These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10738799)

  • 1. Frequency characteristics of sound transmission in middle ears from Norwegian cattle, and the effect of static pressure differences across the tympanic membrane and the footplate.
    Kringlebotn M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Mar; 107(3):1442-50. PubMed ID: 10738799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Frequency characteristics of the middle ear.
    Kringlebotn M; Gundersen T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Jan; 77(1):159-64. PubMed ID: 3973210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acoustic impedances at the oval window, and sound pressure transformation of the middle ear in Norwegian cattle.
    Kringlebotn M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Sep; 108(3 Pt 1):1094-104. PubMed ID: 11008812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sound pressure gain produced by the human middle ear.
    Kurokawa H; Goode RL
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1995 Oct; 113(4):349-55. PubMed ID: 7567003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of static force on round window stimulation with the direct acoustic cochlea stimulator.
    Maier H; Salcher R; Schwab B; Lenarz T
    Hear Res; 2013 Jul; 301():115-24. PubMed ID: 23276731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sound-power collection by the auditory periphery of the mongolian gerbil Meriones unguiculatus. II. External-ear radiation impedance and power collection.
    Ravicz ME; Rosowski JJ; Voigt HF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 May; 99(5):3044-63. PubMed ID: 8642116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of middle ear quasi-static stiffness on sound transmission quantified by a novel 3-axis optical force sensor.
    Dobrev I; Sim JH; Aqtashi B; Huber AM; Linder T; Röösli C
    Hear Res; 2018 Jan; 357():1-9. PubMed ID: 29149722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Normative Wideband Reflectance, Equivalent Admittance at the Tympanic Membrane, and Acoustic Stapedius Reflex Threshold in Adults.
    Feeney MP; Keefe DH; Hunter LL; Fitzpatrick DF; Garinis AC; Putterman DB; McMillan GP
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(3):e142-e160. PubMed ID: 28045835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of Tympanic Membrane Electrodes on Sound Transmission From the Ear Canal to the Middle and Inner Ears.
    Hannon C; Lewis JD
    Ear Hear; 2024 Nov-Dec 01; 45(6):1396-1405. PubMed ID: 38764148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Acoustic mechanisms: canal wall-up versus canal wall-down mastoidectomy.
    Whittemore KR; Merchant SN; Rosowski JJ
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1998 Jun; 118(6):751-61. PubMed ID: 9627232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sound-pressure measurements in the cochlear vestibule of human-cadaver ears.
    Puria S; Peake WT; Rosowski JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 May; 101(5 Pt 1):2754-70. PubMed ID: 9165730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Middle ear pathology can affect the ear-canal sound pressure generated by audiologic earphones.
    Voss SE; Rosowski JJ; Merchant SN; Thornton AR; Shera CA; Peake WT
    Ear Hear; 2000 Aug; 21(4):265-74. PubMed ID: 10981602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of increased inner ear pressure on middle ear mechanics.
    Murakami S; Gyo K; Goode RL
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1998 May; 118(5):703-8. PubMed ID: 9591878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ear canal pressure variations versus negative middle ear pressure: comparison using distortion product otoacoustic emission measurement in humans.
    Sun XM
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 21747284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Human middle-ear sound transfer function and cochlear input impedance.
    Aibara R; Welsh JT; Puria S; Goode RL
    Hear Res; 2001 Feb; 152(1-2):100-9. PubMed ID: 11223285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How does the sound pressure generated by circumaural, supra-aural, and insert earphones differ for adult and infant ears?
    Voss SE; Herrmann BS
    Ear Hear; 2005 Dec; 26(6):636-50. PubMed ID: 16377999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of pars flaccida on sound conduction in ears of Mongolian gerbil: acoustic and anatomical measurements.
    Teoh SW; Flandermeyer DT; Rosowski JJ
    Hear Res; 1997 Apr; 106(1-2):39-65. PubMed ID: 9112106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Measurement of sound pressure level at outlet of external auditory canal and eardrum].
    Liu JL; Qin XL; Wang LH; Liang CY; Jiang T
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2003 Oct; 21(5):353-5. PubMed ID: 14761398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sound pressure distribution and power flow within the gerbil ear canal from 100 Hz to 80 kHz.
    Ravicz ME; Olson ES; Rosowski JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2154-73. PubMed ID: 17902852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Measurements of the acoustic input impedance of cat ears: 10 Hz to 20 kHz.
    Lynch TJ; Peake WT; Rosowski JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Oct; 96(4):2184-209. PubMed ID: 7963032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.