These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10735976)

  • 1. Cardiac output measured by electric bioimpedance compared with the CO2 rebreathing technique at different exercise levels.
    Christensen TB; Jensen BV; Hjerpe J; Kanstrup IL
    Clin Physiol; 2000 Mar; 20(2):101-5. PubMed ID: 10735976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Automated non-invasive measurement of cardiac output: comparison of electrical bioimpedance and carbon dioxide rebreathing techniques.
    Smith SA; Russell AE; West MJ; Chalmers J
    Br Heart J; 1988 Mar; 59(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 3128316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Non-invasive assessment of cardiac output during exercise in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: comparison of the CO2-rebreathing method and electrical impedance cardiography.
    Bogaard HJ; Hamersma WB; Horsch JL; Woltjer HH; Postmus PE; de Vries PM
    Physiol Meas; 1997 Nov; 18(4):327-38. PubMed ID: 9413866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of impedance cardiography with indirect Fick (CO2) method of measuring cardiac output in healthy children during exercise.
    Pianosi P; Garros D
    Am J Cardiol; 1996 Apr; 77(9):745-9. PubMed ID: 8651127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impedance cardiography for the assessment of cardiac function during exercise.
    Fujinami T; Nakano S; Nakayama K; Takada K
    Jpn Circ J; 1979 Mar; 43(3):215-23. PubMed ID: 376897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of cardiac output during exercise. Transthoracic impedance vs. heart rate alone.
    Horstmann E; Könn B
    Med Prog Technol; 1993-1994; 19(4):173-8. PubMed ID: 8052172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of cardiac output determined by bioimpedance and bioreactance methods at rest and during exercise.
    Jakovljevic DG; Moore S; Hallsworth K; Fattakhova G; Thoma C; Trenell MI
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2012 Apr; 26(2):63-8. PubMed ID: 22234400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Measurement of cardiac output by CO2 rebreathing technique. A study of reproducibility in the normal subject; application to cardiac insufficiency].
    Douard H; Blaquière C; Oysel N; Rougier P; Broustet JP
    Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1993 Mar; 86(3):341-7. PubMed ID: 8215769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of cardiac output by thoracic electrical bioimpedance during exercise in normal subjects.
    Moore R; Sansores R; Guimond V; Abboud R
    Chest; 1992 Aug; 102(2):448-55. PubMed ID: 1643931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Noninvasive monitoring of cardiac output during exercise by inductance cardiography.
    Kaplan V; Bucklar GB; Bloch KE
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2003 May; 35(5):747-52. PubMed ID: 12750583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of thoracic bioimpedance with acetylene uptake for measuring cardiac output.
    Wang E; Cruz C; Pettersen MR; Hoff J; Helgerud J
    Int J Sports Med; 2014 Oct; 35(11):925-32. PubMed ID: 24886928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Non-invasive assessment of cardiac output and stroke volume in patients during exercise. Evaluation of a CO2-rebreathing method.
    Ohlsson J; Wranne B
    Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol; 1986; 55(5):538-44. PubMed ID: 3095112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Non-invasive cardiac output assessment during moderate exercise: pulse contour compared with CO2 rebreathing.
    Houtman S; Oeseburg B; Hopman MT
    Clin Physiol; 1999 May; 19(3):230-7. PubMed ID: 10361613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Continuous non-invasive measurement of stroke volume and cardiac index in infants and children: comparison of Impedance Cardiography NICaS® vs CardioQ® method.
    Beck R; Milella L; Labellarte C
    Clin Ter; 2018; 169(3):e110-e113. PubMed ID: 29938742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison between cardiac output determined by impedance cardiography and the rebreathing method during exercise in man.
    Niizeki K; Miyamoto Y; Doi K
    Jpn J Physiol; 1989; 39(3):441-6. PubMed ID: 2796020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cardiac output determined by the CO2 rebreathing method during arm exercise.
    Hopman MT; Oeseburg B; Binkhorst RA
    Clin Physiol; 1994 Jan; 14(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 8149708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Non-invasive measurement of cardiac output by a carbon dioxide rebreathing method at rest and during exercise.
    Nugent AM; McParland J; McEneaney DJ; Steele I; Campbell NP; Stanford CF; Nicholls DP
    Eur Heart J; 1994 Mar; 15(3):361-8. PubMed ID: 8013510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cardiac output in exercise by impedance cardiography during breath holding and normal breathing.
    Du Quesnay MC; Stoute GJ; Hughson RL
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 1987 Jan; 62(1):101-7. PubMed ID: 3104280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Esophageal electrodes allow precise assessment of cardiac output by bioimpedance.
    Balestra B; Malacrida R; Leonardi L; Suter P; Marone C
    Crit Care Med; 1992 Jan; 20(1):62-7. PubMed ID: 1729048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reproducibility of the exponential rise technique of CO(2) rebreathing for measuring P(v)CO(2) and C(v)CO(2 )to non-invasively estimate cardiac output during incremental, maximal treadmill exercise.
    Cade WT; Nabar SR; Keyser RE
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2004 May; 91(5-6):669-76. PubMed ID: 14652761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.