208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10736492)
1. Identifying patients who require urodynamic testing before surgery for stress incontinence based on questionnaire information and surgical history.
Lemack GE; Zimmern PE
Urology; 2000 Apr; 55(4):506-11. PubMed ID: 10736492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. INVESTIGATE-I (INVasive Evaluation before Surgical Treatment of Incontinence Gives Added Therapeutic Effect?): a mixed-methods study to assess the feasibility of a future randomised controlled trial of invasive urodynamic testing prior to surgery for stress urinary incontinence in women.
Hilton P; Armstrong N; Brennand C; Howel D; Shen J; Bryant A; Tincello DG; Lucas MG; Buckley BS; Chapple CR; Homer T; Vale L; McColl E;
Health Technol Assess; 2015 Feb; 19(15):1-273, vii-viii. PubMed ID: 25714493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical and demographic factors associated with valsalva leak point pressure among women undergoing burch bladder neck suspension or autologous rectus fascial sling procedures.
Lemack GE; Xu Y; Brubaker L; Nager C; Chai T; Moalli P; Kraus SR; Kerr L; Sirls L; Stoddard A;
Neurourol Urodyn; 2007; 26(3):392-6. PubMed ID: 17304525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predictability of urodynamic findings based on the Urogenital Distress Inventory-6 questionnaire.
Lemack GE; Zimmern PE
Urology; 1999 Sep; 54(3):461-6. PubMed ID: 10475355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Urodynamic evaluation: can it prevent the need for surgical intervention in women with apparent pure stress urinary incontinence?
Serati M; Cattoni E; Siesto G; Braga A; Sorice P; Cantaluppi S; Cromi A; Ghezzi F; Vitobello D; Bolis P; Salvatore S
BJU Int; 2013 Aug; 112(4):E344-50. PubMed ID: 23421421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does preoperative urodynamic testing improve surgical outcomes in patients undergoing the transobturator tape procedure for stress urinary incontinence? A prospective randomized trial.
Agarwal A; Rathi S; Patnaik P; Shaw D; Jain M; Trivedi S; Dwivedi US
Korean J Urol; 2014 Dec; 55(12):821-7. PubMed ID: 25512817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Preoperative clinical, demographic, and urodynamic measures associated with failure to demonstrate urodynamic stress incontinence in women enrolled in two randomized clinical trials of surgery for stress urinary incontinence.
Lemack GE; Litman HJ; Nager C; Brubaker L; Lowder J; Norton P; Sirls L; Lloyd K; Kusek JW;
Int Urogynecol J; 2013 Feb; 24(2):269-74. PubMed ID: 22669421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Could the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence guidelines on urodynamics in urinary incontinence put some women at risk of a bad outcome from stress incontinence surgery?
Agur W; Housami F; Drake M; Abrams P
BJU Int; 2009 Mar; 103(5):635-9. PubMed ID: 19021606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Relationship between urinary incontinence symptoms and urodynamic findings using a validated Arabic questionnaire.
AlTaweel WM; Seyam R; Alsulihem AA
Ann Saudi Med; 2016; 36(5):321-324. PubMed ID: 27710982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The volume at which women leak first on urodynamic testing is not associated with quality of life, measures of urethral integrity or surgical failure.
Lowenstein L; Dooley Y; Kenton K; Rickey L; FitzGerald MP; Mueller E; Brubaker L
J Urol; 2007 Jul; 178(1):193-6. PubMed ID: 17499809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Do women with pure stress urinary incontinence need urodynamics?
Digesu GA; Hendricken C; Fernando R; Khullar V
Urology; 2009 Aug; 74(2):278-81. PubMed ID: 19515404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Urodynamics useless before surgery for female stress urinary incontinence: Are you sure? Results from a multicenter single nation database.
Serati M; Topazio L; Bogani G; Costantini E; Pietropaolo A; Palleschi G; Carbone A; Soligo M; Del Popolo G; Li Marzi V; Salvatore S; Finazzi Agrò E
Neurourol Urodyn; 2016 Sep; 35(7):809-12. PubMed ID: 26061435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Women with pure stress urinary incontinence symptoms assessed by the initial standard evaluation including measurement of post-void residual volume and a stress test: are urodynamic studies still needed?
Jeong SJ; Kim HJ; Lee BK; Rha W; Oh JJ; Jeong CW; Kim JH; Yoon CY; Hong SK; Byun SS; Lee SE
Neurourol Urodyn; 2012 Apr; 31(4):508-12. PubMed ID: 22374678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pure stress urinary incontinence: analysis of prevalence, estimation of costs, and financial impact.
Rubilotta E; Balzarro M; D'Amico A; Cerruto MA; Bassi S; Bovo C; Iacovelli V; Bianchi D; Artibani W; Finazzi Agrò E
BMC Urol; 2019 Jun; 19(1):44. PubMed ID: 31164133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Can maximum urethral closure pressure (MUCP) be used to predict outcome of surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence?
Harris N; Swithinbank L; Hayek SA; Yang Q; Abrams P
Neurourol Urodyn; 2011 Nov; 30(8):1609-12. PubMed ID: 21780164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reference urodynamic values for stress incontinent women.
Nager CW; Albo ME; Fitzgerald MP; McDermott S; Wruck L; Kraus S; Howden N; Norton P; Sirls L; Varner E; Zimmern P;
Neurourol Urodyn; 2007; 26(3):333-40. PubMed ID: 17315221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Role of urodynamics in stress urinary incontinence: A critical appraisal.
Yande SD; Joglekar OV; Joshi M
J Midlife Health; 2016; 7(3):119-125. PubMed ID: 27721639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Normal preoperative urodynamic testing does not predict voiding dysfunction after Burch colposuspension versus pubovaginal sling.
Lemack GE; Krauss S; Litman H; FitzGerald MP; Chai T; Nager C; Sirls L; Zyczynski H; Baker J; Lloyd K; Steers WD;
J Urol; 2008 Nov; 180(5):2076-80. PubMed ID: 18804239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Protocol for the value of urodynamics prior to stress incontinence surgery (VUSIS) study: a multicenter randomized controlled trial to assess the cost effectiveness of urodynamics in women with symptoms of stress urinary incontinence in whom surgical treatment is considered.
van Leijsen SA; Kluivers KB; Mol BW; Broekhuis SR; Milani FL; van der Vaart CH; Roovers JP; Bongers MY; den Boon J; Spaans WA; de Leeuw JW; Dietz V; Kleinjan JH; Brölmann HA; Roos EJ; Schaafstra J; Heesakkers JP; Vierhout ME
BMC Womens Health; 2009 Jul; 9():22. PubMed ID: 19622153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The "1-3-5 cough test": comparing the severity of urodynamic stress incontinence with severity measures of subjective perception of stress urinary incontinence.
Grigoriadis T; Giannoulis G; Zacharakis D; Protopapas A; Cardozo L; Athanasiou S
Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Mar; 27(3):419-25. PubMed ID: 26239956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
