These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10732256)

  • 1. Family group decision making: protecting children and women.
    Pennell J; Burford G
    Child Welfare; 2000; 79(2):131-58. PubMed ID: 10732256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Safety conferencing: toward a coordinated and inclusive response to safeguard women and children.
    Pennell J; Francis S
    Violence Against Women; 2005 May; 11(5):666-92. PubMed ID: 16043566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does family group decision making affect child welfare outcomes? Findings from a randomized control study.
    Berzin SC; Cohen E; Thomas K; Dawson WC
    Child Welfare; 2008; 87(4):35-54. PubMed ID: 19391466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing the safety of children at risk of maltreatment: decision-making models.
    DePanfilis D; Scannapieco M
    Child Welfare; 1994; 73(3):229-45. PubMed ID: 8005017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Family assessment in child welfare services: instrument comparisons.
    Johnson M; Stone S; Lou C; Vu CM; Ling J; Mizrahi P; Austin MJ
    J Evid Based Soc Work; 2008; 5(1-2):57-90. PubMed ID: 19064445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The impact of prevention Programs on decisions in child protective services.
    Maguire-Jack K; Byers K
    Child Welfare; 2013; 92(5):59-86. PubMed ID: 24923135
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Engaging parents in child welfare services: bridging family needs and child welfare mandates.
    Kemp SP; Marcenko MO; Hoagwood K; Vesneski W
    Child Welfare; 2009; 88(1):101-26. PubMed ID: 19653455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Kinship care of the abused child: the New Zealand experience.
    Worrall J
    Child Welfare; 2001; 80(5):497-511. PubMed ID: 11678409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Outcomes of family group conferencing in Sweden. A 3-year follow-up.
    Sundell K; Vinnerljung B
    Child Abuse Negl; 2004 Mar; 28(3):267-87. PubMed ID: 15066346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.
    Schor EL;
    Pediatrics; 2003 Jun; 111(6 Pt 2):1541-71. PubMed ID: 12777595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Decision-making in child protective services: a comparison of selected risk-assessment systems.
    Doueck HJ; English DJ; DePanfilis D; Moote GT
    Child Welfare; 1993; 72(5):441-52. PubMed ID: 8404248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improving detection and quality of assessment of child abuse and partner abuse is achievable with a formal organisational change approach.
    Wills R; Ritchie M; Wilson M
    J Paediatr Child Health; 2008 Mar; 44(3):92-8. PubMed ID: 18307418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinicians' description of factors influencing their reporting of suspected child abuse: report of the Child Abuse Reporting Experience Study Research Group.
    Jones R; Flaherty EG; Binns HJ; Price LL; Slora E; Abney D; Harris DL; Christoffel KK; Sege RD;
    Pediatrics; 2008 Aug; 122(2):259-66. PubMed ID: 18676541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Employers force family abuse out of the closet.
    Droste T
    Hospitals; 1988 Oct; 62(19):54-5. PubMed ID: 3417265
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparing differential responses within child protective services: a longitudinal examination.
    Marshall SK; Charles G; Kendrick K; Pakalniskiene V
    Child Welfare; 2010; 89(3):57-77. PubMed ID: 20945805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A strengths approach to ethnically sensitive practice for child protective service workers.
    Leung P; Cheung KF; Stevenson KM
    Child Welfare; 1994; 73(6):707-21. PubMed ID: 7988278
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Developmental needs and individualized family service plans among infants and toddlers in the child welfare system.
    Casanueva CE; Cross TP; Ringeisen H
    Child Maltreat; 2008 Aug; 13(3):245-58. PubMed ID: 18495948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Child contact centers and domestic abuse: victim safety and the challenge to neutrality.
    Morrison F; Wasoff F
    Violence Against Women; 2012 Jun; 18(6):711-20. PubMed ID: 22855127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Child welfare services and delinquency: the need to know more.
    Jonson-Reid M
    Child Welfare; 2004; 83(2):157-73. PubMed ID: 15068217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Daily living with distress and enrichment: the moral experience of families with ventilator-assisted children at home.
    Carnevale FA; Alexander E; Davis M; Rennick J; Troini R
    Pediatrics; 2006 Jan; 117(1):e48-60. PubMed ID: 16396848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.