144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10730799)
1. An analysis of printed breast cancer information for African American women.
Mohrmann CC; Coleman EA; Coon SK; Lord JE; Heard JK; Cantrell MJ; Burks EC
J Cancer Educ; 2000; 15(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 10730799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessing cultural sensitivity in printed cancer materials.
Guidry JJ; Walker VD
Cancer Pract; 1999; 7(6):291-6. PubMed ID: 10732526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cultural sensitivity and readability of breast and prostate printed cancer education materials targeting African Americans.
Guidry JJ; Fagan P; Walker V
J Natl Med Assoc; 1998 Mar; 90(3):165-9. PubMed ID: 9549980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prostate Cancer Information Available in Health-Care Provider Offices: An Analysis of Content, Readability, and Cultural Sensitivity.
Choi SK; Seel JS; Yelton B; Steck SE; McCormick DP; Payne J; Minter A; Deutchki EK; Hébert JR; Friedman DB
Am J Mens Health; 2018 Jul; 12(4):1160-1167. PubMed ID: 29649921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Computerized versus hand-scored health literacy tools: a comparison of Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) and Flesch-Kincaid in printed patient education materials.
Grabeel KL; Russomanno J; Oelschlegel S; Tester E; Heidel RE
J Med Libr Assoc; 2018 Jan; 106(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 29339932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Readability of printed sources of diet and health information.
Dollahite J; Thompson C; McNew R
Patient Educ Couns; 1996 Mar; 27(2):123-34. PubMed ID: 8788342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Developing and testing lay literature about breast cancer screening for African American women.
Coleman EA; Coon S; Mohrmann C; Hardin S; Stewart B; Gibson RS; Cantrell M; Lord J; Heard J
Clin J Oncol Nurs; 2003; 7(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 12629937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Suitability of prostate cancer education materials: applying a standardized assessment tool to currently available materials.
Weintraub D; Maliski SL; Fink A; Choe S; Litwin MS
Patient Educ Couns; 2004 Nov; 55(2):275-80. PubMed ID: 15530765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Perceptions about breast cancer among African American women: do selected educational materials challenge them?
Powe BD; Daniels EC; Finnie R; Thompson A
Patient Educ Couns; 2005 Feb; 56(2):197-204. PubMed ID: 15653249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Suitability and readability assessment of printed educational materials on hypertension].
Lee TW; Kang SJ; Kim HH; Woo SR; Kim S
J Korean Acad Nurs; 2011 Jun; 41(3):333-43. PubMed ID: 21804342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cultural sensitivity and health promotion: assessing breast cancer education pamphlets designed for African American women.
Kline KN
Health Commun; 2007; 21(1):85-96. PubMed ID: 17461755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Readability of patient information pamphlets in urogynecology.
Reagan KM; O'Sullivan DM; Harvey DP; Lasala CA
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2015; 21(2):63-5. PubMed ID: 25679357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Getting ready: developing an educational intervention to prepare African American women for breast biopsy.
Bradley PK; Berry A; Lang C; Myers RE
ABNF J; 2006; 17(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 16596896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessing Readability: Are Urogynecologic Patient Education Materials at an Appropriate Reading Level?
Haller J; Keller Z; Barr S; Hadden K; Oliphant SS
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2019; 25(2):139-144. PubMed ID: 30807416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The readability levels of cancer-prevention materials targeting African Americans.
Guidry JJ; Fagan P
J Cancer Educ; 1997; 12(2):108-13. PubMed ID: 9229274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The quality, understandability, readability, and popularity of online educational materials for heart murmur.
Arslan D; Sami Tutar M; Kozanhan B; Bagci Z
Cardiol Young; 2020 Mar; 30(3):328-336. PubMed ID: 31875800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Readability of Written Materials for CKD Patients: A Systematic Review.
Morony S; Flynn M; McCaffery KJ; Jansen J; Webster AC
Am J Kidney Dis; 2015 Jun; 65(6):842-50. PubMed ID: 25661679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comprehensive assessment of the difficulty level and cultural sensitivity of online cancer prevention resources for older minority men.
Friedman DB; Kao EK
Prev Chronic Dis; 2008 Jan; 5(1):A07. PubMed ID: 18081996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Readability of Online Neuro-Oncology-Related Patient Education Materials from Tertiary-Care Academic Centers.
Ammanuel SG; Edwards CS; Alhadi R; Hervey-Jumper SL
World Neurosurg; 2020 Feb; 134():e1108-e1114. PubMed ID: 31785430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Readability: an important issue impacting healthcare for women with postpartum depression.
Logsdon MC; Hutti MH
MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 2006; 31(6):350-5. PubMed ID: 17149109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
