These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. [Restoration of severely damaged teeth: retention by means of parapulpal pins]. Wirz J Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1988 Aug; 43(8):829-38. PubMed ID: 3255580 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Retention of complex amalgam restorations using self-threading pins, amalgapins, and Amalgambond. Imbery TA; Hilton TJ; Reagan SE Am J Dent; 1995 Jun; 8(3):117-21. PubMed ID: 8599585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Pins as a retention system in silver amalgam fillings]. Garcia Barbero E; Lopez Calvo JA; Otero Calatayud C Rev Eur Odontoestomatol; 1990; 2(4):245-54. PubMed ID: 2222674 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Slot retention: an alternative to pins in the large amalgam restoration. Newsome PR Dent Update; 1988 Jun; 15(5):202, 204-7. PubMed ID: 3267596 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Penetration of shearing and nonshearing pins into dentin. Currens WE; Korostoff E; von Fraunhofer JA J Prosthet Dent; 1980 Oct; 44(4):430-3. PubMed ID: 6931901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Retention and depth of insertion of two self-shearing pins. Van Nieuwenhuysen JP; Vreven J J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Oct; 54(4):496-500. PubMed ID: 3862807 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Maillefer and TMS pins compared for retention and penetration. Van Nieuwenhuysen JP; Vreven J Oper Dent; 1985; 10(4):150-5. PubMed ID: 3913902 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. The number and location of threaded pins for optimal resistance and retention in premolar amalgam restorations. Harrington WG; Moon PC; Crockett WD Va Dent J; 1982 Oct; 59(5):24-31. PubMed ID: 6964007 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. [Improving the anchorage of fillings by parapulpal pins]. Mauks G; Alberth M Fogorv Sz; 1985 Sep; 78(9):265-7. PubMed ID: 3902516 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. [The retentive properties of dental pins]. Asikainen M; Nevaste M Proc Finn Dent Soc; 1972; 68(5):259-62. PubMed ID: 4565870 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Pins, dowels, and other retentive devices in posterior teeth. Jacobi R; Shillingburg HT Dent Clin North Am; 1993 Jul; 37(3):367-90. PubMed ID: 8348992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. ["Pins". Comparative study of their retention]. Dentoscope; 1970; 10():12-5. PubMed ID: 5268423 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. [Retention of parapulpal pins in amalgam fillings]. Derand T Tid Tann; 1974 Feb; 35(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 4525372 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. [Dental pins and their retention]. Van Nieuwenhuysen JP Actual Odontostomatol (Paris); 1984 Jun; (146):265-81. PubMed ID: 6382949 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Retention of Class 3 composite restorations: retention grooves versus enamel bonding. Summitt JB; Chan DC; Dutton FB Oper Dent; 1993; 18(3):88-93. PubMed ID: 8415168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Mechanical versus chemical retention for restoring complex restorations: what is the evidence? Vaught RL J Dent Educ; 2007 Oct; 71(10):1356-62. PubMed ID: 17923714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Large unit restorations. Clinical study]. van Nieuwenhuysen JP Actual Odontostomatol (Paris); 1989 Jun; 42(166):295-316. PubMed ID: 2635557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [The extensive amalgam restoration and retention possibilities]. Plasmans PJ; Vermeulen AH; de Jonge BA Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1985 Nov; 92(11):439-43. PubMed ID: 3868739 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]