These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10730957)

  • 1. Determination of absorbed dose to water in reference conditions for radiotherapy kilovoltage x-rays between 10 and 300 kV: a comparison of the data in the IAEA, IPEMB, DIN and NCS dosimetry protocols.
    Peixoto JG; Andreo P
    Phys Med Biol; 2000 Mar; 45(3):563-75. PubMed ID: 10730957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Kilovoltage x-ray dosimetry--an experimental comparison between different dosimetry protocols.
    Munck af Rosenschöld P; Nilsson P; Knöös T
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Aug; 53(16):4431-42. PubMed ID: 18670053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The IPEMB code of practice for the determination of absorbed dose for x-rays below 300 kV generating potential (0.035 mm Al-4 mm Cu HVL; 10-300 kV generating potential). Institution of Physics and Engineering in Medicine and Biology.
    Phys Med Biol; 1996 Dec; 41(12):2605-25. PubMed ID: 8971972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of high-energy photon and electron dosimetry for various dosimetry protocols.
    Araki F; Kubo HD
    Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):857-68. PubMed ID: 12033582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison between absorbed dose to water standards established by water calorimetry at the LNE-LNHB and by application of international air-kerma based protocols for kilovoltage medium energy x-rays.
    Perichon N; Rapp B; Denoziere M; Daures J; Ostrowsky A; Bordy JM
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 May; 58(9):2787-806. PubMed ID: 23563051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Protocols for the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams: a comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and previous international codes of practice. International Atomic Energy Agency.
    Andreo P; Huq MS; Westermark M; Song H; Tilikidis A; DeWerd L; Shortt K
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 Sep; 47(17):3033-53. PubMed ID: 12361209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and AAPM TG-51 absorbed dose to water protocols in the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams.
    Huq MS; Andreo P; Song H
    Phys Med Biol; 2001 Nov; 46(11):2985-3006. PubMed ID: 11720359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A dosimetric evaluation of the IAEA-AAPM TRS483 code of practice for dosimetry of small static fields used in conventional linac beams and comparison with IAEA TRS-398, AAPM TG51, and TG51 Addendum protocols.
    Huq MS; Hwang MS; Teo TP; Jang SY; Heron DE; Lalonde RJ
    Med Phys; 2018 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 30009526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Dosimetry Protocols for Electron Beam Radiotherapy Calibrations and Measurement Uncertainties.
    Elbashir FEM; Ksouri W; Eisa MH; Alanazi S; Habbani F; Sulieman A; Bradley DA; Suliman II
    Life (Basel); 2021 Dec; 12(1):. PubMed ID: 35054424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Addendum to the IPEMB code of practice for the determination of absorbed dose for x-rays below 300 kV generating potential (0.035 mm Al-4 mm Cu HVL).
    Aukett RJ; Burns JE; Greener AG; Harrison RM; Moretti C; Nahum AE; Rosser KE;
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jun; 50(12):2739-48. PubMed ID: 15930599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Absorbed dose to water based dosimetry versus air kerma based dosimetry for high-energy photon beams: an experimental study.
    Palmans H; Nafaa L; De JJ; Gillis S; Hoornaert MT; Martens C; Piessens M; Thierens H; Van der Plaetsen A; Vynckier S
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 Feb; 47(3):421-40. PubMed ID: 11848121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Issues encountered with kilovoltage x-ray reference dosimetry when changing codes of practice from TRS 277 to TRS 398.
    Jhala E; Steer B; Laban J; Greig L
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2009 Mar; 32(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 19400547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Determination of absorbed dose to water for high-energy photon and electron beams-comparison of the standards DIN 6800-2 (1997), IAEA TRS 398 (2000) and DIN 6800-2 (2006).
    Zakaria GA; Schuette W
    J Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 32(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 21217912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A dosimetry study comparing NCS report-5, IAEA TRS-381, AAPM TG-51 and IAEA TRS-398 in three clinical electron beam energies.
    Palmans H; Nafaa L; de Patoul N; Denis JM; Tomsej M; Vynckier S
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 May; 48(9):1091-107. PubMed ID: 12765324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reference Dosimetry according to the New German Protocol DIN 6800-2 and Comparison with IAEA TRS 398 and AAPM TG 51.
    Zakaria A; Schuette W; Younan C
    Biomed Imaging Interv J; 2011 Apr; 7(2):e15. PubMed ID: 22287987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An investigation of entrance surface dose calculations for diagnostic radiology using Monte Carlo simulations and radiotherapy dosimetry formalisms.
    Omrane LB; Verhaegen F; Chahed N; Mtimet S
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 Jun; 48(12):1809-24. PubMed ID: 12870585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Monte Carlo modelling of radiotherapy kV x-ray units.
    Verhaegen F; Nahum AE; Van de Putte S; Namito Y
    Phys Med Biol; 1999 Jul; 44(7):1767-89. PubMed ID: 10442712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison and uncertainty evaluation of different calibration protocols and ionization chambers for low-energy surface brachytherapy dosimetry.
    Candela-Juan C; Vijande J; García-Martínez T; Niatsetski Y; Nauta G; Schuurman J; Ouhib Z; Ballester F; Perez-Calatayud J
    Med Phys; 2015 Aug; 42(8):4954-64. PubMed ID: 26233221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dosimetry study comparing NCS report-2 versus IAEA report TRS-398 for high energy photon beams.
    Attalla EM; Khaled NE; Abou-Elenein HS; Elsayed AA
    Gulf J Oncolog; 2008 Jan; (3):25-31. PubMed ID: 20084794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Absorbed dose measurement of photon beam with Farmer-type ionization chambers in Japanese dosimetry protocols].
    Fujisaki T; Hiraoka T; Osawa A; Nakajima M; Kuwabara A; Yokoyama K; Saitoh H; Tomaru T; Inada T
    Igaku Butsuri; 2004; 24(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 15226645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.