These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1073686)

  • 1. [Fracture strength of amalgam "restorations" made from different alloy particles (author's transl)].
    Pereira JC; Mondelli J
    Estomatol Cult; 1975; 9(2):167-74. PubMed ID: 1073686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Fracture strength of Class II amalgam restorations (author's transl)].
    Coradazzi JL; Mondelli J
    Estomatol Cult; 1972; 6(2):117-24. PubMed ID: 4525849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Fracture strength of amalgam restorations as influenced by silver plates (author's transl)].
    Libis L; Mondelli J; Ishikiriama A
    Estomatol Cult; 1974; 8(2):167-72. PubMed ID: 4535594
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of restoration size on fracture resistance of bonded amalgam restorations.
    Lindemuth JS; Hagge MS; Broome JS
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 11203813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of lining materials on shear bond strength of amalgam and gallium alloy restorations.
    Ng BP; Purton DG; Hood JA
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(3):113-20. PubMed ID: 9656921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fracture strength of classes I and II amalgam restorations condensed on different cement bases.
    Vieira DF; Mondelli J
    Estomatol Cult; 1971; 5(1):28-42. PubMed ID: 5291994
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The tensile strength of amalgam after 15 minutes].
    Spanauf AJ; Vermeersch AG; Vrijhoef MM
    Rev Belge Med Dent; 1976; 31(3):225-32. PubMed ID: 1068493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The microstructure of experimentally restored dental amalgam. (2) Ratio of unreacted original alloy particles to the whole structure (author's transl)].
    Nakai H; Kuragano I; Hashimoto H
    Josai Shika Daigaku Kiyo; 1974; (3):123-6. PubMed ID: 4536044
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical assessments of dental amalgam restorations.
    Mahler DB; Marantz RL
    Int Dent J; 1980 Dec; 30(4):327-34. PubMed ID: 6935163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fracture strength of cusp replacing resin composite restorations.
    Kuijs RH; Fennis WM; Kreulen CM; Roeters JJ; Burgersdijk RC
    Am J Dent; 2003 Feb; 16(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 12744406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Early fracture resistance of amalgapin-retained complex amalgam restorations.
    Schulte GA; Hermesch CB; Vandewalle KS; Buikema DJ
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(3):108-12. PubMed ID: 9656920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of cross-sectional area on transverse strength of Amalgapin-retained restorations.
    Certosimo AJ; House RC; Anderson MH
    Oper Dent; 1991; 16(2):70-6. PubMed ID: 1803331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Study of significant manipulative factor on tensile strength of amalgam 1. Amalgams made from spherical alloy (author's transl)].
    Ohashi M; Hihei M; Hasegawa K; Mera M; Oda K
    Nihon Shika Zairyo Kikai Gakkai Zasshi; 1974 Dec; 31(4):288-96. PubMed ID: 4535006
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of admixed indium on the clinical success of amalgam restorations.
    Johnson GH; Bales DJ; Powell LV
    Oper Dent; 1992; 17(5):196-202. PubMed ID: 1289867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of 4-META adhesive on bond strength and marginal seal of amalgam restorations and repairs--an in vitro study.
    George S; Kuriakose S; Jayalatha NS
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 1996 Jun; 14(2):52-5. PubMed ID: 9522758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A 14-year clinical assessment of 12 amalgam alloys.
    Osborne JW; Norman RD; Gale EN
    Quintessence Int; 1991 Nov; 22(11):857-64. PubMed ID: 1812507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Strength of amalgam restorations bonded with Amalgambond.
    Ianzano JA; Mastrodomenico J; Gwinnett AJ
    Am J Dent; 1993 Feb; 6(1):10-2. PubMed ID: 8329154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [A basic study on gallium alloys for dental restorations. Improvement of liquid gallium alloy].
    Yada I
    Fukuoka Shika Daigaku Gakkai Zasshi; 1989; 16(2):97-117. PubMed ID: 2488904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Corrosion of amalgam restorations in human saliva--an in vitro study (author's transl)].
    Lóssio JJ; Lóssio AG
    Estomatol Cult; 1974; 8(2):199-205. PubMed ID: 4535597
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.