These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

355 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10738954)

  • 21. Noncontingent reinforcement is an empirically supported treatment for problem behavior exhibited by individuals with developmental disabilities.
    Carr JE; Severtson JM; Lepper TL
    Res Dev Disabil; 2009; 30(1):44-57. PubMed ID: 18467073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effect of noncontingent sensory reinforcement, contingent sensory reinforcement, and response interruption on stereotypical and self-injurious behavior.
    Sprague J; Holland K; Thomas K
    Res Dev Disabil; 1997; 18(1):61-77. PubMed ID: 9085430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An analysis of reinforcer substitutability using object manipulation and self-injury as competing responses.
    Shore BA; Iwata BA; DeLeon IG; Kahng S; Smith RG
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(1):21-41. PubMed ID: 9103985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of reinforcer consumption and magnitude on response rates during noncontingent reinforcement.
    Roscoe EM; Iwata BA; Rand MS
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2003; 36(4):525-39. PubMed ID: 14768670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Nondirective prompting and noncontingent reinforcement in the treatment of destructive behavior during hygiene routines.
    Piazza CC; Contrucci SA; Hanley GP; Fisher WW
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(4):705-8. PubMed ID: 9433795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Variable-time reinforcement schedules in the treatment of socially maintained problem behavior.
    Van Camp CM; Lerman DC; Kelley ME; Contrucci SA; Vorndran CM
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(4):545-57. PubMed ID: 11214030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Analysis of the reinforcement and extinction components in DRO contingencies with self-injury.
    Mazaleski JL; Iwata BA; Vollmer TR; Zarcone JR; Smith RG
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1993; 26(2):143-56. PubMed ID: 8331012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Noncontingent reinforcement: Arbitrary versus maintaining reinforcers for escape-maintained problem behavior.
    Newman ZA; Roscoe EM; Errera NP; Davis CR
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2021 Jun; 54(3):984-1000. PubMed ID: 33667327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A variation of noncontingent reinforcement in the treatment of aberrant behavior.
    Britton LN; Carr JE; Kellum KK; Dozier CL; Weil TM
    Res Dev Disabil; 2000; 21(6):425-35. PubMed ID: 11153827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A multicomponent approach to thinning reinforcer delivery during noncontingent reinforcement schedules.
    Slocum SK; Grauerholz-Fisher E; Peters KP; Vollmer TR
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2018 Jan; 51(1):61-69. PubMed ID: 29226346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Treatment efficacy of noncontingent reinforcement during brief and extended application.
    Lindberg JS; Iwata BA; Roscoe EM; Worsdell AS; Hanley GP
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2003; 36(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 12723863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Negative side effects of noncontingent reinforcement.
    Vollmer TR; Ringdahl JE; Roane HS; Marcus BA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(1):161-4. PubMed ID: 9157097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Enhancing the effects of extinction on attention-maintained behavior through noncontingent delivery of attention or stimuli identified via a competing stimulus assessment.
    Fisher WW; DeLeon IG; Rodriguez-Catter V; Keeney KM
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2004; 37(2):171-84. PubMed ID: 15293636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Extinction and DRO in the treatment of aggression in a boy with severe mental retardation.
    Figueroa RG; Thyer BA; Thyer KB
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 1992 Jun; 23(2):133-40. PubMed ID: 1460100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Concurrent reinforcement schedules: behavior change and maintenance without extinction.
    Hoch H; McComas JJ; Thompson AL; Paone D
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2002; 35(2):155-69. PubMed ID: 12102135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Relative versus absolute reinforcement effects: implications for preference assessments.
    Roscoe EM; Iwata BA; Kahng S
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1999; 32(4):479-93. PubMed ID: 10641302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A method for identifying satiation versus extinction effects under noncontingent reinforcement schedules.
    Kahng SW; Iwata BA; Thompson RH; Hanley GP
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(4):419-32. PubMed ID: 11214020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A brief method for conducting a negative-reinforcement assessment.
    Zarcone JR; Crosland K; Fisher WW; Worsdell AS; Herman K
    Res Dev Disabil; 1999; 20(2):107-24. PubMed ID: 10198942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The treatment of covert self-injury through contingencies on response products.
    Grace NC; Thompson R; Fisher WW
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1996; 29(2):239-42. PubMed ID: 8682739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Empirically derived consequences: a data-based method for prescribing treatments for destructive behavior.
    Fisher W; Piazza CC; Bowman LG; Hagopian LP; Langdon NA
    Res Dev Disabil; 1994; 15(2):133-49. PubMed ID: 8085030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.