BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10737762)

  • 21. Crystal structure of the GluR0 ligand-binding core from Nostoc punctiforme in complex with L-glutamate: structural dissection of the ligand interaction and subunit interface.
    Lee JH; Kang GB; Lim HH; Jin KS; Kim SH; Ree M; Park CS; Kim SJ; Eom SH
    J Mol Biol; 2008 Feb; 376(2):308-16. PubMed ID: 18164033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. FRalanyzer: a tool for functional analysis of fold-recognition sequence-structure alignments.
    Saini HK; Fischer D
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2007 Jul; 35(Web Server issue):W499-502. PubMed ID: 17537819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. SH3-SPOT: an algorithm to predict preferred ligands to different members of the SH3 gene family.
    Brannetti B; Via A; Cestra G; Cesareni G; Helmer-Citterich M
    J Mol Biol; 2000 Apr; 298(2):313-28. PubMed ID: 10764600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Model structures of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor subunit NR1 explain the molecular recognition of agonist and antagonist ligands.
    Moretti L; Pentikäinen OT; Settimo L; Johnson MS
    J Struct Biol; 2004 Mar; 145(3):205-15. PubMed ID: 14960371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. In silico structural and functional analysis of the human cytomegalovirus (HHV5) genome.
    Novotny J; Rigoutsos I; Coleman D; Shenk T
    J Mol Biol; 2001 Jul; 310(5):1151-66. PubMed ID: 11502002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Recognition of privileged structures by G-protein coupled receptors.
    Bondensgaard K; Ankersen M; Thøgersen H; Hansen BS; Wulff BS; Bywater RP
    J Med Chem; 2004 Feb; 47(4):888-99. PubMed ID: 14761190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Defining the fold space of membrane proteins: the CAMPS database.
    Martin-Galiano AJ; Frishman D
    Proteins; 2006 Sep; 64(4):906-22. PubMed ID: 16802318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Mechanisms for ligand binding to GluR0 ion channels: crystal structures of the glutamate and serine complexes and a closed apo state.
    Mayer ML; Olson R; Gouaux E
    J Mol Biol; 2001 Aug; 311(4):815-36. PubMed ID: 11518533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Search for glucose/galactose-binding proteins in newly discovered protein sequences using molecular modeling techniques and structural analysis.
    Patra M; Mandal C
    Glycobiology; 2006 Oct; 16(10):959-68. PubMed ID: 16835461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Structural divergence and distant relationships in proteins: evolution of the globins.
    Lecomte JT; Vuletich DA; Lesk AM
    Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2005 Jun; 15(3):290-301. PubMed ID: 15922591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Low molecular weight proteins: a challenge for post-genomic research.
    Rudd KE; Humphery-Smith I; Wasinger VC; Bairoch A
    Electrophoresis; 1998 Apr; 19(4):536-44. PubMed ID: 9588799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. LTHREADER: prediction of ligand-receptor interactions using localized threading.
    Pulim V; Bienkowska J; Berger B
    Pac Symp Biocomput; 2007; ():64-75. PubMed ID: 17992745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Protein surface analysis for function annotation in high-throughput structural genomics pipeline.
    Binkowski TA; Joachimiak A; Liang J
    Protein Sci; 2005 Dec; 14(12):2972-81. PubMed ID: 16322579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Sequence variation in ligand binding sites in proteins.
    Magliery TJ; Regan L
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Sep; 6():240. PubMed ID: 16194281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Constituting a receptor-ligand information base from quality-enriched data.
    Hemm K; Aberer K; Hendlich M
    Proc Int Conf Intell Syst Mol Biol; 1995; 3():170-8. PubMed ID: 7584434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Predicting protein function and binding profile via matching of local evolutionary and geometric surface patterns.
    Tseng YY; Dundas J; Liang J
    J Mol Biol; 2009 Mar; 387(2):451-64. PubMed ID: 19154742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Sensing preferences for prokaryotic solute binding protein families.
    Cerna-Vargas JP; Sánchez-Romera B; Matilla MA; Ortega Á; Krell T
    Microb Biotechnol; 2023 Sep; 16(9):1823-1833. PubMed ID: 37547952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Computational analysis of the interaction between ligand-receptor pairs.
    Jiang Z
    Curr Pharm Des; 2008; 14(6):588-92. PubMed ID: 18336302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Computational design of receptors for an organophosphate surrogate of the nerve agent soman.
    Allert M; Rizk SS; Looger LL; Hellinga HW
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2004 May; 101(21):7907-12. PubMed ID: 15148405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Phylogenetic molecular function annotation.
    Engelhardt BE; Jordan MI; Repo ST; Brenner SE
    J Phys Conf Ser; 2009; 180(1):12024. PubMed ID: 20664722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.