116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10739319)
1. Shortcomings of low-cost imaging systems for viewing computed radiographs.
Ricke J; Hänninen EL; Zielinski C; Amthauer H; Stroszczynski C; Liebig T; Wolf M; Hosten N
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2000; 24(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 10739319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A windows based viewing application for image postprocessing in DICOM format.
Gillessen C; Ricke J; Haderer A; Zielinski C; Teichgräber U; Ehrenstein T; Felix R
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2000; 77():1206-9. PubMed ID: 11187513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Personal computer versus workstation display: observer performance in detection of wrist fractures on digital radiographs.
Doyle AJ; Le Fevre J; Anderson GD
Radiology; 2005 Dec; 237(3):872-7. PubMed ID: 16237135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Wavelet versus JPEG (Joint Photographic Expert Group) and fractal compression. Impact on the detection of low-contrast details in computed radiographs.
Ricke J; Maass P; Lopez Hänninen E; Liebig T; Amthauer H; Stroszczynski C; Schauer W; Boskamp T; Wolf M
Invest Radiol; 1998 Aug; 33(8):456-63. PubMed ID: 9704285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of color LCD and medical-grade monochrome LCD displays in diagnostic radiology.
Geijer H; Geijer M; Forsberg L; Kheddache S; Sund P
J Digit Imaging; 2007 Jun; 20(2):114-21. PubMed ID: 17340227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Characterization of color CRT display systems for monochrome applications.
Spekowius G
J Digit Imaging; 1999 Aug; 12(3):102-13. PubMed ID: 10461573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of monitors on approximal caries detection in digital radiographs--standard versus precalibrated DICOM part 14 displays: an in vitro study.
Hellén-Halme K; Nilsson M; Petersson A
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 May; 107(5):716-20. PubMed ID: 19201219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Evaluation of image quality using the normalized-rank approach for primary class liquid-crystal display (LCD) monitors with different colors and resolution].
Kuroki H; Katayama R; Sakaguchi T; Maeda T; Morishita J; Hayabuchi N
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2010 Nov; 66(11):1423-31. PubMed ID: 21099172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Evaluation of the display quality of different modalities in digital radiology].
Lehmkuhl L; Mulzer J; Teichgraeber U; Gillessen C; Ehrenstein T; Ricke J
Rofo; 2004 Jul; 176(7):1031-8. PubMed ID: 15237347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Image quality degradation by light scattering in display devices.
Flynn MJ; Badano A
J Digit Imaging; 1999 May; 12(2):50-9. PubMed ID: 10342247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Generating high gray-level resolution monochrome displays with conventional computer graphics cards and color monitors.
Li X; Lu ZL; Xu P; Jin J; Zhou Y
J Neurosci Methods; 2003 Nov; 130(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 14583400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Receiver operating characteristic evaluation of computer display of adult portable chest radiographs.
Krupinski EA; Maloney K; Bessen SC; Capp MP; Graham K; Hunt R; Lund P; Ovitt T; Standen JR
Invest Radiol; 1994 Feb; 29(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 8169087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Digital luminescence radiography using a chest phantom. Comparison between radiographs displayed on monitor at a workstation and at a personal.
Lyttkens K; Kehler M; Andersson B; Carlsen S; Ebbesen A; Hochbergs P; Strömbäck A
Acta Radiol; 1993 Sep; 34(5):440-4. PubMed ID: 8369178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Comparative findings of digital thoracic images and digital images of statistical phantoms as film copy, a radiological work station and a PC].
Ricke J; Wolf M; Zielinski C; Hosten N; Liebig T; Amthauer H; Hänninen EL; Schumacher T; Stroszczynski C; Bergh B; Emmel D; Schauer W
Rofo; 1998 Mar; 168(3):264-9. PubMed ID: 9551113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Personal computer-based PACS display system: comparison with a dedicated PACS workstation for review of computed radiographic images in rheumatoid arthritis.
Doyle AJ; Gunn ML; Gamble GD; Zhang M
Acad Radiol; 2002 Jun; 9(6):646-53. PubMed ID: 12061738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Perception of detail and greyscale range in X-ray fluoroscopy images captured with a personal computer and frame-grabber.
Okkalides D
Eur J Radiol; 1996 Sep; 23(2):149-58. PubMed ID: 8886729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Image analyzers for bioscience applications.
Ramm P
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 1990; 14(5):287-306. PubMed ID: 2224828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of grayscale and color-scale renderings of digital medical images for diagnostic interpretation.
Ogura A; Kamakura A; Kaneko Y; Kitaoka T; Hayashi N; Taniguchi A
Radiol Phys Technol; 2017 Sep; 10(3):359-363. PubMed ID: 28349435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Three monochrome displays from a single, true color video display controller.
Raff U; Spitzer VM
J Digit Imaging; 1991 Feb; 4(1):28-38. PubMed ID: 2029570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Design of a medical image processing software for clinical-PACS.
Yoo SK; Kim KM; Kim NH; Huh JM; Chang BC; Cho BK
Yonsei Med J; 1997 Aug; 38(4):193-201. PubMed ID: 9339126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
