99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10739372)
1. Comparison of a clinical probability estimate and two clinical models in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. ANTELOPE-Study Group.
Sanson BJ; Lijmer JG; Mac Gillavry MR; Turkstra F; Prins MH; Büller HR
Thromb Haemost; 2000 Feb; 83(2):199-203. PubMed ID: 10739372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of patient location on the performance of clinical models to predict pulmonary embolism.
Ollenberger GP; Worsley DF
Thromb Res; 2006; 118(6):685-90. PubMed ID: 16380153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The interobserver reliability of pretest probability assessment in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.
Rodger MA; Maser E; Stiell I; Howley HE; Wells PS
Thromb Res; 2005; 116(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 15907523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Practical utility of clinical prediction rules for suspected acute pulmonary embolism in a large academic institution.
Moores LK; Collen JF; Woods KM; Shorr AF
Thromb Res; 2004; 113(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 15081559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Comparison of three clinical prediction rules among patients with suspected pulmonary embolism].
Ulukavak Ciftçi T; Köktürk N; Demir N; Oğuzülgen KI; Ekim N
Tuberk Toraks; 2005; 53(3):252-8. PubMed ID: 16258884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Excluding pulmonary embolism at the bedside with low pre-test probability and D-dimer: safety and clinical utility of 4 methods to assign pre-test probability.
Carrier M; Wells PS; Rodger MA
Thromb Res; 2006; 117(4):469-74. PubMed ID: 15893807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the unstructured clinician estimate of pretest probability for pulmonary embolism to the Canadian score and the Charlotte rule: a prospective observational study.
Runyon MS; Webb WB; Jones AE; Kline JA
Acad Emerg Med; 2005 Jul; 12(7):587-93. PubMed ID: 15995088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of pretest probability of pulmonary embolism in the emergency department by physicians in training using the Wells model.
Penaloza A; Mélot C; Dochy E; Blocklet D; Gevenois PA; Wautrecht JC; Lheureux P; Motte S
Thromb Res; 2007; 120(2):173-9. PubMed ID: 17055556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of a clinical probability estimate and two clinical models in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.
Bates SM; Ginsberg JS
Thromb Haemost; 2000 Feb; 83(2):182-4. PubMed ID: 10739369
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the clinical usefulness of two quantitative D-Dimer tests in patients with a low clinical probability of pulmonary embolism.
Djurabi RK; Klok FA; Nijkeuter M; Kaasjager K; Kamphuisen PW; Kramer MH; Kruip MJ; Leebeek FW; Büller HR; Huisman MV
Thromb Res; 2009 Mar; 123(5):771-4. PubMed ID: 18814904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validity and clinical utility of the simplified Wells rule for assessing clinical probability for the exclusion of pulmonary embolism.
Douma RA; Gibson NS; Gerdes VE; Büller HR; Wells PS; Perrier A; Le Gal G
Thromb Haemost; 2009 Jan; 101(1):197-200. PubMed ID: 19132208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Derivation of a simple clinical model to categorize patients probability of pulmonary embolism: increasing the models utility with the SimpliRED D-dimer.
Wells PS; Anderson DR; Rodger M; Ginsberg JS; Kearon C; Gent M; Turpie AG; Bormanis J; Weitz J; Chamberlain M; Bowie D; Barnes D; Hirsh J
Thromb Haemost; 2000 Mar; 83(3):416-20. PubMed ID: 10744147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Clinical probability of PE: should we use a clinical prediction rule?].
Le Gal G; Righini M; Perrier A
Rev Pneumol Clin; 2008 Dec; 64(6):269-75. PubMed ID: 19084205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pulmonary embolism: diagnostic algorithms.
Favretto G; Stritoni P
Ital Heart J; 2005 Oct; 6(10):799-804. PubMed ID: 16270470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Agreement in the clinical diagnosis of pulmonary embolism].
Campo JF; Hernández MJ; Anta M; Saro G; Olmos JM; Riancho JA
Med Clin (Barc); 1998 Jul; 111(4):121-4. PubMed ID: 9717142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A new clinical model in pulmonary embolism and its correlation with V/P scan results.
Hatipoglu ON; Hanci E; Tabakoglu E; Altiay G; Cermik TF; Caglar T
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost; 2006 Jul; 12(3):344-51. PubMed ID: 16959689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical usefulness of D-dimer depending on clinical probability and cutoff value in outpatients with suspected pulmonary embolism.
Righini M; Aujesky D; Roy PM; Cornuz J; de Moerloose P; Bounameaux H; Perrier A
Arch Intern Med; 2004 Dec 13-27; 164(22):2483-7. PubMed ID: 15596640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Simple and safe exclusion of pulmonary embolism in outpatients using quantitative D-dimer and Wells' simplified decision rule.
Goekoop RJ; Steeghs N; Niessen RW; Jonkers GJ; Dik H; Castel A; Werker-van Gelder L; Vlasveld LT; van Klink RC; Planken EV; Huisman MV
Thromb Haemost; 2007 Jan; 97(1):146-50. PubMed ID: 17200782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The bedside investigation of pulmonary embolism diagnosis study: a double-blind randomized controlled trial comparing combinations of 3 bedside tests vs ventilation-perfusion scan for the initial investigation of suspected pulmonary embolism.
Rodger MA; Bredeson CN; Jones G; Rasuli P; Raymond F; Clement AM; Karovitch A; Brunette H; Makropoulos D; Reardon M; Stiell I; Nair R; Wells PS
Arch Intern Med; 2006 Jan; 166(2):181-7. PubMed ID: 16432086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Deferment of objective assessment of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism without increased risk of thrombosis: a practical approach based on the pretest clinical model, D-dimer testing, and the use of low-molecular-weight heparins.
Siragusa S; Anastasio R; Porta C; Falaschi F; Pirrelli S; Palmieri P; Gamba G; Granzow K; Malato A; Minardi V; Tatoni P; Bressan MA; Mariani G
Arch Intern Med; 2004 Dec 13-27; 164(22):2477-82. PubMed ID: 15596639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
