These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10739125)

  • 1. Classifying genealogical origins in hybrid populations using dominant markers.
    Miller LM
    J Hered; 2000; 91(1):46-9. PubMed ID: 10739125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantitative trait locus analysis of hybrid pedigrees: variance-components model, inbreeding parameter, and power.
    Svischeva GR
    BMC Genet; 2007 Jul; 8():50. PubMed ID: 17651509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Analysis of quantitative trait loci using hybrid pedigrees: quantitative traits of animals].
    Svishcheva GR
    Genetika; 2007 Feb; 43(2):265-75. PubMed ID: 17385327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. New statistical methods for estimation of recombination fractions in F
    Tan YD; Zhang XHF; Mo Q
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Oct; 18(Suppl 11):404. PubMed ID: 28984187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The use of the expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm for maximum likelihood estimation of gametic frequencies of multilocus polymorphic codominant systems based on sampled population data].
    Sergeev AS; Arapova RK
    Genetika; 2002 Mar; 38(3):407-18. PubMed ID: 11963570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Efficiency of model-based Bayesian methods for detecting hybrid individuals under different hybridization scenarios and with different numbers of loci.
    Vähä JP; Primmer CR
    Mol Ecol; 2006 Jan; 15(1):63-72. PubMed ID: 16367830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An efficient exact algorithm for identifying hybrids using population genomic sequences.
    Chakraborty S; Rannala B
    Genetics; 2023 Apr; 223(4):. PubMed ID: 36708142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Neighbour joining trees, dominant markers and population genetic structure.
    Hollingsworth PM; Ennos RA
    Heredity (Edinb); 2004 Jun; 92(6):490-8. PubMed ID: 15026781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimating pairwise relatedness from dominant genetic markers.
    Wang J
    Mol Ecol; 2004 Oct; 13(10):3169-78. PubMed ID: 15367129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Mutation variability and marker trait inheritance in hybrid-mutant populations F2M2 of winter wheat].
    Dubovyĭ VI; Khomenko SO; Chuhunkova TV
    Tsitol Genet; 2004; 38(6):13-8. PubMed ID: 15882029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development of diagnostic microsatellite markers from whole-genome sequences of Ammodramus sparrows for assessing admixture in a hybrid zone.
    Kovach AI; Walsh J; Ramsdell J; Kelley Thomas W
    Ecol Evol; 2015 Jun; 5(11):2267-83. PubMed ID: 26078861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of locus number, genetic divergence, and genotyping error on the utility of dominant markers for hybrid identification.
    Sovic MG; Kubatko LS; Fuerst PA
    Ecol Evol; 2014 Feb; 4(4):462-73. PubMed ID: 24634730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Monitoring genetic diversity in tropical trees with multilocus dominant markers.
    Kremer A; Caron H; Cavers S; Colpaert N; Gheysen G; Gribel R; Lemes M; Lowe AJ; Margis R; Navarro C; Salgueiro F
    Heredity (Edinb); 2005 Oct; 95(4):274-80. PubMed ID: 16106259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Maximum likelihood techniques for the mapping and analysis of quantitative trait loci with the aid of genetic markers.
    Weller JI
    Biometrics; 1986 Sep; 42(3):627-40. PubMed ID: 3567295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Linkage analysis using direct and indirect counting and relative efficiencies for codominant and dominant loci.
    Da Y; Garbe J; London N; Xu J
    J Anim Sci; 2002 Oct; 80(10):2528-39. PubMed ID: 12413074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Molecular identification of variety purity in a cotton hybrid with unknown parentage using DNA-SSR markers.
    Fu XQ; Yang FX; Lu XK; Wang XG; Yang BX; Liu FJ; Liu Y; Peng J
    Genet Mol Res; 2017 Sep; 16(3):. PubMed ID: 28973776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A likelihood approach for mapping growth trajectories using dominant markers in a phase-unknown full-sib family.
    Ma CX; Lin M; Littell RC; Yin T; Wu R
    Theor Appl Genet; 2004 Feb; 108(4):699-705. PubMed ID: 14586505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. parallelnewhybrid: an R package for the parallelization of hybrid detection using newhybrids.
    Wringe BF; Stanley RR; Jeffery NW; Anderson EC; Bradbury IR
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2017 Jan; 17(1):91-95. PubMed ID: 27617417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimation of pairwise relatedness with molecular markers.
    Lynch M; Ritland K
    Genetics; 1999 Aug; 152(4):1753-66. PubMed ID: 10430599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A note on the estimation of the effective number of additive and dominant loci contributing to quantitative variation.
    Ollivier L; Janss LL
    Genetics; 1993 Nov; 135(3):907-9. PubMed ID: 8293987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.