These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10738953)

  • 1. Assessment of a response bias for aggression over functionally equivalent appropriate behavior.
    DeLeon IG; Fisher WW; Herman KM; Crosland KC
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(1):73-7. PubMed ID: 10738953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating the effects of functional communication training in the presence and absence of establishing operations.
    Brown KA; Wacker DP; Derby KM; Peck SM; Richman DM; Sasso GM; Knutson CL; Harding JW
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(1):53-71. PubMed ID: 10738952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Preference for reinforcers under progressive- and fixed-ratio schedules: a comparison of single and concurrent arrangements.
    Glover AC; Roane HS; Kadey HJ; Grow LL
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2008; 41(2):163-76. PubMed ID: 18595281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating self-control and impulsivity in children with severe behavior disorders.
    Vollmer TR; Borrero JC; Lalli JS; Daniel D
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1999; 32(4):451-66. PubMed ID: 10641300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Obtained versus programmed reinforcement practical considerations in the treatment of escape-reinforced aggression.
    Johnson L; McComas J; Thompson A; Symons FJ
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2004; 37(2):239-42. PubMed ID: 15293645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Management of multiple aggressive behaviors by differential reinforcement.
    Luiselli JK; Slocumb PR
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 1983 Dec; 14(4):343-7. PubMed ID: 6662965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Differential impact of response effort within a response chain on use of mands in a student with autism.
    Buckley SD; Newchok DK
    Res Dev Disabil; 2005; 26(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 15590240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Further examination of factors that influence preference for positive versus negative reinforcement.
    Kodak T; Lerman DC; Volkert VM; Trosclair N
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2007; 40(1):25-44. PubMed ID: 17471792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reducing escape behavior and increasing task completion with functional communication training, extinction, and response chaining.
    Lalli JS; Casey S; Kates K
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1995; 28(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 7592143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using a choice assessment to predict reinforcer effectiveness.
    Piazza CC; Fisher WW; Hagopian LP; Bowman LG; Toole L
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1996; 29(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 8881340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. My 19-year-old son has autism and moderate mental retardation. What can I do to make him less passive?
    Harris SL
    J Autism Dev Disord; 2005 Feb; 35(1):137. PubMed ID: 15796130
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing the value of token reinforcement for individuals with autism.
    Fiske KE; Isenhower RW; Bamond MJ; Delmolino L; Sloman KN; LaRue RH
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2015; 48(2):448-53. PubMed ID: 25930718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Concurrent reinforcement schedules: behavior change and maintenance without extinction.
    Hoch H; McComas JJ; Thompson AL; Paone D
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2002; 35(2):155-69. PubMed ID: 12102135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Noncontingent reinforcement: effects of satiation versus choice responding.
    Fisher WW; Thompson RH; DeLeon IG; Piazza CC; Kuhn DE; Rodriguez-Catter V; Adelinis JD
    Res Dev Disabil; 1999; 20(6):411-27. PubMed ID: 10641251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Reducing self-injurious behaviour through functional communication training--a single case study].
    Bienstein P; Nussbeck S
    Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr Psychother; 2009 Nov; 37(6):559-68. PubMed ID: 19890819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating the reinforcing effects of choice in comparison to reinforcement rate.
    Thompson RH; Fisher WW; Contrucci SA
    Res Dev Disabil; 1998; 19(2):181-7. PubMed ID: 9547528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Response allocation to concurrent fixed-ratio reinforcement schedules with work requirements by adults with mental retardation and typical preschool children.
    Cuvo AJ; Lerch LJ; Leurquin DA; Gaffaney TJ; Poppen RL
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1998; 31(1):43-63. PubMed ID: 9532750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of nonexclusionary timeout for the elimination of a stereotyped behavior.
    McKeegan GF; Estill K; Campbell BM
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 1984 Sep; 15(3):261-4. PubMed ID: 6490938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reinforcer variation: implications for motivating developmentally disabled children.
    Egel AL
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1981; 14(3):345-50. PubMed ID: 7298543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A stimulus control technique for improving the efficacy of an established toilet training program.
    Taylor S; Cipani E; Clardy A
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 1994 Jun; 25(2):155-60. PubMed ID: 7983227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.