140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10734638)
21. [JPS 5th ed. Classification of pancreatic cancer and JPS classification versus UICC classification].
Kawarada Y
Nihon Rinsho; 2006 Jan; 64 Suppl 1():81-6. PubMed ID: 16457225
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. [Proposals for revisions of UICC TNM system (1997)--breast cancer].
Yamamoto H; Morimoto T; Sano M; Fukuda M; Ueno E; Tajima T; Iwase T
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1998 Jun; 25(7):1087-93. PubMed ID: 9644326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Staging of exocrine pancreatic carcinoma.
Hermanek P
Eur J Surg Oncol; 1991 Apr; 17(2):167-72. PubMed ID: 2015921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Lymph node metastasis of gastric cancer: comparison of Union International Contra Cancer and Japanese systems.
Ikeguchi M; Murakami D; Kanaji S; Ohro S; Maeta Y; Yamaguchi K; Tatebe S; Kondo A; Tsujitani S; Kaibara N
ANZ J Surg; 2004 Oct; 74(10):852-4. PubMed ID: 15456431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Reappraisal of the new UICC staging system for gastric cancer: problem in lymph node stage.
Lee WJ; Hong RL; Lai IR; Chen CN; Lee PH; Chung KC
Hepatogastroenterology; 2002; 49(45):860-4. PubMed ID: 12064008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Prognostic staging system for hepatocellular carcinoma (CLIP score): its value and limitations, and a proposal for a new staging system, the Japan Integrated Staging Score (JIS score).
Kudo M; Chung H; Osaki Y
J Gastroenterol; 2003; 38(3):207-15. PubMed ID: 12673442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Pancreatic cancer].
Tsuchiya R
Gan No Rinsho; 1986 Aug; 32(10):1362-4. PubMed ID: 3783968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Log odds of positive lymph nodes: a novel prognostic indicator superior to the number-based and the ratio-based N category for gastric cancer patients with R0 resection.
Sun Z; Xu Y; Li de M; Wang ZN; Zhu GL; Huang BJ; Li K; Xu HM
Cancer; 2010 Jun; 116(11):2571-80. PubMed ID: 20336791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Which classification for ethmoid malignant tumors involving the anterior skull base?
Cantù G; Solero CL; Miceli R; Mariani L; Mattavelli F; Squadrelli-Saraceno M; Bimbi G; Riccio S; Colombo S; Locati L; Olmi P; Licitra L
Head Neck; 2005 Mar; 27(3):224-31. PubMed ID: 15627260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A comparison of different staging systems predictability of patient outcome. Thyroid carcinoma as an example.
Brierley JD; Panzarella T; Tsang RW; Gospodarowicz MK; O'Sullivan B
Cancer; 1997 Jun; 79(12):2414-23. PubMed ID: 9191532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Limited prognostic value of the 2004 International Union Against Cancer staging classification for adrenocortical carcinoma: proposal for a Revised TNM Classification.
Fassnacht M; Johanssen S; Quinkler M; Bucsky P; Willenberg HS; Beuschlein F; Terzolo M; Mueller HH; Hahner S; Allolio B; ;
Cancer; 2009 Jan; 115(2):243-50. PubMed ID: 19025987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. International documentation system for pancreatic cancer (IDS). The future in pancreatic cancer evaluation.
Birk D; Beger HG; Fortnagel G; Hermanek P
Digestion; 1997; 58(6):578-9. PubMed ID: 9438605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Surgical treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: similar long-term results despite geographic variations.
Pawlik TM; Esnaola NF; Vauthey JN
Liver Transpl; 2004 Feb; 10(2 Suppl 1):S74-80. PubMed ID: 14762844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Prognostic evaluation of the new American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer staging system for hepatocellular carcinoma: analysis of 112 cirrhotic patients resected for hepatocellular carcinoma.
Ramacciato G; Mercantini P; Cautero N; Corigliano N; Di Benedetto F; Quintini C; Ercolani G; Varotti G; Ziparo V; Pinna AD
Ann Surg Oncol; 2005 Apr; 12(4):289-97. PubMed ID: 15827681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Preoperative serum CA19-9 and dissected peripancreatic tissue margin as determiners of long-term survival in pancreatic cancer.
Waraya M; Yamashita K; Katagiri H; Ishii K; Takahashi Y; Furuta K; Watanabe M
Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 May; 16(5):1231-40. PubMed ID: 19263172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Studies on TNM classification of carcinoma of the exocrine pancreas].
Yamamoto M; Ohashi O; Saitoh Y
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1998 Jan; 25(1):143-9. PubMed ID: 9464343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Prognostic value of the 2002 TNM classification for breast carcinoma with regard to the number of metastatic axillary lymph nodes.
Duraker N; Caynak ZC
Cancer; 2005 Aug; 104(4):700-7. PubMed ID: 16003773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The Chinese classification system compared with TNM staging in prognosis of patients with primary hepatic carcinoma after resection.
Sheng JM; Zhao WH; Wu FS; Ma ZM; Feng YZ; Zhou XR; Teng LS
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int; 2005 Nov; 4(4):561-4. PubMed ID: 16286262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Evaluation of the new international TNM staging system for carcinoma of the esophagus as compared with the Chinese trial clinicopathological staging system--an analysis of 224 cases].
Cheng GY
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 1993 Sep; 15(5):358-61. PubMed ID: 8174481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Clinical staging of oropharyngeal carcinoma: a critical evaluation of a new stage grouping proposal.
Ambrosch P; Kron M; Freudenberg LS
Cancer; 1998 May; 82(9):1613-20. PubMed ID: 9576278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
