These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10739319)

  • 41. [Comparison of four digital and one conventional radiographic image systems for the chest in a patient study with subsequent system optimization].
    Redlich U; Hoeschen C; Effenberger O; Fessel A; Preuss H; Reissberg S; Scherlach C; Döhring W
    Rofo; 2005 Feb; 177(2):272-8. PubMed ID: 15666237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Compressed radiological images and workstation viewing.
    Wilson DL
    J Digit Imaging; 1992 Aug; 5(3):168-75. PubMed ID: 1520743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of chest image interpretation with conventional, laser-printed, and high-resolution workstation images.
    Slasky BS; Gur D; Good WF; Costa-Greco MA; Harris KM; Cooperstein LA; Rockette HE
    Radiology; 1990 Mar; 174(3 Pt 1):775-80. PubMed ID: 2305061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Interactive PC-based volume rendering of CT datasets.
    von Jan U; Shin H; Overhoff HM; Matthies HK
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2002; 47 Suppl 1 Pt 2():615-8. PubMed ID: 12465254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Comparison of conventional and computed radiography: assessment of image quality and reader performance in skeletal extremity trauma.
    Lund PJ; Krupinski EA; Pereles S; Mockbee B
    Acad Radiol; 1997 Aug; 4(8):570-6. PubMed ID: 9261456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A simple method for extracting DICOM images from a magnetooptic disk.
    Yam CS; Sitek A; Raptopoulos V; Larson M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Aug; 183(2):529-33. PubMed ID: 15269052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Development of a low-cost DICOM-server for teaching and research purposes.
    Sparacia G; Carollo V; La Tona G; Cardinale AE
    Radiol Med; 2004; 107(1-2):98-101. PubMed ID: 15031701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Comparison of the detectability of high- and low-contrast details on a TFT screen and a CRT screen designed for radiologic diagnosis.
    Kotter E; Bley TA; Saueressig U; Fisch D; Springer O; Winterer JT; Schaefer O; Langer M
    Invest Radiol; 2003 Nov; 38(11):719-24. PubMed ID: 14566182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Image quality measurements in radiology.
    Tapiovaara M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):116-9. PubMed ID: 16461535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Application of off-line image processing for optimization in chest computed radiography using a low cost system.
    Muhogora WE; Msaki P; Padovani R
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Mar; 16(2):4774. PubMed ID: 26103165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Improvement of image quality in PET using post-reconstruction hybrid spatial-frequency domain filtering.
    Arabi H; Zaidi H
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Oct; 63(21):215010. PubMed ID: 30272565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Evaluation of low-cost computer monitors for the detection of cervical spine injuries in the emergency room: an observer confidence-based study.
    Brem MH; Böhner C; Brenning A; Gelse K; Radkow T; Blanke M; Schlechtweg PM; Neumann G; Wu IY; Bautz W; Hennig FF; Richter H
    Emerg Med J; 2006 Nov; 23(11):850-3. PubMed ID: 17057136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Use of a low-cost, PC-based image review workstation at a radiology department.
    Passadore DJ; Isoardi RA; Ariza PP; Padín C
    J Digit Imaging; 2001 Jun; 14(2 Suppl 1):222-3. PubMed ID: 11442105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Development and evaluation of different methods to assess download and display time of image web systems.
    Pietsch M; Schlaefke A; Vogl TJ; Bergh B
    J Digit Imaging; 2006 Dec; 19(4):336-45. PubMed ID: 16964562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Why and how is soft copy reading possible in clinical practice?
    Mertelmeier T
    J Digit Imaging; 1999 Feb; 12(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 10036662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Workstation scheme and implementation for a medical imaging information system.
    Tao Y; Miao J
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2003 May; 116(5):654-7. PubMed ID: 12875671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Pulmonary nodule detection and visual search: P45 and P104 monochrome versus color monitor displays.
    Krupinski EA; Roehrig H
    Acad Radiol; 2002 Jun; 9(6):638-45. PubMed ID: 12061737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Use of the SMPTE test pattern in picture archiving and communication systems.
    Gray JE
    J Digit Imaging; 1992 Feb; 5(1):54-8. PubMed ID: 1554759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Workstation design. Image manipulation, image set handling, and display issues.
    Lou SL; Huang HK; Arenson RL
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1996 May; 34(3):525-44. PubMed ID: 8657870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Concepts in imaging and microscopy: color image processing for microscopy.
    Castleman KR
    Biol Bull; 1998 Apr; 194(2):100-7. PubMed ID: 9604311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.