BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

353 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10738954)

  • 1. The effects of noncontingent delivery of high- and low-preference stimuli on attention-maintained destructive behavior.
    Fisher WW; O'Connor JT; Kurtz PF; DeLeon IG; Gotjen DL
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 10738954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Noncontingent reinforcement as treatment for severe problem behavior: some procedural variations.
    Lalli JS; Casey SD; Kates K
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(1):127-36; quiz 136-7. PubMed ID: 9103988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Noncontingent reinforcement: effects of satiation versus choice responding.
    Fisher WW; Thompson RH; DeLeon IG; Piazza CC; Kuhn DE; Rodriguez-Catter V; Adelinis JD
    Res Dev Disabil; 1999; 20(6):411-27. PubMed ID: 10641251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of noncontingent access to food on the rate of object mouthing across three settings.
    Roane HS; Kelly ML; Fisher WW
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2003; 36(4):579-82. PubMed ID: 14768675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the establishing and reinforcing effects of termination of demands for destructive behavior maintained by positive and negative reinforcement.
    Piazza CC; Hanley GP; Fisher WW; Ruyter JM; Gulotta CS
    Res Dev Disabil; 1998; 19(5):395-407. PubMed ID: 9770252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Noncontingent reinforcement: a further examination of schedule effects during treatment.
    Wallace MD; Iwata BA; Hanley GP; Thompson RH; Roscoe EM
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2012; 45(4):709-19. PubMed ID: 23322927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Schedule effects of noncontingent reinforcement on attention-maintained destructive behavior in identical quadruplets.
    Hagopian LP; Fisher WW; Legacy SM
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1994; 27(2):317-25. PubMed ID: 8063630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of alternative responses on behavior exposed to noncontingent reinforcement.
    Virues-Ortega J; Iwata BA; Fahmie TA; Harper JM
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2013; 46(3):603-12. PubMed ID: 24114223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A preliminary procedure for predicting the positive and negative effects of reinforcement-based procedures.
    Piazza CC; Fisher WW; Hanley GP; Hilker K; Derby KM
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1996; 29(2):137-52. PubMed ID: 8682733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of noncontingent reinforcement on problem behavior and stimulus engagement: the role of satiation, extinction, and alternative reinforcement.
    Hagopian LP; Crockett JL; van Stone M; DeLeon IG; Bowman LG
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(4):433-49. PubMed ID: 11214021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An evaluation of the effects of matched stimuli on behaviors maintained by automatic reinforcement.
    Piazza CC; Adelinis JD; Hanley GP; Goh HL; Delia MD
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(1):13-27. PubMed ID: 10738949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Brief report: Signals enhance the suppressive effects of noncontingent reinforcement.
    Ringdahl JE; Call NA; Christensen T; Boelter EW
    J Autism Dev Disord; 2010 Mar; 40(3):378-82. PubMed ID: 19777331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Further examination of factors that influence preference for positive versus negative reinforcement.
    Kodak T; Lerman DC; Volkert VM; Trosclair N
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2007; 40(1):25-44. PubMed ID: 17471792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of attention in the treatment of attention-maintained self-injurious behavior: noncontingent reinforcement and differential reinforcement of other behavior.
    Vollmer TR; Iwata BA; Zarcone JR; Smith RG; Mazaleski JL
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1993; 26(1):9-21. PubMed ID: 8473262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Facilitating tolerance of delayed reinforcement during functional communication training.
    Fisher WW; Thompson RH; Hagopian LP; Bowman LG; Krug A
    Behav Modif; 2000 Jan; 24(1):3-29. PubMed ID: 10641365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Responding maintained by intermittent reinforcement: implications for the use of extinction with problem behavior in clinical settings.
    Lerman DC; Iwata BA; Shore BA; Kahng SW
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1996; 29(2):153-71. PubMed ID: 8682734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Decreasing excessive functional communication responses while treating destructive behavior using response restriction.
    Fisher WW; Greer BD; Querim AC; DeRosa N
    Res Dev Disabil; 2014 Nov; 35(11):2614-23. PubMed ID: 25036315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Noncontingent presentation of attention and alternative stimuli in the treatment of attention-maintained destructive behavior.
    Hanley GP; Piazza CC; Fisher WW
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(2):229-37. PubMed ID: 9210303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of contingent and noncontingent attention on self-injury and self-restraint.
    Derby KM; Fisher WW; Piazza CC
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1996; 29(1):107-10. PubMed ID: 8881350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of reinforcement choice on task responding in individuals with developmental disabilities.
    Lerman DC; Iwata BA; Rainville B; Adelinis JD; Crosland K; Kogan J
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(3):411-22. PubMed ID: 9316256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.