184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10738957)
1. Effects of choice of stimuli as reinforcement for task responding in reinforcement for task responding in preschoolers with and without developmental disabilities.
Waldron-Soler KM; Martella RC; Marchand-Martella NE; Ebey TL
J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(1):93-6. PubMed ID: 10738957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of subject- versus experimenter-selected reinforcers on the behavior of individuals with profound developmental disabilities.
Smith RG; Iwata BA; Shore BA
J Appl Behav Anal; 1995; 28(1):61-71. PubMed ID: 7706151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Further evaluation of low-ranked items in stimulus-choice preference assessments.
Taravella CC; Lerman DC; Contrucci SA; Roane HS
J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(1):105-8. PubMed ID: 10738960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effects of establishing operations on preference assessment outcomes.
Gottschalk JM; Libby ME; Graff RB
J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(1):85-8. PubMed ID: 10738955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An evaluation of a stimulus preference assessment of auditory stimuli for adolescents with developmental disabilities.
Horrocks E; Higbee TS
Res Dev Disabil; 2008; 29(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 17097267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Two measures of preference during forced-choice assessments.
Derby KM; Wacker DP; Andelman M; Berg W; Drew J; Asmus J; Prouty AM; Laffey P
J Appl Behav Anal; 1995; 28(3):345-6. PubMed ID: 7592152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of a brief stimulus preference assessment.
Roane HS; Vollmer TR; Ringdahl JE; Marcus BA
J Appl Behav Anal; 1998; 31(4):605-20. PubMed ID: 9891397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Response acquisition under direct and indirect contingencies of reinforcement.
Thompson RH; Iwata BA
J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 10738948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of reinforcement choice on task responding in individuals with developmental disabilities.
Lerman DC; Iwata BA; Rainville B; Adelinis JD; Crosland K; Kogan J
J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(3):411-22. PubMed ID: 9316256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effects of choice and task preference on the work performance of adults with severe disabilities.
Bambara LM; Ager C; Koger F
J Appl Behav Anal; 1994; 27(3):555-6. PubMed ID: 7928796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of systematically depriving access to computer-based stimuli on choice responding with individuals with intellectual disabilities.
Reyer HS; Sturmey P
Res Dev Disabil; 2009; 30(6):1177-87. PubMed ID: 19577424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Preference assessment procedures for individuals with developmental disabilities.
Hagopian LP; Long ES; Rush KS
Behav Modif; 2004 Sep; 28(5):668-77. PubMed ID: 15296524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pre-assessment exposure to schedule-correlated stimuli affects choice responding for tasks.
Kelley ME; Shamlian K; Lomas JE; Pabico RS
Res Dev Disabil; 2011; 32(2):527-31. PubMed ID: 21232917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Further examination of factors that influence preference for positive versus negative reinforcement.
Kodak T; Lerman DC; Volkert VM; Trosclair N
J Appl Behav Anal; 2007; 40(1):25-44. PubMed ID: 17471792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An evaluation of the use of eye gaze to measure preference of individuals with severe physical and developmental disabilities.
Fleming CV; Wheeler GM; Cannella-Malone HI; Basbagill AR; Chung YC; Day KG
Dev Neurorehabil; 2010; 13(4):266-75. PubMed ID: 20629593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reinforcer assessment for children with developmental disabilities and visual impairments.
Paclawskyj TR; Vollmer TR
J Appl Behav Anal; 1995; 28(2):219-24. PubMed ID: 7541398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Preferred curricular activities and reduced problem behaviors in students with intellectual disabilities.
Foster-Johnson L; Ferro J; Dunlap G
J Appl Behav Anal; 1994; 27(3):493-504. PubMed ID: 7928791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities.
Fisher W; Piazza CC; Bowman LG; Hagopian LP; Owens JC; Slevin I
J Appl Behav Anal; 1992; 25(2):491-8. PubMed ID: 1634435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of preference for varied versus constant reinforcers.
Bowman LG; Piazza CC; Fisher WW; Hagopian LP; Kogan JS
J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(3):451-8. PubMed ID: 9316258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparing preference assessments: selection- versus duration-based preference assessment procedures.
Kodak T; Fisher WW; Kelley ME; Kisamore A
Res Dev Disabil; 2009; 30(5):1068-77. PubMed ID: 19327964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
