376 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10736252)
1. Sonographically thick placenta: a marker for increased perinatal risk--a prospective cross-sectional study.
Elchalal U; Ezra Y; Levi Y; Bar-Oz B; Yanai N; Intrator O; Nadjari M
Placenta; 2000; 21(2-3):268-72. PubMed ID: 10736252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Twin pregnancies in the second trimester in women in an alpha-fetoprotein screening program: sonographic evaluation and outcome.
Pretorius DH; Budorick NE; Scioscia AL; Krabbe JK; Ko S; Myhre CM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Nov; 161(5):1007-13. PubMed ID: 7506005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Are placental lakes of any clinical significance?
Thompson MO; Vines SK; Aquilina J; Wathen NC; Harrington K
Placenta; 2002; 23(8-9):685-90. PubMed ID: 12361687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Placental hyperinflation and the risk of adverse perinatal outcome.
Porat S; Fitzgerald B; Wright E; Keating S; Kingdom JC
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Sep; 42(3):315-21. PubMed ID: 23288860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sonographic maturation of the placenta at 30 to 34 weeks is not associated with second trimester markers of placental insufficiency in low-risk pregnancies.
Walker MG; Hindmarsh PC; Geary M; Kingdom JCP
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2010 Dec; 32(12):1134-1139. PubMed ID: 21176324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Placental weight and its ratio to birth weight in normal pregnancy at Songkhlanagarind Hospital.
Janthanaphan M; Kor-Anantakul O; Geater A
J Med Assoc Thai; 2006 Feb; 89(2):130-7. PubMed ID: 16578997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fetal magnetic resonance imaging at 36 weeks predicts neonatal macrosomia: the PREMACRO study.
Kadji C; Cannie MM; Kang X; Carlin A; Benjou Etchoua S; Resta S; Dütemeyer V; Abi-Khalil F; Mazzone E; Bevilacqua E; Jani JC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Feb; 226(2):238.e1-238.e12. PubMed ID: 34358479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The risks of spontaneous preterm delivery and perinatal mortality in relation to size at birth according to fetal versus neonatal growth standards.
Lackman F; Capewell V; Richardson B; daSilva O; Gagnon R
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Apr; 184(5):946-53. PubMed ID: 11303203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Characterizing placental stiffness using ultrasound shear-wave elastography in healthy and preeclamptic pregnancies.
Spiliopoulos M; Kuo CY; Eranki A; Jacobs M; Rossi CT; Iqbal SN; Fisher JP; Fries MH; Kim PCW
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2020 Nov; 302(5):1103-1112. PubMed ID: 32676857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Neonatal and maternal outcome after blastocyst transfer: a population-based registry study.
Ginström Ernstad E; Bergh C; Khatibi A; Källén KB; Westlander G; Nilsson S; Wennerholm UB
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Mar; 214(3):378.e1-378.e10. PubMed ID: 26928152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Placental lakes on sonographic examination: correlation with obstetric outcome and pathologic findings.
Reis NS; Brizot ML; Schultz R; Nomura RM; Zugaib M
J Clin Ultrasound; 2005 Feb; 33(2):67-71. PubMed ID: 15674837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ultrasound assessment of placental function: the effectiveness of placental biometry in a low-risk population as a predictor of a small for gestational age neonate.
McGinty P; Farah N; Dwyer VO; Hogan J; Reilly A; Turner MJ; Stuart B; Kennelly MM
Prenat Diagn; 2012 Jul; 32(7):620-6. PubMed ID: 22544542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Placental location and newborn weight.
Devarajan K; Kives S; Ray JG
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2012 Apr; 34(4):325-329. PubMed ID: 22472331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Perinatal events associated with maternal smoking during pregnancy.
Meyer MB; Jonas BS; Tonascia JA
Am J Epidemiol; 1976 May; 103(5):464-76. PubMed ID: 944999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Exploring the relationship between preterm placental calcification and adverse maternal and fetal outcome.
Chen KH; Chen LR; Lee YH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Mar; 37(3):328-34. PubMed ID: 20586039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of prenatal ultrasound screening on perinatal outcome. RADIUS Study Group.
Ewigman BG; Crane JP; Frigoletto FD; LeFevre ML; Bain RP; McNellis D
N Engl J Med; 1993 Sep; 329(12):821-7. PubMed ID: 8355740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The role of second trimester ultrasound in the diagnosis of placental hypoechoic lesions leading to poor pregnancy outcome.
Kofinas A; Kofinas G; Sutija V
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2007 Dec; 20(12):859-66. PubMed ID: 17918033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Association between first-trimester placental volume and birth weight.
Effendi M; Demers S; Giguère Y; Forest JC; Brassard N; Girard M; Gouin K; Bujold E
Placenta; 2014 Feb; 35(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 24345759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The neonatal implications of a high placental ratio in small-for-gestational age infants.
Lao TT; Wong W
Placenta; 1999 Nov; 20(8):723-6. PubMed ID: 10527827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ultrasonographic investigation of placental morphologic characteristics and size during the second trimester of pregnancy.
Jauniaux E; Ramsay B; Campbell S
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Jan; 170(1 Pt 1):130-7. PubMed ID: 7507643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
