327 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10732878)
1. Genetic ignorance, moral obligations and social duties.
Takala T; Häyry M
J Med Philos; 2000 Feb; 25(1):107-13; discussion 114-20. PubMed ID: 10732878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The right to genetic ignorance confirmed.
Takala T
Bioethics; 1999 Jul; 13(3-4):288-93. PubMed ID: 11657239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Genetic links, family ties, and social bonds: rights and responsibilities in the face of genetic knowledge.
Rhodes R
J Med Philos; 1998 Feb; 23(1):10-30. PubMed ID: 9555632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Rethinking medical confidentiality: the impact of genetics.
Wachbroit R
Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1993; 27(4):1391-410. PubMed ID: 11657043
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Privacy and disclosure in medical genetics examined in an ethics of care.
Wertz DC; Fletcher JC
Bioethics; 1991 Jul; 5(3):212-32. PubMed ID: 11659340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Genetic privacy: orthodoxy or oxymoron?
Sommerville A; English V
J Med Ethics; 1999 Apr; 25(2):144-50. PubMed ID: 10226920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ethical considerations in the social context of Huntington disease.
Turner D
Dis Markers; 1992; 10(4):171-83; discussion 211-28. PubMed ID: 1304435
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Kant's assessment of motivation in the fulfillment of social obligations.
Knupp J
Penn Bioeth J; 2006; 2(2):29-32. PubMed ID: 17146908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ethics, law, and medical genetics: after the human genome is mapped.
Fletcher JC; Wertz DC
Emory Law J; 1990; 39(3):747-809. PubMed ID: 11653908
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The appearance of Kant's deontology in contemporary Kantianism: concepts of patient autonomy in bioethics.
Secker B
J Med Philos; 1999 Feb; 24(1):43-66. PubMed ID: 10223442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The genetic revolution and the physician's duty of confidentiality. The role of the old Hippocratic virtues in the regulation of the new genetic intimacy.
Berry RM
J Leg Med; 1997 Dec; 18(4):401-41. PubMed ID: 9433035
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Geographies of responsibility.
Walker M
Hastings Cent Rep; 1997; 27(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 9017414
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [The origin of informed consent].
Mallardi V
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2005 Oct; 25(5):312-27. PubMed ID: 16602332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Patients' duties.
Meyer MJ
J Med Philos; 1992 Oct; 17(5):541-55. PubMed ID: 1431668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Autonomy, respect, and genetic information policy: a reply to Tuija Takala and Matti Häyry.
Rhodes R
J Med Philos; 2000 Feb; 25(1):114-20. PubMed ID: 11645210
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Comment on a view favoring ignorance of genetic information: confidentiality, autonomy, beneficence and the right not to know.
Bottis MC
Eur J Health Law; 2000 Jun; 7(2):173-83. PubMed ID: 11789513
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Making responsible decisions. An interpretive ethic for genetic decisionmaking.
White MT
Hastings Cent Rep; 1999; 29(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 10052006
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Autonomy, justice, and disability.
Ball CA
UCLA Law Rev; 2000 Feb; 47(3):599-651. PubMed ID: 16273682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Freedom and a right (not) to know.
Räikkä J
Bioethics; 1998 Jan; 12(1):49-63. PubMed ID: 11655309
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Dependence and a Kantian conception of dignity as a value.
Byers P
Theor Med Bioeth; 2016 Feb; 37(1):61-9. PubMed ID: 26906557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
