These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
326 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10738234)
1. American Joint Committee on Cancer Prognostic Factors Consensus Conference: Colorectal Working Group. Compton C; Fenoglio-Preiser CM; Pettigrew N; Fielding LP Cancer; 2000 Apr; 88(7):1739-57. PubMed ID: 10738234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prognostic factors in colorectal cancer. College of American Pathologists Consensus Statement 1999. Compton CC; Fielding LP; Burgart LJ; Conley B; Cooper HS; Hamilton SR; Hammond ME; Henson DE; Hutter RV; Nagle RB; Nielsen ML; Sargent DJ; Taylor CR; Welton M; Willett C Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2000 Jul; 124(7):979-94. PubMed ID: 10888773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of the seventh edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor-node-metastasis (AJCC TNM) staging in patients with stage II and stage III colorectal carcinoma: analysis of 2511 cases from a medical centre in Korea. Kim KH; Yang SS; Yoon YS; Lim SB; Yu CS; Kim JC Colorectal Dis; 2011 Aug; 13(8):e220-6. PubMed ID: 21689314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. American Joint Committee on Cancer prognostic factors consensus conference. Yarbro JW; Page DL; Fielding LP; Partridge EE; Murphy GP Cancer; 1999 Dec; 86(11):2436-46. PubMed ID: 10590388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Comparison of the predictive value of the sixth and seventh edition TNM pT classifications in prognosis for gastric cancer]. Zhang P; Xu Y; Guo J; Xu H Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2015 Mar; 37(3):190-4. PubMed ID: 25975787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Updates in the Eighth Edition of the Tumor-Node-Metastasis Staging Classification for Urologic Cancers. Paner GP; Stadler WM; Hansel DE; Montironi R; Lin DW; Amin MB Eur Urol; 2018 Apr; 73(4):560-569. PubMed ID: 29325693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prognostic value of the 2002 TNM classification for breast carcinoma with regard to the number of metastatic axillary lymph nodes. Duraker N; Caynak ZC Cancer; 2005 Aug; 104(4):700-7. PubMed ID: 16003773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Treatment of maxillary sinus carcinoma: a comparison of the 1997 and 1977 American Joint Committee on cancer staging systems. Le QT; Fu KK; Kaplan M; Terris DJ; Fee WE; Goffinet DR Cancer; 1999 Nov; 86(9):1700-11. PubMed ID: 10547542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Staging of hepatocellular carcinoma: assessment of the Japanese TNM and AJCC/UICC TNM systems in a cohort of 13,772 patients in Japan. Minagawa M; Ikai I; Matsuyama Y; Yamaoka Y; Makuuchi M Ann Surg; 2007 Jun; 245(6):909-22. PubMed ID: 17522517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen and prognosis of colorectal cancer. An independent prognostic factor still reliable. Li Destri G; Rubino AS; Latino R; Giannone F; Lanteri R; Scilletta B; Di Cataldo A Int Surg; 2015 Apr; 100(4):617-25. PubMed ID: 25875542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validation of a new classification system for curatively resected colorectal adenocarcinoma. Sternberg A; Sibirsky O; Cohen D; Blumenson LE; Petrelli NJ Cancer; 1999 Sep; 86(5):782-92. PubMed ID: 10463976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Introducing the eighth edition of the tumor-node-metastasis classification as relevant to colorectal cancer, anal cancer and appendiceal cancer: a comparison study with the seventh edition of the tumor-node-metastasis and the Japanese Classification of Colorectal, Appendiceal, and Anal Carcinoma. Shida D; Kanemitsu Y; Hamaguchi T; Shimada Y Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2019 Apr; 49(4):321-328. PubMed ID: 30608547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Distant metastases in colorectal carcinoma: A proposal for a new M1 subclassification. Merkel S; Weber K; Croner RS; Golcher H; Göhl J; Agaimy A; Semrau S; Siebler J; Wein A; Hohenberger W; Wittekind C Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1337-42. PubMed ID: 27160353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prognostic significance of DNA ploidy and proliferation in 309 colorectal carcinomas as determined by two-color multiparametric DNA flow cytometry. Zarbo RJ; Nakhleh RE; Brown RD; Kubus JJ; Ma CK; Mackowiak P Cancer; 1997 Jun; 79(11):2073-86. PubMed ID: 9179053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Colorectal carcinoma: selected issues in pathologic examination and staging and determination of prognostic factors. Washington MK Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2008 Oct; 132(10):1600-7. PubMed ID: 18834218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of different staging systems predictability of patient outcome. Thyroid carcinoma as an example. Brierley JD; Panzarella T; Tsang RW; Gospodarowicz MK; O'Sullivan B Cancer; 1997 Jun; 79(12):2414-23. PubMed ID: 9191532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical staging of patients with early esophageal adenocarcinoma: does FDG-PET/CT have a role? Cuellar SL; Carter BW; Macapinlac HA; Ajani JA; Komaki R; Welsh JW; Lee JH; Swisher SG; Correa AM; Erasmus JJ; Hofstetter WL J Thorac Oncol; 2014 Aug; 9(8):1202-6. PubMed ID: 25157774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use of the preoperative levels of CEA in patients with colorectal cancer. Marchena J; Acosta MA; Garcia-Anguiano F; Simpson H; Cruz F Hepatogastroenterology; 2003; 50(52):1017-20. PubMed ID: 12845969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]