continued and informed consent.
    Kaminski R
    J Calif Alliance Ment Ill; 1994; 5(1):57-8. PubMed ID: 11653326
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Beyond informed consent.
    Bhutta ZA
    Bull World Health Organ; 2004 Oct; 82(10):771-7. PubMed ID: 15643799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Informed decision-making and colorectal cancer screening: is it occurring in primary care?
    Ling BS; Trauth JM; Fine MJ; Mor MK; Resnick A; Braddock CH; Bereknyei S; Weissfeld JL; Schoen RE; Ricci EM; Whittle J
    Med Care; 2008 Sep; 46(9 Suppl 1):S23-9. PubMed ID: 18725829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Participation behaviour following a false positive test in the Copenhagen mammography screening programme.
    Andersen SB; Vejborg I; von Euler-Chelpin M
    Acta Oncol; 2008; 47(4):550-5. PubMed ID: 18465321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. How to handle informed consent in longitudinal studies when participants have a limited understanding of the study.
    Helgesson G; Ludvigsson J; Gustafsson Stolt U
    J Med Ethics; 2005 Nov; 31(11):670-3. PubMed ID: 16269567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Informed consent, psychological stress and noncompliance.
    Alexander M
    Humane Med; 1990; 6(2):113-9. PubMed ID: 11650982
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Screening for cervical carcinoma.
    van Leeuwen AW; de Nooijer P; Hop WC
    Cancer; 2005 Oct; 105(5):270-6. PubMed ID: 15937918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Dynamic informed consent processes vital for treatment with antidepressants.
    Gopal AA; Cosgrove L; Shuv-Ami I; Wheeler EE; Yerganian MJ; Bursztajn HJ
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2012; 35(5-6):392-7. PubMed ID: 23036363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.