BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

570 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10738809)

  • 1. Acoustic mechanisms that determine the ear-canal sound pressures generated by earphones.
    Voss SE; Rosowski JJ; Shera CA; Peake WT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Mar; 107(3):1548-65. PubMed ID: 10738809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Middle ear pathology can affect the ear-canal sound pressure generated by audiologic earphones.
    Voss SE; Rosowski JJ; Merchant SN; Thornton AR; Shera CA; Peake WT
    Ear Hear; 2000 Aug; 21(4):265-74. PubMed ID: 10981602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How does the sound pressure generated by circumaural, supra-aural, and insert earphones differ for adult and infant ears?
    Voss SE; Herrmann BS
    Ear Hear; 2005 Dec; 26(6):636-50. PubMed ID: 16377999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pure-Tone Audiometry With Forward Pressure Level Calibration Leads to Clinically-Relevant Improvements in Test-Retest Reliability.
    Lapsley Miller JA; Reed CM; Robinson SR; Perez ZD
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):946-957. PubMed ID: 29470259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of inter-aural attenuation with the Etymotic ER-3A insert earphone and the Telephonics TDH-39 supra-aural earphone.
    Munro KJ; Agnew N
    Br J Audiol; 1999 Aug; 33(4):259-62. PubMed ID: 10509860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of Two Circumaural Earphones for Audiometry.
    Smull CC; Madsen B; Margolis RH
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):177-183. PubMed ID: 29742546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ear canal pressure variations versus negative middle ear pressure: comparison using distortion product otoacoustic emission measurement in humans.
    Sun XM
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 21747284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measuring the real-ear to coupler difference transfer function with an insert earphone and a hearing instrument: are they the same?
    Munro KJ; Toal S
    Ear Hear; 2005 Feb; 26(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 15692302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison between intensity and pressure as measures of sound level in the ear canal.
    Neely ST; Gorga MP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Nov; 104(5):2925-34. PubMed ID: 9821338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of the chinchilla pinna and ear canal in electrophysiological measures of hearing thresholds.
    Murphy WJ; Davis RR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Apr; 103(4):1951-6. PubMed ID: 9566318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Equivalent threshold sound pressure levels (ETSPL) for Sennheiser HDA 280 supra-aural audiometric earphones in the frequency range 125 Hz to 8000 Hz.
    Poulsen T; Oakley S
    Int J Audiol; 2009 May; 48(5):271-6. PubMed ID: 19842802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tests of some common assumptions of ear-canal acoustics in cats.
    Huang GT; Rosowski JJ; Puria S; Peake WT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Sep; 108(3 Pt 1):1147-61. PubMed ID: 11008816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sound pressure in insert earphone couplers and real ears.
    Burkhard MD; Sachs RM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1977 Dec; 20(4):799-807. PubMed ID: 604691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reflectance Measures from Infant Ears With Normal Hearing and Transient Conductive Hearing Loss.
    Voss SE; Herrmann BS; Horton NJ; Amadei EA; Kujawa SG
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):560-71. PubMed ID: 27050773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A model of the occlusion effect with bone-conducted stimulation.
    Stenfelt S; Reinfeldt S
    Int J Audiol; 2007 Oct; 46(10):595-608. PubMed ID: 17922349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Audiometric earphone discomfort level and hearing aid saturation sound pressure level for a 90 decibel input signal (SSPL90) as measured in the human ear canal.
    Leijon A; Harford E; Lidén G; Ringdahl A; Dahlberg AK
    Ear Hear; 1983; 4(4):185-9. PubMed ID: 6618037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Low body mass index and jaw movement are protective of hearing in users of personal listening devices.
    Li LP; Chuang AY; McMahon C; Tung TH; Chen JK
    Laryngoscope; 2013 Aug; 123(8):1983-7. PubMed ID: 23553325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A new method to estimate sound energy entering the middle ear.
    Chen S; Deng J; Bian L; Li G
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():29-32. PubMed ID: 24109616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measurement of acoustic impedance and reflectance in the human ear canal.
    Voss SE; Allen JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Jan; 95(1):372-84. PubMed ID: 8120248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Coupling of earphones to human ears and to standard coupler.
    Cirić DG; Hammershøi D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Oct; 120(4):2096-107. PubMed ID: 17069307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 29.