These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10739365)

  • 1. Robust estimation of the probabilities of 3-D clusters in functional brain images: application to PET data.
    Ledberg A
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2000 Mar; 9(3):143-55. PubMed ID: 10739365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimation of the probabilities of 3D clusters in functional brain images.
    Ledberg A; Akerman S; Roland PE
    Neuroimage; 1998 Aug; 8(2):113-28. PubMed ID: 9740755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nonparametric analysis of statistic images from functional mapping experiments.
    Holmes AP; Blair RC; Watson JD; Ford I
    J Cereb Blood Flow Metab; 1996 Jan; 16(1):7-22. PubMed ID: 8530558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nonstationary cluster-size inference with random field and permutation methods.
    Hayasaka S; Phan KL; Liberzon I; Worsley KJ; Nichols TE
    Neuroimage; 2004 Jun; 22(2):676-87. PubMed ID: 15193596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Linear regression with spatial constraint to generate parametric images of ligand-receptor dynamic PET studies with a simplified reference tissue model.
    Zhou Y; Endres CJ; Brasić JR; Huang SC; Wong DF
    Neuroimage; 2003 Apr; 18(4):975-89. PubMed ID: 12725772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Exact multivariate tests for brain imaging data.
    Almeida R; Ledberg A
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2002 May; 16(1):24-35. PubMed ID: 11870924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On two methods of statistical image analysis.
    Missimer J; Knorr U; Maguire RP; Herzog H; Seitz RJ; Tellman L; Leenders KL
    Hum Brain Mapp; 1999; 8(4):245-58. PubMed ID: 10619418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robust smoothness estimation in statistical parametric maps using standardized residuals from the general linear model.
    Kiebel SJ; Poline JB; Friston KJ; Holmes AP; Worsley KJ
    Neuroimage; 1999 Dec; 10(6):756-66. PubMed ID: 10600421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interpreting temporal fluctuations in resting-state functional connectivity MRI.
    Liégeois R; Laumann TO; Snyder AZ; Zhou J; Yeo BTT
    Neuroimage; 2017 Dec; 163():437-455. PubMed ID: 28916180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Anatomic validation of spatial normalization methods for PET.
    Sugiura M; Kawashima R; Sadato N; Senda M; Kanno I; Oda K; Sato K; Yonekura Y; Fukuda H
    J Nucl Med; 1999 Feb; 40(2):317-22. PubMed ID: 10025841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spatial confidence sets for raw effect size images.
    Bowring A; Telschow F; Schwartzman A; Nichols TE
    Neuroimage; 2019 Dec; 203():116187. PubMed ID: 31533067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accounting for Non-Gaussian Sources of Spatial Correlation in Parametric Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Paradigms II: A Method to Obtain First-Level Analysis Residuals with Uniform and Gaussian Spatial Autocorrelation Function and Independent and Identically Distributed Time-Series.
    Gopinath K; Krishnamurthy V; Lacey S; Sathian K
    Brain Connect; 2018 Feb; 8(1):10-21. PubMed ID: 29161884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of the impact of model-based scatter correction on [18F]-FDG 3D brain PET in healthy subjects using statistical parametric mapping.
    Montandon ML; Slosman DO; Zaidi H
    Neuroimage; 2003 Nov; 20(3):1848-56. PubMed ID: 14642494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Combining spatial extent and peak intensity to test for activations in functional imaging.
    Poline JB; Worsley KJ; Evans AC; Friston KJ
    Neuroimage; 1997 Feb; 5(2):83-96. PubMed ID: 9345540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A statistical method for the analysis of positron emission tomography neuroreceptor ligand data.
    Aston JA; Gunn RN; Worsley KJ; Ma Y; Evans AC; Dagher A
    Neuroimage; 2000 Sep; 12(3):245-56. PubMed ID: 10944407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A method for coregistration of PET and MR brain images.
    Andersson JL; Sundin A; Valind S
    J Nucl Med; 1995 Jul; 36(7):1307-15. PubMed ID: 7790961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Direct reconstruction of parametric images for brain PET with event-by-event motion correction: evaluation in two tracers across count levels.
    Germino M; Gallezot JD; Yan J; Carson RE
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Jul; 62(13):5344-5364. PubMed ID: 28504644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. MR-based attenuation correction for PET/MRI neurological studies with continuous-valued attenuation coefficients for bone through a conversion from R2* to CT-Hounsfield units.
    Juttukonda MR; Mersereau BG; Chen Y; Su Y; Rubin BG; Benzinger TLS; Lalush DS; An H
    Neuroimage; 2015 May; 112():160-168. PubMed ID: 25776213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Simultaneous estimation and segmentation from projection data in dynamic PET.
    Cui J; Yu H; Chen S; Chen Y; Liu H
    Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1245-1259. PubMed ID: 30593666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimation of the number of "true" null hypotheses in multivariate analysis of neuroimaging data.
    Turkheimer FE; Smith CB; Schmidt K
    Neuroimage; 2001 May; 13(5):920-30. PubMed ID: 11304087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.